Author name: Townships Weekend

Politics, culture, sport = Habs

Courtesy

Quebecers embraced a sports team that made them proud. And today?

By David Winch

Local Journalism Initiative

With the return of the fall season, NHL hockey looms again, as imposing as ever in Quebec culture and society. You have to wonder: Are culture and sport the same thing here?

The death of Canadiens great Ken Dryden on Sept. 5 sparked an outpouring of laments from unlikely sources — politicians, editorialists and health professionals.

In addition to his hockey stardom, Dryden wrote a milestone book, The Game (Collins, 1983), one with real literary value. It painted the players and sport in a subtle tone, and avoided making heroes out of ordinary guys who happened to develop great athletic skill.

Dryden’s book helped hockey literature catch up, notably with baseball, which has long been a magnet for writers and bookish types, producing sports classics like The Boys of Summer and incisive journalism at the New Yorker level by John Updike and Roger Angell.

Dryden made writing and thinking about hockey a Serious Thing. We need more of it.

Endless winning streak

My student days in the 1970s luckily fell amidst the Canadiens’ and Dryden’s endless Cup-winning streak. It felt like a magnetic field. Mordecai Richler had his alter ego in novel Barney’s Version skip out of his own wedding reception to check the score of a Bruins-Habs  game. The Canadiens, he wrote, seemed to be “a spiritual necessity”.

The greatest Habs players, from Maurice Richard to Jean Béliveau and Guy Lafleur, each mirrored Quebec society. As Globe writer Scott Disher wrote when Lafleur suddenly left the team in 1984, Richard evoked Premier Duplessis and the “dark and Catholic” world he grew up in, while Béliveau was a dapper 1960s gentleman like reformist Premier Jean Lesage. Finally, the mercurial Guy Lafleur echoed charismatic René Lévesque, able to single-handedly bring a Forum crowd to its feet with an electrifying performance.

These heroes have been canonized by the Canadiens’ talented promotions team, one which, quips sportswriter Michael Farber, does ceremony “better than any institution outside the House of Windsor”.

Sports as civic religion

Sports fans today often have a supersized identification with their teams.

In the film The Day after Tomorrow, a 2004 climate-disaster thriller, for example, the oceans rise and winds blow wild. At a remote Scottish climate-research centre, the generator suddenly breaks down. Three British scientists, stranded and facing doom, break out their bottle of Balvenie Doublewood 12-year-old whisky, and raise a final glass together. They give cheers first “to England”, then “to mankind”, and finally …  “to Manchester United”.

Like football’s Manchester United, historic Canadian NHL teams the Toronto Maple Leafs and Canadiens inherited a hardcore following rooted in their community and region. As with England’s football teams, players often came from nearby working-class neighbourhoods.

Globalization, however, has hugely impacted pro sports. Cities and regions are now just called “markets”. Teams have become steadily more uniform. By 2003, big-money London club Chelsea fielded a side with no native-born English players.

Q.: Does team identity matter anymore?

Identity matters

The Canadiens faded badly after their last Stanley Cup in 1993. By the early 2000s there were doubts about club ownership and even its survival. A buyer for the franchise was not easily found — even at bargain-basement prices.

The sports public in Montreal, however, has an insatiable appetite for hockey; it is not easily quenched. Today there are even summertime podcasts devoted to little but the prospects for the Canadiens’ second line.

Coincidentally, a new work by a devoted fan and outspoken contrarian, Brendan Kelly, appeared in October, Habs Nation: A People’s History of the Montreal Canadiens (Baraka, 2025), which analyses this attachment.

Kelly insists on the social and political dimension of Canadiens fandom. This is a welcome take in the politically agnostic world of sports journalism. He notes, for example, the odd coincidence of deep slumps for the Canadiens after 1980 and 1995 — two years with tumultuous referendum campaigns.

Kelly’s take is often glass-half-empty; I am usually glass-half-full.  I tolerated former general manager Marc Bergevin’s mixed results in the 2010s, given his star goalie, division champions and single Stanley Cup final. Kelly skewered the GM for all his middling teams and lack of consistency.

Kelly focuses on the Canadiens’ French tradition – it was founded in 1909 as a rival to English and Irish Catholic squads — and how the team’s lack of success in recent decades has, to some extent, been correlated with the decline in its francophone content.

Sports-site posters regularly say, “I couldn’t care less the nationality, language whatever of the players – just win”. This is a standard Anglo position, audible whenever there is lobbying for, say, a francophone coach or player.

But some statistical research on the Canadiens, argues Kelly, shows that CH teams with more French content have succeeded more often. He highlights specifically the last Cup winner in 1993. There were then 14 francophone players on GM Serge Savard’s squad after he had made a point of scouring Quebec minor leagues for help.

Kelly underlines other Habs GMs’ failures to draft obvious Quebec Major Junior league stars, notably Denis Savard in 1980 and Patrice Bergeron in 2003. I would add their extreme carelessness in ignoring Laval star Mike Bossy, available in 1977; he might have powered more ‘80s championships. Likewise, disastrous trades, especially that of franchise legend Patrick Roy, led to lengthy rebuilds.

Did Canadiens’ managers, then running a billion-dollar operation, gradually decide that global sports success meant downplaying local talent?

To be fair, Montreal fans’ yearning for local stars has led to other fiascos, notably drafting the disappointing Louis Leblanc and trading for flashy but volatile Jonathan Drouin.

Kelly bravely shines a light on these gross failures of the Canadiens, but also stresses their need for rootedness. A tricky balancing act.

As the 2025-26 season begins, we can only wonder, with Kelly: where are the Canadiens (and Quebec society) headed? Ken Dryden must be wondering.

Politics, culture, sport = Habs Read More »

A double assault on reality

Courtesy

By Guy Rex Rodgers

Local Journalism Initiative

No immigrant has been more warmly embraced by Quebec, and no immigrant has been a better ambassador abroad.  Kim Thúy came here in 1978 along with a wave of boat people from Vietnam.  For almost half a century, she has gratefully celebrated the kindness she experienced as a 10-year-old refugee in Granby.

Thúy’s debut novel Ru won the 2010 Governor General’s Award for French-language fiction and the 2015 edition of Canada Reads. The film adaptation premiered at the 2023 Toronto International Film Festival.  Ru reads like an autobiography, of a girl born in 1968 during the Tet Offensive, and then immigrated a decade later to Quebec. Kim Thúy wrote the novel in honour of the people who welcomed her family with Township hospitality when they first arrived in Granby.  Ru is a powerful take of humanity that transcends boundaries and cultures. It has been translated into more than 30 languages and acclaimed internationally.

On September 9, Kim Thúy made her debut as a playwright with Am, the opening production of Théâtre du Nouveau Monde’s 2025/26 season. Nothing in the promo text on TNM’s website suggested that Kim Thúy had written an incendiary cri de coeur.  “With her smiling sincerity, Kim Thúy invites us to share her attentive look at everyday intimacy. A woman and a man meet, and the author allows us to discover this love as she would invite us to observe the blossoming of a flower. However, the relationship between Jacques and Ành is elusive, like water: everything becomes fluid between the Vietnamese woman and the Québécois businessman.”

Am is not a conventional love story about a woman and a man. It is the story of an immigrant and her adoptive homeland. At the end of the play, the immigrant affirms her love for Quebec and the French language. “I will defend this language until the end of my life because it is my language of love.”  But something has changed and the woman is feeling “a profound heartache for Quebec.”

The media wanted to know if the play was as autobiographical as Thúy’s novel, and if she was feeling the same ‘profonde peine d’amour avec Québec’ as her character. Thúy confessed to being deeply disturbed by the surge of anti-immigrant rhetoric in Quebec.  When pressed for an example, she could not cite a specific incident. The situation is elusive and fluid, like water. No single drop of rain causes a devastating flood. Kim Thúy confessed that she can no longer recognize the land that welcomed her as a child, and she has become so disturbed by the change that she is ‘thinking of leaving Quebec.’  

Instantly, Kim Thúy was all over the media, and social media exploded. A predictable group of ethno-nationalists immediately interpreted Thúy’s cri de coeur as Quebec-bashing by an ungrateful immigrant repaying kindness with contempt.  “Why don’t you go back where you came from!  Bon débarras.” Then immigrants defended Kim Thúy and counter-attacked the ethno-nationalists.

Throughout all of this, Kim Thúy remained serene, not taking sides, but in fact defending both sides, and lamenting a double assault on reality. Thúy’s capacity to look at Quebec through a dual lens makes her cri de coeur especially insightful.  She is not accusing friends and neighbours of anti-immigrant rhetoric. She points to ‘political discourse’ that has poisoned the water during the ‘past two or three years.’  This is not the Quebec she knew. Why has the ‘real Quebec’ allowed this to happen? 

The other assault on reality is the demonization of immigrants. The current government has scapegoated immigrants for all the problems they are incapable of fixing. Can’t find a doctor?  Too many immigrants. Not enough teachers?  Too many immigrants. Rents unaffordable? Too many immigrants.  The current government has also blamed a ‘language crisis’ on too many English-speaking students, temporary workers and immigrants. 

For the past ‘two or three years’ I have been touring a documentary film around Quebec, listening to people’s stories, and more recently I have been interviewing ex-students about education in Quebec prior to Bill 101. The people I have been speaking to share three sentiments with Kim Thúy.   First, they have chosen to live in Quebec because it felt like home. Second, they have been disturbed by the swelling tide of xenophobic rhetoric. Third, they have wondered why the majority of Québécois-de-souche — who are friends, neighbours, colleagues and in-laws — have silently allowed Quebec to be changed in so many negative and destructive ways.

Kim Thúy has courageously spoken out in defence of immigrants, who work hard and make valiant efforts to be good citizens in their host country.  She is also speaking in defence of the Quebec that welcomed her as a child and made her proud to rebuild her life here. Until now. Two realities are under assault. Immigrants know their worth. They will stay and prove it, or relocate to a more hospitable society. Who is speaking for the Québécois who do not agree with the anti-immigrant rhetoric?  Why have they allowed their beloved Quebec to be hijacked?

 All the polls show that the CAQ has alienated large segments of the electorate, and every day they find new nails to hammer into their coffin.  The CAQ will soon be gone, but who will replace them? 

Which new leaders will have the courage and vision to restore the reality that made Kim Thúy – and the rest of us – proud to live in Quebec?

A double assault on reality Read More »

Weather or not, here fall comes!

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

With autumn officially started, it’s time to get out that hiking gear and get ready for some crisp fall days ahead. Putting those humid and rainy days in the past, forecasts call for weather favourable to outdoor activities. Whether you’re an avid sports enthusiast or a casual afternoon walker, the coming weeks should bring their slate of good times. 

According to Kevin Mackay, a meteorologist at the Weather Network, the general driver for Canada’s fall weather is a “large-scale global pattern.” This correlates to above-average temperatures. “Certainly, in the eastern half of the country, that’s a stronger signature.” In almost all of Canada, these temperatures will be this way. Only British Columbia is set to have cooler-than-normal temperatures.

“For the Eastern Townships, it should settle to a drier fall, as a whole,” said Mackay. This comes from a lower number of fall storms than what is usually expected. 

One of the reasons for this is the “Bermuda high,” also referred to as the “Azores high.” This is a high-pressure system located over the Atlantic Ocean which pushes weather systems in a clockwise manner. While it can push heat and humidity northbound, during hurricane season, these highs can contribute to directing precipitation towards south-eastern Quebec and the Eastern Townships. The extent to which the Bermuda high moves towards the Atlantic coast is a major contributor to predicting the degree to which New England and Canada will get the tail-end of tropical storms.

“Right now, it’s looking like that storm track will be north of the St. Lawrence, for the most part. So, for the Eastern Townships, it should settle to a drier fall as a whole,” explained the meteorologist.

According to data published by Environment and Natural Resources Canada, Sherbrooke typically gets 96.6mm of rainfall in the month of October and 79.3mm in November. In terms of temperatures, October usually has maximum highs of 12.6 degrees and minimum temperatures of 1.3 degrees (with an average daily temperature of 6.9). For November, the daily maximum is 5.8, the minimum is -3.7 with a daily average temperature of 1.1 degrees.

While the above-normal temperatures are expected until the end of October, Mackay suggests making the most of the early weeks of the month for which there is a higher likelihood of nicer weather.

He explained that the temperature predictions take into account the mean temperature for the entire day and not simply daytime highs and overnight lows. So, while the mean temperature may only indicate one degree above normal, this might actually represent daytime temperatures of five to seven degrees higher than the fall average. 

However, the meteorologist classified fall weather as a “one step forward, two steps back situation,” saying, “You might still have a day or two below normal, but then we’ll get back into those above-normal days. We should have more stresses of above normal temperatures than stresses of below normal for the next couple of [weeks].”

As an avid outdoors person, he urged people to spend time outside enjoying the weather, reassuring people that they can be more willing to book trips and outings in advance as there’s a slimmer chance of running into a forecast that would alter plans.

On the flip side, people looking forward to early snow will have to contain their excitement as the first snowfalls are only expected for later in the month of November. With the second half of hurricane season in full swing, active periods of rain are more likely. However, because of the atmospheric conditions surrounding the Bermuda high, the storm track is set to be pushed towards inland United States rather than towards Maine and Quebec. 

The Weather Network’s forecast outlines that mild temperatures are expected to continue into November, but during those weeks, a more active period of storms may occur. It also argues for an “abrupt transition into early winter” towards the end of November. This would make ski stations able to open sooner rather than later. 

It will be interesting to keep these predictions in mind as the season unfolds. For the start of October, forecasts seem to be following a trend of high temperatures with little to no precipitation. People who love the outdoors should be content with this swift change in weather following this summer’s high levels of humidity and spouts of heavy rainfall. 

Weather or not, here fall comes! Read More »

Playing it safe

The psychology of music consumption

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

Following previous articles written about various aspects of music, from the creative process to the evolution of release practices, another question arose: How much music is too much? As in- with Bluetooth headphones being so common, and it being so easy to listen to music on-the-go, is there a point at which it’s possible to listen to music too often to the point of it becoming detrimental to a person’s mental health?

One study from British researchers Katie Rose Sanfilippo, Neta Spiro, Miguel Molina-Solana and Alexandra Lamont revealed the average adult listens to music for 18 hours during the week. In fact, some 44 to 68 per cent of a person’s “waking hours” are soundtracked by music. 

To understand the benefits and pitfalls of these habits, this reporter spoke to Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise, a professor of psychology at Bishop’s University. She broke down the effects it may have into a few categories, including the aspect of creating art and consuming it. The professor also specified that in terms of consequences on mental health, listening to music isn’t different from consuming other forms of art.

She mentioned that being creative has its share of positives for mental health. “It provides an alternative for emotional expression, essentially,” the professor shared during an interview. Unless you are singing, Malboeuf-Hurtubise explained, “if you’re playing a musical instrument, it provides an alternative means to communicate how you’re feeling without verbal expression.”

Being creative can even become therapeutic, she mentioned. It ends up being a way for a person to process how they’re feeling. As for the act of listening to music, actively listening to lyrics can resonate with people and lead to them feeling connected to the artists, in a way. Lyrical content can be beneficial for listeners, especially when a songwriter is capable of putting a certain feeling into words, which may help the person find a way to categorize or assess their own feelings or given situation. 

“Sometimes, we struggle to put words on how we’re feeling, so that could be a way where we communicate how we’re feeling while using someone else’s creation,” said Malboeuf-Hurtubise.

On the flip side, songs that feature derogatory terms runs the risk of “normalizing or popularizing a discourse that would be frowned upon.” Despite these risks, the professor doesn’t believe this to be a generalized phenomenon. 

She added that if music naturally lowers a person’s stress levels and bolsters their mental wellbeing, it will probably put them in a better state to decompress and enjoy the moment they are living through.

This decompressed state can place someone in a better position to study, work or focus on a given task, she explained. She gave the real-world example of elementary school teachers playing soft or classical music for students when they’re in a quiet moment or when they’re reading. “It’s really through the pathway of increasing wellbeing, releasing tension, and that puts you in a better state to focus more.”

To answer this article’s guiding question, the professor answered that in general, no, a person can’t really listen to too much music to the point of it becoming detrimental, though there may be a few exceptions.

“If your mood is very permeable to the music you’re listening to, listening to very aggressive music, if you are very permeable, could make you more aggressive, but that doesn’t happen for everyone,” she pointed out.

As for people who are used to listening to music all the time, this could lead to a difficulty with accepting silence, though this would be the same for people that prefer having white noise, such as having the TV on in the background. However, despite this potential challenge, she doesn’t qualify it as a necessarily negative impact of listening to music. 

One negative consequence she outlined was for musicians and artists in highly competitive environments who undergo a great deal of stress. This concept applies to other high-performance fields for which people pursuing those paths undergo great deals of pressure, which may result in stress and other negative effects on wellbeing.

When asked what the healthiest practices would be regarding art consumption, Malboeuf-Hurtubise said that, “the healthiest practice would be: consume art. It’s easy in our fast-going, fast-paced lives to forget to consume art, because we’re occupied with work, our kids, routines and studies.”

This can come in many different forms such as going to a museum, watching a movie or other performances, listening or playing an instrument. 

“All of these have documented benefits for mental health, youth and adults alike, similar to practicing sports, essentially. Sometimes, we need to force it in our routine to consume or be in contact with art, but it actually has a lot of positive impacts on one’s wellbeing.”

She mentioned that in recent years, some doctors have been giving less traditional forms of prescriptions to their patents. For some, this may be a nature prescription to try and get the person outside, but others may give cultural prescriptions which include consuming art. 

“The key is to find one artistic medium that can speak to you and be in contact with that one. Same thing with music: there are many different types of music, but anyone can find something that fits their needs,” she concluded.

Playing it safe Read More »

The difficult task of bringing change to Canada Post

By Nick Fonda

Local Journalism Initiative

Last Friday, I walked to my mailbox only to find it empty.  Later I heard on the radio that postal workers were on strike.  Again.

In one way, this was not a surprise.  The postal strike late last fall came to an end only through government legislation without actually resolving any of the issues—wages, benefits, and especially job security—that prompted the strike in the first place.  

On the question of wages, workers were seeking a pay raise of 24 per cent over four years.  Given the steep rise in the cost of almost everything, postal workers had good reason to ask for a substantial increase in salary.  However, Canada Post, which offered a pay boost of 11 per cent over the same four years, was even more cash-strapped than its employees.  Since before Covid, Canada Post has watched its annual deficit increase exponentially.  Over the last seven years, it has received government bailouts amounting to almost four billion dollars, one billion of that coming in the form a loan last January.  On average, Canada Post is losing $10 million every day.

How can you ask your boss for a raise when your boss is himself in debt?

A crown corporation since 1981 (one of about four dozen including Via Rail, the CBC, and the Business Development Bank), Canada Post is owned by the federal government but operates independently.  Unlike private businesses and corporations which are profit-driven, Canada Post does not need to earn its shareholders—Canadian taxpayers—money, although for many years it did.  Now, it just doesn’t want to keep losing quite so much money.  It exists to provide a service that is of benefit to the country’s citizens, but that a private entrepreneur would judge insufficiently lucrative to undertake.

Postal service has existed in Canada since colonial times.  (In the early 1800s, when Sherbrooke was still Hyatt’s Mills, Isaac Cutter’s stagecoaches delivered the Royal Mail the length of the lower St. Francis River valley.)  As long as all long-distance communication relied exclusively on letter writing, the postal service thrived.  Its first rival was the telegraph, but telegrams, for all their impressive speed, were expensive and necessarily very short.  Except in emergencies, telegrams were rarely sent.  Family and friends kept in touch by letter.  At its inception, the telephone posed no more of a challenge to postal service than the telegraph, but that started to change in the decades following World War II.  The telephone became a ubiquitous household item, and calling across the country or even overseas became easily affordable.  A chat on the phone became a viable alternative to the handwritten letter.  If technological innovation had stopped with the phone, Canada Post would still be doing just fine.  

Unfortunately for Canada Post (and any Luddites among us), the telephone has given way to the smartphone and the personal computer.  We communicate now by text message, by email, and by video conference calls.  We pay our bills on line, so we no longer put our cheques in the mail.  We might still send a few Christmas cards and an occasional birthday card, but we only rarely write and mail a letter anymore.  Two decades ago, Canada Post was delivering five billion pieces of mail annually.  Since then, that number has dropped by almost 70 per cent.

Designed four centuries ago (in 1635, King Charles I made the Royal Mail available to all citizens) to deliver letters, the Post Office finds itself with an ever-decreasing number of letters to deliver.  Yet, every year, there are more households to which service has to be provided.  By law, the Post Office is obliged to deliver the mail five days a week to even the most remote communities.  

What has long been a difficult situation is steadily growing more difficult.  Recently, Joël Lightbound, the minister responsible for Canada Post, described the crown corporation as being essentially insolvent and facing an existential crisis.  He went on to say that Canada Post is worth saving, and that the government is open to making changes to ensure its survival.

The Industrial Inquiry Commission (IIC) is the most recent panel that examined Canada Post’s operations and submitted recommendations to render its services sustainable.  (There have been at least six such studies since 2008.)  The IIC was led by William Kaplan (arguably Canada’s best-known mediator) and received almost 1,000 submissions from individuals and organizations.  

The Commission first noted that Canada Post is in serious financial trouble that cannot be solved by making small adjustments to its current operating procedure.  It has to undertake major changes, including amending its charter obligation to provide daily household mail delivery.  Similarly, the moratorium on the closure of rural post offices needs to be lifted.  The Post Office has to be able to hire part-time employees as needed at peak times and to operate on weekends.  Mail delivery deadlines which now range from two days for local mail to four days for cross-country mail should be changed to three and seven days respectively, allowing non-essential mail to be shipped on the ground rather than by air, which is far more costly.   

At the present time, door-to-door mail delivery in Canada costs $279 per person annually.  Eliminating home delivery and replacing it with community mail boxes would reduce that cost by almost half.  It would also result in the cutting of many jobs.  In itself, this would be a boon for Canada Post.  In 2023, the crown corporation had an operating budget of $7.3 billion, two thirds of which was spent on salaries.

Last year, one third of Canada Post’s revenue came from letter delivery, but one half came from parcel delivery with the rest coming from the delivery of flyers and brochures.  While Canada Post has a monopoly on delivering letters, there are a number of companies like FedEx and UPS that gladly deliver parcels for a fee.  Canada Post wants to be able to better compete in parcel delivery, where it is losing market share. 

While the government accepts the IIC findings and recommendations, the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) is less than happy with them.   Job cuts and part-time hirings run contrary to its goals.  (Among other things, CUPW is proud of its role in making maternity leave a commonplace practice.)  Postal workers, understandably, don’t want to pay the steep price that restructuring Canada Post is going to require.  CUPW has made suggestions to redress the corporation’s exploding deficits, specifically to let Canada Post expand into banking, financial, and insurance services.  It has also pointed out that executive pay is too high.  (Canada Post’s chief executive officer, Doug Ettinger, earned $450,000 last year.)  Unfortunately, even with best-case scenarios, these proposals would do little to address the corporation’s deficits.

The Canadian Encyclopedia traces postal strikes back to 1965, when workers staged a two-week wildcat strike that garnered considerable public support.  Postal workers have gone on strike at least once in every decade since then, and job security has always figured as a key issue.   This time round, it figures even more prominently.  The Post Office employs about 50,000 people, most of whom earn a little more than $50,000 annually.  Management suggests that many of the job cuts can be achieved through retirement, with more than 10,000 letter carriers within five years of retirement age.

Ultimately, as William Kaplan points out, Canada Post exists to provide a service to Canadians, and not for the benefit of postal workers.  Public support for the mail strike is much more lukewarm than it was in 1965.  Minister of Jobs and Family, Patty Hadju, recently asked both parties to reach a settlement, not ruling out quick government back-to-work legislation.

For many small businesses—including The Record—the current mail strike only hurts.  It’s true that The Record puts out an on-line edition, so subscribers can still get their daily news fix.  Nevertheless, for Luddites like me, The Record’s columnists and crosswords are best enjoyed on newsprint.

                                                                                  

The difficult task of bringing change to Canada Post Read More »

Ready or not, here comes AI

Our hopes and fears about new tools need leavening with common sense

By David Winch

Local Journalism Initiative

What are we to make of AI?

September 2 was the 1,000th day since the release of ChatGPT, the easily accessible artificial-intelligence tool launched by OpenAI. More AI tools have proliferated as tech heavyweights Google, Microsoft and Meta have released their own consumer models.

Three years may seem like a short time but, as one writer noted, it means that freshman students entering college this month will have spent most of their high-school years with access to some version of this tool. A Pew survey of U.S. students concludes that 26 per cent use AI regularly, and that seems low.

Diligent scholars can use AI for research or as an aid in essay-writing. But vast numbers will use it to, yes, write their essays entirely. And if essay-writing becomes just a cat-and-mouse game between teachers and students, much of the education edifice would collapse.

As a result, many professors are returning to in-class testing and essay-writing, oral exams and handwritten “blue book” examinations. 

Education is not the only field being upended by AI. Accountants, lawyers, engineers, and even doctors — every profession involving repetitive calculations or programmable rules — may see large swathes of their workload reconfigured by AI.

As for writers and editors — hey, do you really know who wrote this article?

Courtesy
Searches using artificial intelligence apps often produce laughably wrong or outdated information.

Real information scarce

We are bombarded these days with news about AI. Some media reports sound urgent, frightened, even hysterical. Artificial intelligence is “a subject of nonstop hype and anxiety”, concludes the monthly Commentary.

It adds more soberly that “today, AI systems are involved in driving cars and trucks, running factories, diagnosing patients, and other high-stakes enterprises. And for the most part, they do these things exceptionally well”.

On the other hand, the doomsday narrative remains strong. It is backed by very credible actors.

Canadian AI pioneer and Nobel Prize for Physics winner Geoffrey Hinton wants governments to be cautious and to impose regulations. Hinton cites AI misinformation, its threat of job losses and more advanced cyberattacks. There is the ominous possibility of AI eventually outsmarting humanity.

“In early 2023 I realized that the digital intelligences we’d already created, although they weren’t as smart as us yet, might actually be a much better form of intelligence than biological intelligence,” Hinton told the Globe and Mail. There is no instance of more intelligent beings ruled by less intelligent beings. How will humans fare?

The “singularity” is a term created to describe the exact point at which AI will surpass human intelligence. Today, 2029 is a common forecast. — Meaning, tomorrow!  

Frankenstein, a Gothic novel written by Mary Shelley in 1818, got the ball rolling about man-made threats to humanity. But artists have often drawn up nightmare scenarios.

In the film 2001, A Space Odyssey (1968), the computer HAL takes control of a huge spacecraft and dictates terms to its beleaguered astronaut. Director Stanley Kubrick played on the widespread 1960s fear of big computer companies like IBM “taking over”. (In the alphabet, H-A-L is one letter short of I-B-M, get it?).

Back in 1968, IBM was the most powerful corporation in the United States, with a market value of $260 billion in today’s terms. Today, IBM ranks just 68th among Fortune 500 companies. So, its intimidating power has been deflated to a great degree.

That may be a precursor to diminishing fears about AI. After all, we accepted pocket calculators being used during math and science exams, after much alarmist talk about them leading to dumbed-down degrees.

Similarly, the question today remains open: Is AI basically like a vacuum, just sweeping up Internet information? Or a “microwave” just reheating existing sources? Will it ever be able to use what the great philosopher Kant called “synthetic” reason, the ability to produce original thoughts?

AI is anchored in large language models (LLMs), which absorb text on the Internet, then combine and regurgitate pieces of it based on the best probabilities of the correct answer. It has no understanding of concepts per se.

There is reportedly no evidence that LLM models are yet approaching artificial general intelligence (AGI), which could match or exceed human cognitive abilities. AGI could generalize knowledge and solve new problems without needing task-specific programming.

Courtesy
Doomsday takes on AI are often being razzed as premature and over-the-top.

Practical value tested

Road tests suggest that today’s AI has more limited abilities.

For example, the business section of the Globe recently assembled a panel of financial advisers to assess how good AI-generated advice really was about personal finance – spending, saving, credit, investments.

Their verdict? The panel gave mixed grades for ChatGPT’s answers to basic financial questions. The AI tool averaged just 7 to 7.5 out of 10, getting much basic info right but in other areas its judgement was heavily criticized.

Such tests are fun to do. Recently, I asked ChatGPT to review and advise me about something I know well – my own writing portfolio (davidwinch.website). Its assessment was revealing but also spit out flatly wrong story titles, somehow imagined from themes I covered.

Meanwhile, Meta AI helpfully suggested that I should emulate flamboyant 1940s New York writer and critic A.J. Liebling, while MS Copilot added some Townships content with advice to model my writing on …. Mordecai Richler. I am sure Mordecai would have had a good chuckle at that suggestion.

Then there is the issue of today’s AI models “hallucinating”, with crazy answers. Users have groaned at AI Gemini producing wacky search results —advice that you should use glue to keep toppings on pizza, for example, that you should eat rocks every day or that bathing with a toaster will unwind your stress.

Not to shock anybody, since I often bathe with a toaster, ha, but I have no confidence in these results.

Our AI future will surely unwind in unpredictable ways. But in the meantime, we are left with one more question: Who the heck actually wrote this article?

Ready or not, here comes AI Read More »

It might have been the hug

Townships’ businesses report strong tourism season

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

While there was a steep decline in Canadian tourists visiting the United States, the number of American visitors visiting Canada remained stable throughout the summer declining by only eight per cent for the month of July. The number of American visitors to Quebec for the month dropped by 24,439, compared to July of 2024.

The local tourism board conducted a mid-summer review for the period of May 1 to July 31, surveying 111 tourist businesses and organizations about the outcome of the tourist season.

“The summer season is going very well in the Eastern Townships,” reassured Hallé during an interview.

According to the survey, 88 per cent of respondents were either satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome of the start of the season. In the accommodation sector, it rises to 93 per cent of respondents being satisfied. Last year, the overall number was closer to 60 per cent, said Hallé.

Hallé highlighted how this success is quite remarkable considering the current period of political tension, inflation, and the cold and rainy weather that plagued May and June.

“It’s the month of July that reversed the trend with warm weather and sunshine,” she said. “As a result, we have nearly 60 per cent of businesses reporting high or very high traffic, so that’s very good.”

Hallé noted that both Quebec and American tourists seem to be on the rise in the region, despite border entry data being more pessimistic. The boycott of American goods (and the country itself) which started as a result of the trade war and the United States administration’s policy created a movement which encouraged a greater number of Quebecers to visit the Eastern Townships. Nearly one- fifth of businesses surveyed reported a “major increase” in visitors from the province. Overall, tourist spending remained stable this summer.

Hallé pointed to a CAA survey whose findings were published on June 4, which ranked the Townships as the fourth most desirable vacation destination in the province. It is ranked below Quebec City (and the surrounding area), Gaspésie and Charlevoix.

“We can say that, yes, the boycott had an effect on our visitors from Quebec, and for the American visitors, 33 per cent of businesses report an increase in Americans,” the spokesperson said.

This year, there has been a trend of last-minute bookings, according to Hallé. This may be due to weather, budgets or “last-minute opportunities.” This trend puts pressure on businesses, which can be uncertain about the number of visitors they may have at a given moment.

While many businesses report more visitors, room occupancy in the accommodation sector has slightly decreased since 2024. In hotels with between four and 39 rooms, the occupancy rate is 38.8 per cent, down 3.8 per cent compared to last year. For establishments with more than 40 rooms, occupancy is 55.5 per cent, an increase of 1.8 per cent.

While it is difficult to measure the full impact of the viral ad campaign launched by Tourism Estrie (“Come Hug It Out in the Eastern Townships”), the communications director admitted that it is possible it had the desired effect. The goal of the campaign was to rebuild bridges between the Townships and tourists from the north-eastern United States over the long term by “consolidating the image” of the region as warm and welcoming.

The tourism board is pondering a second ad campaign, specifically for the fall, but Hallé revealed that there were no concrete plans at this time. Meanwhile,“Come Hug it Out” is still being aired in New England, which will focus on the state of New York in the coming months.

Another boost to the region’s visibility came via an episode of The Amazing Race Canada (Season 11, Episode 6, “I Am A Goat”), which aired on CTV and Crave Aug. 19. Filmed in May, teams visited Sherbrooke, Valcourt, Bromont and Sutton to showcase Townships culture, heritage, active outdoors and wineries,” explained Hallé. “It gave us exceptional national visibility, reaching more than 1.3 million viewers every season across the country.”

Tourism Eastern Townships published an itinerary based on the episode, which is available online at https://www.easterntownships.org/article/2099/the-townships-the-amazing-race-canada-style.

It might have been the hug Read More »

Back to School

By Mary Ellen Kirby

Local Journalism Initiative

Well, there they go again. Those big yellow buses are back, prowling the highways and byways of the Townships. Rumbling along their routes twice a day, they’re a clear and colourful signal that the season has irrevocably shifted from carefree summer to back-to-business autumn. I have long thought that Labour Day feels more like a New Year’s Day than January 1st ever did. I mean, what’s so new about one more day in a long string of cold, wintry days? It should take more than flipping a calendar page to herald a new season. A brand-new school year brings a palpable change in the atmosphere; one can almost taste the anticipation, the excitement of embarking on fresh adventures armed with new wardrobes and school supplies, the thrilling promise of unsullied notebooks and sharpened pencils.

   It is unfortunate that the beginning of this bright, shiny new school year is marred by government mismanagement. The swirl of controversy and public outcry over recent miserly budget compressions may have muted somewhat during the summer vacation period. But as classes gear up and the real-time effects of slashed funding become apparent, I think the government’s disapproval rating will climb once more. Our education ministry’s stated goal and insistence on improving the province’s graduation and certification rates is not well served by forcing schools to cut various enrichment programs. Sports, arts, clubs and other extra-curricular activities all serve as a sort of sticky glue that adheres students to boring government-imposed curricula long enough to gain their diplomas. Without the fun frosting extras on the bland reading, writing and  arithmetic cake, students have less motivation to stay in school. Of course, this dampening effect will be felt far enough downstream that future governments can play the plausible deniability card and scold the schools for falling perseverance rates. The ministry’s response to the initial public backlash only added messaging insult to budgetary injury. They seemed to imply that funneling our tax dollars into the education system was a generous favour they were granting us rather than our due. They seemed to forget – or hoped that we would forget – that governments don’t earn their own money to splash around. What they spend is the money picked from our pockets. I guess we are just supposed to tug our forelocks in humble gratitude that they give us back a fraction of it in our so-called public services. As far as I’m concerned, both the CAQ’s education ministry and their public relations people get a big fat F on this report card. We taxpayers should insist they all be fitted for custom made dunce caps and enrolled in remedial fiscal responsibility lessons, ASAP.

   Speaking of school, I will confess that I was one of those weird children who couldn’t wait for the new school year to begin. By the end of July, I was crossing off the days on the little calendar I kept in my room. Not only that, but I always cried on the last day of school. I was heartbroken to leave friends, teachers and especially the library behind for the summer. By my high school graduation, the melancholy of leaving it all behind for good was tempered by the excitement of stepping fully into adult pursuits. That lasted for about a dozen years until my thirst for learning came roaring back. At the ripe old age of 33, I was accepted as a “mature” student at Bishop’s University. Which was kind of ironic because my first sight of the Bishop’s library had me feeling more than a little giddy and immature. My four young children were a bit perplexed that Mommy also had to do homework and found it weird that sometimes I had to go to school after supper, but not on the bus. I attended classes as a part time student for a few years but never did finish my degree. There are those who might suggest my post-secondary education was a failure, but I disagree. I carried several valuable lessons away from my brief foray into the halls of academia: Learning is never wasted, nor is it confined to a classroom. I think my education can be counted a success, not because I can paper my walls with diplomas and degrees, but because it engendered a perpetual, unquenchable yearning for knowledge and gave me the skills needed to satisfy that longing. I believe part of the issue with public education is because it is so arbitrary. Who decided that algebra and  grammar were more important and worthy of marks than painting a portrait or composing a musical score? But perhaps public perception is also part of the issue with public education. Rather than thinking of school as a passive knowledge delivery service, what if we reimagined it as an incubator? What if, instead of teaching to government-imposed curricula and standardized tests, we taught to uncover passions? I wonder what our schools – and indeed, our culture – would look like if we rewarded curiosity and self-directed learning with diplomas?

    While I may have graduated from high school several decades ago, I have never graduated from learning. I would need a minimum of three lifetimes to learn all I want to know. I have filled the years between my brief stint at Bishop’s and today with lots of learning about a myriad of subjects. I have delved into Permaculture techniques, picked up some folk-art painting skills, learned how to identify and protect native pollinators, taught myself a number of food preservation methods and learned to navigate the mysteries of ovine husbandry to name a just few among many. As every golden September rolls around, I get an unquenchable urge to learn something new. This fall I have decided to put an end to my shameful secret: I am a sheep farmer who does not know how to knit. A kind friend will be teaching me the magic art of using two sticks to transform long strands of yarn into something warm and useful. I am going to enjoy learning something practical while I scratch my learning itch for this year. When we were children, I think our ideas of school and learning were kind of backwards; many feel school to be a kind of punishment they could escape from when they got old enough. But the truth is that the quickest way to get old and stodgy is to stop learning. So, in spite of all the noise around education this fall, my hope for all the students on those big yellow buses is that they will vigorously explore whatever piques their curiosity and remember that their learning is better off in their own hands. As for the parents and guardians of those students, I hope they will choose to learn something new with their kiddos. Because the very best teachers are good learners, too.

Back to School Read More »

Phones off, Minds on: Quebec’s 2025 school cellphone ban

By Greg Duncan

Local Journalism Initiative

If you are a student in Quebec in 2025, whether you are in kindergarten or cramming for calculus, your phone is locked away, silenced in a pouch, or tucked deep in your backpack. This school year marks the full rollout of Quebec’s province-wide cellphone ban in all public and private elementary and secondary schools. From the first bell to the last, phones are officially persona non grata on school property, including hallways, cafeterias, bathrooms, and even outdoor fields.

The goal, according to the Ministry of Education, is to restore focus, reduce distractions, and encourage face-to-face socialization. But as with any sweeping policy, the reality on the ground is far more nuanced, especially in the Eastern Townships, where rural bus rides stretch long, and students often rely on their devices for connection, safety, and sanity.

The law of the Land

In May 2025, Education Minister Bernard Drainville announced a regulation banning cellphone use during the entire school day in all elementary and secondary schools, public and private. The law prohibits devices not only in classrooms but also during breaks, lunch, and on school grounds, including libraries, hallways, and outdoor spaces.

The legislation followed recommendations from a cross-party committee studying screen time’s impact on youth. It found phones were a major source of distraction, social isolation, and classroom disruption. Exceptions exist for medical reasons (e.g., diabetes management), students with disabilities or learning challenges and educational use approved by staff.

Each school is responsible for enforcement, with options like locked pouches, mandatory locker storage, and progressive discipline, starting with verbal warnings and escalating to temporary confiscation or requiring students to leave devices at home.

The challenges

Let us be honest: enforcing a full-day ban on cellphones in 2025 is like asking a fish to stay dry. Students are tethered to their devices not just for entertainment, but for communication, organization, and even learning. The ban has sparked logistical headaches for teachers and administrators, especially in schools without enough lockers or secure storage options.

In the Townships, where students often travel long distances by bus, the ban has raised safety concerns. “Some of our kids are on the road for over an hour,” said one Eastern Townships School Board (ETSB) staffer. “They use their phones to check in with parents, listen to music, or decompress. Taking that away entirely feels like a step backward.”

And then there is the post-school screen surge. Teachers report that students, deprived of their devices all day, are logging marathon screen sessions once they get home. “It’s like a digital binge,” said one parent in Stanstead. “They’re glued to their phones from the moment they step off the bus until bedtime.”

Student reactions: Mixed signals

Student reactions have ranged from resigned acceptance to outright protest. In Montreal, students staged walkouts and posted TikTok videos criticizing the ban. “Our phones are a crucial part of our education,” said one student. “We use them to check assignments, communicate with teachers, and stay safe.” Others argue that the ban misses the mark. “It’s not the phones—it’s how we use them,” said a student from Rosemount High School. “Teachers did not grow up with this tech. We did. It is part of how we learn and socialize.”

In the Eastern Townships, reactions have been more subdued but no less conflicted. Some students appreciate the break from constant notifications. “It’s kind of peaceful,” said a Massey-Vanier student. “I actually talk to people more.” Others feel cut off. “I get anxious not knowing what’s going on,” said a student from Alexander Galt. “I just want to check my messages during lunch.”

Screen time after school: The rebound effect

Experts warn that the ban may inadvertently increase screen dependency outside school hours. A professor at Université Laval notes that students often compensate for lost screen time by doubling down after school. “The demand for digital stimulation doesn’t disappear, it just gets delayed,” she said. On school buses, especially in rural areas like the Townships, students are turning to their phones with renewed intensity. “It’s like a digital exhale,” said one bus driver. “They’ve been holding their breath all day.” Parents are also grappling with the fallout. Some report more arguments at home over screen limits, while others worry about the mental health impact of abrupt digital withdrawal. “We need to teach balance, not just ban,” said Katherine Korakakis of the English Parents’ Committee Association.

Where do we go from here?

The cellphone ban is a bold move, but it is not a silver bullet. It may reduce distractions in class, but it also risks alienating students who see their devices as lifelines. In the Eastern Townships, where geography and infrastructure pose unique challenges, a one-size-fits-all policy may need more tailoring.

What is clear is that the conversation around screens, learning, and youth well-being is far from over. As students adapt, educators and parents must do the same by modeling healthy tech habits, fostering open dialogue, and remembering that behind every screen is a kid trying to make sense of a rapidly changing world. Phones may be off during the day, but the debate is just getting going.

Resources and references:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/students-protesting-against-cellphone-ban-quebec-1.7532009

Phones off, Minds on: Quebec’s 2025 school cellphone ban Read More »

Creating your own sound of music

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

Innovation in listening technology, has made it possible to be surrounded by the sound  of your favourite music wherever you are and whatever you are doing. Cell phones have become an all-in-one device, taking over the role once associated with MP3 players or Walkman. Paired with überpopular Bluetooth headphones or ear buds, it’s become convenient to listen to music anywhere you go—at the office, during a bus ride, or even while out for a jog.

Spotify, one of the top music streaming platforms, reports having 678 million users which includes 268 million paying subscribers spread throughout 180 markets. This doesn’t account for users of other equivalent platforms from tech giants Apple, Amazon and YouTube.

Streaming has allowed music lovers to individualize their musical preferences more than ever before. With the click of a button, music lovers can listen to whatever’s been playing on repeat in their mind, create customized playlists, or sing along to their favourite artist’s new album, in the comfort of their home, or anywhere else on the planet.

While the world’s dominating artists; Taylor Swift, The Weeknd, Bad Bunny, Drake and Billie Eilish (Spotify’s 2024 top five artists) fare quite well with this system, it also provides an outlet for aspiring “indie” musicians to share their work in a way that wasn’t possible before. Anyone can release music on the biggest platforms with a subscription to a distribution service.

Evolution of music creation practices

According to Bishop’s University music professor Mathieu Désy, the digital age has revolutionized the way music is created and released. He explained that many people now have home studios and only visit professional ones when they need larger spaces for drums, piano or strings. The availability of “digital workstations” for actual track building and producing can be done remotely, too.

“Now, if you buy a new MacBook you have GarageBand, which allows you to start recording at home. My children can record their own songs, which was not possible if we go back fifteen years,” he pointed out.

While a lot of recording is now done digitally, migrating from analog equipment, which nonetheless sounds better, said Désy, it’s easier, more affordable and accessible to record and release music.

Release format

“There’s no physical medium anymore, unless you really like vinyl or CDs, but they’re not as popular as they used to be, even if they sound great,” added the professor.

Artists can get online distributors to release their music on platforms without ever being associated with a label. Désy pointed out that to have a better chance at being successful and to get proper marketing and publicity, the best route is still to work with a music label.

The professor explained that the concept of “albums” was developed by Frank Sinatra in the 1950s. Following that, many artists released albums which featured songs that formed a coherent unit. Typically, they would then go on tour to promote that new album.

Now, many artists are moving away from the typical album format, which ranges between 40 minutes to one hour in length, and are instead releasing music in the form of EPs, usually between four and six songs—which are first released as singles, one after the other.

“There are still major artists that release albums, but they will go for a couple singles to promote the upcoming album. So, they might release up to three different singles before they release the album.”

Désy explained that tours are a bit more detached from album releases, making it easier for artists to be create more music. An example of this is Taylor Swift’s massively popular Eras Tour, which served as a nostalgic and cumulative take on Swift’s entire discography.

The length of songs has also changed. Online videos on platforms like TikTok or Instagram are often 15 to 20 seconds, with audiences consuming content rapidly. More than a decade ago, most radio hits were around three minutes and a half. Now, many songs are shorter as it’s easier to keep people’s attention, the digital space makes it easier to skip songs, as previously, a vinyl would often be played entirely before changing the side. Now, most songs are three minutes or less, and long introductions aren’t as common to hook listeners with lyrics as quickly as possible.

Staying relevant

The presence of social media has also significantly altered the music industry. With nearly everyone now having an account on one of these platforms, music artists must make themselves relevant in that digital space.

Désy noted that music is getting to a point where artists must be online influencers. By releasing songs more frequently, mostly one at a time, allows artists to stay relevant and keep their audience hooked.

The most important thing the professor believes artists must do to be popular is a strong social media presence. “Promoting yourself has little to do with your artistic creation, but right now, if you want to be interesting for a label, the first thing they will do is go to your social network to see how many followers you have.”

This is also the case for concert hall programmers, meaning that social media has a big impact on the viability of artists.

Diminishing quality of music?

This practice of pumping out music doesn’t necessarily lead to a reduction of quality, according to the professor. It depends on the type of artistic level that musicians strive to achieve.

Originality depends on how much effort artists put in to developing their craft. However, many of the most popular songs rely on similar elements. “I’ve been listening to the top 40 songs, and many of them are using the same chord progression, and there are a dozen chord progressions that are really popular,” said Désy.

“I still think that there are people that are interested in music in a more niche market, or even something that’s more artistically developed, so you still have to do that,” he said. “You still have to find some originality to get followers

Creating your own sound of music Read More »

A story of national fraud, a fight for information and government transparency

Screenshots from Meta
Fraudsters claim Carney created and endorsed a new big-returns investment platform for Canadians in Facebook sponsored posts

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

What started as an investigation into an investment fraud scam promoted through sponsored posts on Meta’s Facebook became a month-long battle for information with numerous Canadian government agencies.

The fraud consisted of Prime Minister Mark Carney deepfakes “talking” about a new investment platform that “brings Canadians” big returns. Canadians were encouraged to make a $355 payment to be part of this “investment program.” It was shared through sponsored Facebook posts from random individuals, such as Brian Lee, who was listed as an entertainment website from Norristown, Georgia.

“Deepfakes use AI to fabricate video or audio of a person saying or doing something they never actually did. Fraudsters use deepfake tools to impersonate celebrities and public figures to trick victims into believing they’re dealing with legitimate sources,” explained Jeff Horncastle of the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre.

Multiple instances of this type of fraud were witnessed by Record staff members, all pretending to be news reports from the CBC. Upon clicking on the post, it brought users to a near-copy of the CBC News website, with an article video from another network—CBS News—and their anchor Shanelle Kaul. The whole website was identical to the real one, but though no other links were valid, except for the article.

Any attempt to report the content on the Facebook platform only results in seeing more of it, as the user is interacting with it. Deepfakes are also visible on other platforms such as YouTube, where public figures are shown (with AI manipulation) to be doing or caught doing something scandalous.

Courtesy
Screenshot of the linked CBC page to the sponsored Facebook posts displaying a story about a new “investment platform” and the site victims are directed to

Fight for information

The Record reached out to the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre on June 17, which collects and provides information on fraud. A deadline was included and was set as the end of the following day. Multiple weeks go by without any response.

The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security whose description is stated as being “the single unified source of expert advice, guidance, services and support on cyber security for government” was then contacted. The email cited the Carney deepfakes requested an interview with a cyber security specialist at their earliest convenience. They responded the same day asking if a written response would be accepted.

The Record reiterated the original request, for which Janny Bender Asselin from Media Relations and Public Affairs answered that they would get back shortly. Five days later, on July 22, she responded with one line: “Unfortunately, we cannot accommodate an interview at this time.”

On the same day, Jeff Horncastle, Client and Communications Outreach Officer from the Anti-Fraud Centre replied to the June 17 email apologizing, saying that the email ended up in their spam folder. He offered an interview for two days later, specifying that the CAFC didn’t have data specific to Mark Carney deepfakes or deepfakes in general, but that he could share crypto investment fraud statistics. An interview was conducted.

The Record broadened its scope and emailed the CRTC on July 22 asking if there is anyone that could speak to the issue, or if they could direct us to the right agency. Media relations officer Mirabella Salem wrote back saying that it falls to Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada.

ISED and their Competition Bureau were contacted for interviews on July 22. ISED launched an AI safety institute in November to understand its risks and how to mitigate them. Media relations officer Hans Parmar asked for a deadline. They were given three days. On July 25, ISED responded with a written statement, bypassing the original request for an interview with a specialist, directing fraud victims to contact their local police and report the situation with the CAFC.

The Competition Bureau declined an interview request on July 28, sending a written statement which stated that the Bureau investigates contraventions to the Competition Act, including with AI. 

“It would be inappropriate for us to speculate on specific situations or to comment on the activities of specific companies, including those mentioned in your request. The Bureau must conduct a thorough and complete examination of the facts of any matter before reaching a conclusion as to whether the Competition Act has been contravened,” wrote Anna Maiorino, the bureau’s communication advisor.

Despite these lengthy email exchanges with five agencies, none assumed responsibility for the file and none knew who is in charge of the oversight of this issue, which directly impersonates the country’s prime minister.

Investment fraud

Deepfakes have led the fraud landscape to significantly evolve from suspicious phone calls and emails. Most instances in which they are used for fraud is linked to cryptocurrency (digital money not reliant on government or bank maintenance) schemes.

Of the $313.8M in losses reported to the CAFC for investment fraud in 2024, $224.2 was linked to crypto, more than 70 per cent. “We estimate that only five to ten per cent of victims actually report to the [Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre], so it’s only a very small sample of what’s actually out there,” Horncastle told The Record.

In the past, there were signs to identify deepfakes, such as choppy video, but they have “evolved substantially.” It’s now come down to assuming the videos or fake until it’s possible to prove that they’re legitimate, Horncastle said. “Right from the beginning, celebrities or public figures endorsing investment platforms should raise a red flag. It’s not impossible, but in most cases, there’s a good chance that it’s fraud.”

Additionally, schemes that promise zero risk or guaranteed return should also be suspicious as “no legitimate investment can promise this,” he explained. There is often pressure to act quickly, so it’s impossible to consult friends or family.

Horncastle defined “victims” as being someone that has lost money or had personal information compromised, such as a driver’s license or social insurance number stolen. Even if they haven’t lost money, when giving these details, an individual becomes at risk of identity theft and fraud.

He encouraged anyone that comes across deepfake videos promoting fraudulent schemes online to report them on their host platform. However, he acknowledged that whenever one is taken down, there’s a good chance another one goes up.

“Fraud is evolving fast and deepfakes are blurring the lines between what’s real and what’s fake like never before, but by staying informed, skeptical and spreading the word, we can reduce victimization and stop fraudsters in their tracks,” he concluded.

Horncastle was unable to tell The Record who is in charge of overseeing circulating fraud schemes on social media.

A story of national fraud, a fight for information and government transparency Read More »

Peace, Love, Conquest and Liberation!

Courtesy

By Guy Rex Rodgers

Local Journalism Initiative

Serge Fiori was a leading musical voice of his generation. His sophisticated songs about peace and love were sung in French, yet earned a sizeable audience among English-speakers in Quebec, Canada and the USA.

Harmonium’s biggest selling album, L’Heptade, was released on Nov. 16, 1976, the same day the Parti Québécois was elected to form its first majority government. When Premier René Lévesque led a delegation to California in 1978 to promote Quebec’s culture and political aspirations, Harmonium headlined the tour.  

Last month, the government of Quebec honoured Fiori with a state funeral, attended by a who’s who of Quebec’s cultural and political luminaries. They celebrated his life and legacy with an outpouring of love. When Régis Labeaume, former mayor of Quebec City and old friend, paid tribute to Fiori’s ‘immense desire for political freedom for the people of Quebec,’ mourners erupted in applause and shouts of approval.

The Parti Québécois is currently leading the polls to win the 2026 provincial election, and Paul St-Pierre Plamondon is promising a referendum on independence in the first term. Francophone media have reported growing support for independence among Gen Z voters.  Independentists are more optimistic than they have been for decades. Youth is on their side! Heroes of the 70s like Fiori are on their side! Contemporary leaders like Labeaume are on their side! The independence movement is having a revival. But nationalism comes in many varieties: some are progressive and inclusive; others are regressive and exclude everyone except members of the dominant ‘tribe.’ 

Back in April, Régis Labeaume was vilified by Péquistes. How did Labeaume incur the wrath of the righteous? He questioned the kamikaze intransigence of Parti Québécois leadership. ‘Why rush headlong into a referendum when all the polls predict a humiliating defeat?’ The question was perfectly reasonable; the PQ response was not.

Nationalists would now like to canonize Serge Fiori and add him to their panoply of Saintly Supporters, but he does not easily fit into their ‘us’ versus ‘them’ duality. Fiori grew up in Montreal’s Little Italy. His father was Italian and his mother was francophone. I am currently conducting a research project on immigration and education. The Italian stories are particularly complex because Italians were mostly Catholic and found the French language easy to learn. Of all the immigrant groups that arrived in Quebec, Italians were the most inclined to integrate with the francophone majority. However, Italians believed in the benefits of knowing two or more languages and so they also wanted to learn English.

Journalist Marie-France Bazzo wrote a column in La Presse last year about her own complex Italian family (St-Léonard et moi).  Her father, like Fiori’s was Italian, and her mother was francophone. When Bazzo’s cousin transferred from French elementary school to English high school, a domestic crisis exploded with all the fury of the St-Léonard riots. Bazzo’s militant mother permanently terminated relations with her Italian husband’s family. Bazzo’s father only saw his brother occasionally, and Bazzo was cut off from her beloved cousin for decades. It is a tragic story that illustrates the kamikaze nature of intransigent nationalism.

Italians made valiant efforts to be part of Quebec but they also wanted to be part of the English-speaking world around them. The aspiration was perfectly reasonable; the nationalist response was not. No group was more vilified in the 60s and 70s than Italians for their desire to speak languages other than French.  Serge Fiori, inspired by the Beatles, wrote his first songs in English.  

Harmonium became national heroes in Quebec, but when they started out their music was so different from other Quebec bands that no record label in Montreal would sign them. They had to go to Toronto to sign with Celebration Records to start their career.  Brendan Kelly wrote a tribute in the Gazette to Fiori, who told him that ‘French radio in Montreal wasn’t into the band in the early days. The first station to play Pour un instant was CHOM.’ And because of that early support Fiori always retained a soft spot for the anglo classic-rock station.

In one version of Quebec history, the foundations were laid prior to the Conquest by immigrants who were Catholic and French-speaking, whose country was stolen.  In another version of Quebec history, almost everything in Quebec was built after the Conquest by immigrants of different languages, religions and cultures.  These versions of Quebec history are not incompatible.

It is possible to be a proud nationalist and also celebrate a complex history that acknowledges many partners. Serge Fiori understood this, which was why his music, and his fans, transcend borders.  

Peace, Love, Conquest and Liberation! Read More »

It’s our predicament to solve

By Mary Ellen Kirby

Local Journalism Initiative

   It seems mid-summer has finally hit its stride, throwing off extreme yo-yoing weather patterns and settling into mellow, sun-warmed, gold-dusted days that glide gently into refreshingly cool evenings. Farm fields and gardens across the Townships are fulsome, burgeoning with abundant crops. Our dusty gravel roads are bustling with the seasonal traffic of busy farm tractors rumbling to and fro towing wagons full of chubby, round hay bales, while the winter wheat fields are already yielding their nodding stalks to prowling combine harvesters.

  Gardens too are maturing, moving from early summer harvests of green onions, lettuce and peas to tomatoes, beans and baby beets. Rather than a date on a calendar, my mid-summer marker is the first cucumber harvest. I canned the first of many batches of pickles this week, so in my books that makes it official. Yesterday, in the cool of early morning, I picked a couple of litres of black currants, courtesy of a generous neighbour. I am transforming my gifted currants into a dessert syrup perfect for topping pancakes or vanilla ice cream. As I navigated the berry patch, I could hear the hens boastfully clucking of freshly laid eggs and the occasional thump of an apple falling to the ground in the orchard behind me. In a nearby pasture, contented cows munched on their breakfast greens, lowing bovine admonitions to wayward, frisky calves. It was a delightfully purposeful start to my day. But here’s the thing about berry picking: while the hands may be busy, the mind is free to wander down sometimes unexpected and twisting paths.

   As the wine dark currants plinked and plunked down into my bucket, it occurred to me that all my five senses were engaged by…food. Everything I was seeing, hearing, smelling, touching and – yes, I admit it – tasting, was food. I was surrounded by food, and I got to wondering how many folks could claim a similar experience. With a rapidly dwindling farm population, I’m willing to bet there aren’t many who would be so fortunate. I also started to wonder how it could be possible – in a land as fertile and bountiful as Canada – that food insecurity has risen so sharply in the last few years. It is a conundrum that I can’t quite grasp. And yet, the numbers don’t lie. According to Food Banks Canada, March of 2024 saw a record high of more than two million visits to food banks all across the country. That number represented a significant 6 per cent increase over the same month in 2023, but a staggering 90 per cent increase over March of 2019. Read that again: an increase of 90 per cent in only five years! That seems unimaginable to me, especially as I live in such a food-rich environment. Hidden in that unfathomable reality, lurks the ugly fact that in excess of 700,000 Canadian children are among those food bank clients. I cannot begin to express my sorrow at those numbers, my heart aches at the thought of even one hungry child. But beyond my sorrow lies a great pool of anger. In this generous and beautiful land of plenty, how has this happened? Who or what is to blame? And how do we fix it?

   As per usual, I have more questions than answers. I suspect there are a number of culprits beyond the most obvious ones. The easy scapegoats are the giant grocery chains; we are quick to accuse them of price gouging and profiteering. And while that certainly may be a huge factor, we consumers need to shoulder some of the responsibility for where we find ourselves. Five major chains account for more than 80 per cent of our grocery purchases in this country. Five big players can easily control pricing nation-wide, throwing us a revolving menu of so-called “specials” to make us think we are getting a bargain. But who made those chains giants in the first place? We did. We abandoned our local Mom & Pop independent grocers for the lure of Bigger! Better! Cheaper! Now we are literally paying the price for that defection. It is a basic precept of economics that competition lowers prices; mergers and buyouts have reduced the playing field to a paltry number of competitors for our food dollars. I suspect they find it ridiculously easy to rig the game. They are not competing against each other…they are playing against us. While young householders today think that a Costco run is the ‘normal’ way to feed themselves, I am old enough to remember a very different food landscape. In 1920s-1930s Lennoxville, for instance, there were two grocers on Queen St. On the corner of Queen and Belvedere, the elegant old structure that now hosts a Subway restaurant was once home to C.C. Chaddock, a purveyor of “Choice Fresh Groceries. Fruits in Season. Fancy Biscuits. Paints and Oils. Shelf Hardware.” Elsewhere along the main street was C.J. Lane & Sons, “Dealers in Groceries, Fruits, Crockery Etc.” Now, while I am not old enough to remember either of those establishments, by the time I was of an age to think about groceries and where to buy them, they had been replaced by a couple of other small grocers. Probably many Record readers will also remember Beaulieu’s store. It occupied the former C.C. Chaddock building, while Nichol’s store was further down Queen St. and was famous for its meat counter. Like their predecessors, Beaulieu’s and Nichol’s are only lines in Lennoxville’s history book now. Maybe it’s just me, but I can’t help feeling the shiny new Maxi with its self-checkout is a poor substitute.  

   I am in no way making excuses for the big grocery chains. They have a long list of transgressions against the average shopper. At the very least, they are guilty of disingenuous marketing practices, perhaps even price fixing or price gouging, although I can’t think of many instances of the federal ‘Competition Act’ being enforced. Perhaps the closest we’ve come lately is the infamous bread price fixing scandal involving Weston and its parent company Loblaws, which resulted in class action lawsuits and fines. That’s just dandy, but has anyone noticed the price of bread going down? That seems a mite odd to me, especially in light of grain prices. Statistics Canada numbers show that farm cash receipts for 2024 went down by 2.1 per cent in the first decline since 2010. That decline was primarily due to the much lower prices farmers received for their grain crops. So, if the price of the chief ingredient in bread dropped significantly for the manufacturers, why are our prices still ridiculously high? My guess is because the big boys are pocketing the difference. Isn’t it cute how they are so quick to pass along their increases but never feel obliged to share their savings?

  But the retailers are not solely to blame for astronomical grocery prices. Perhaps if the federal government hadn’t gone on a pandemic-induced spending spree, the inflation rate wouldn’t have sky-rocketed. And perhaps if average Canadians weren’t losing 45 per cent of their earnings to various levels of government taxation, there would be more left to cover food and shelter costs. Ever since 1993, according to the Fraser Institute, Canadians spend a larger portion of their income on taxes than they do on necessities. That might be justified if we were getting good value for our tax money but lately it feels as though we are paying much more and getting much less…just like the grocery stores. Since governments have contributed mightily to the problem, I think it is unreasonable to expect them to solve it. In fact, I prefer they keep their meddling fingers out of the pie. Government interventions usually cost far more than they are worth.

   So how do we ‘fix’ this? First, I suggest we adjust our lens. We have a national food security predicament, not a problem. Problems can be solved but predicaments can only be managed. So far, I am not inspired by the management of either corporations or governments. That means it is down to us, the consumers. There is no use in wringing our hands and plaintively demanding that ‘Someone do Something’ about the spiralling cost of groceries. Perhaps we could put our hands to better use by growing a garden and cooking from scratch. As a livestock producer, an avid gardener and our household’s food preparation ‘expert’, a goodly proportion of my waking hours are taken up with thoughts and tasks related to food. Through the many millennia of human history, that has been the norm: hunting, growing and preparing food has been our major preoccupation. This recent outsourcing of that responsibility to nameless, faceless corporations is but an infinitesimal blip on our collective human timeline. Will we eventually regain our natural agency over our own nourishment? That remains to be seen. Dealing with this predicament will require creativity, diligence and a willingness to change our habits and that might be too much to ask. Valuable coping strategies would include shopping closer to the source, eating in season, buying ingredients instead of prepared foods, transforming seasonal abundance into food storage for leaner times and creating small neighbourhood networks to share produce or buy staples in bulk. All of these things are possible, but they are not convenient. I think we have forgotten that convenience often carries a high price tag.

   It wasn’t exactly convenient to drive to my neighbour’s farm, spend a few hours picking and sorting black currants, juicing them, adding sugar and spices, reducing it all to a sweet syrup and then canning it in jars for the pantry shelf. My free berries cost me plenty of time and effort. If I paid myself minimum wage, each of those 250 ml. jars of syrup would cost about $20…high-end groceries indeed. Instead, I will be paying my neighbour’s generosity forward and giving some of the syrup away as gifts. I think that when the recipients open the jars this winter, they will be able to smell and taste the essence of mid-summer. The syrup will be infused with my delight in the picking, my neighbour’s kindness and the care that went into its making, and those ingredients can’t be bought at any price in any store. These are the intangible goods we have sacrificed on the altar of Cheap & Convenient. I hope we can reclaim them before it’s too late. And I hope that through small acts of defiance, we can collectively reshape our food landscape to one where we are not at the mercy of giant corporations, where not a single child ever again goes to bed hungry.

It’s our predicament to solve Read More »

Facing the music

How small artists strive to hit the right note

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

Music is an essential part of modern culture and it has become easier than ever to soundtrack one’s life through the plethora of streaming services that have made their appearance in the past two decades. However, even though people can access music with the touch of a button, local and indie artists have to fend for themselves in an industry dominated by big names

The Eastern Townships is, and has been, home to many talented musicians, yet their art is often lost in the flood of products that dominate the airwaves, presenting significant challenges and barriers to a music career.

Fannie Gaudette teaches music at both Champlain College and Bishop’s University. With a passion for music—often accompanying other artists as a musician or writing accompaniment to songs—she decided to step into the spotlight as a singer-songwriter with the release of her debut album, “L’invention humaine” at the start 2022.

The singer was quickly forced to confront the harsh realities of the music industry. Her biggest challenge, she said,  was trying to understand the “complicated” industry.

As a French singer, Gaudette pointed out particular struggles faced by those entering the Quebec music scene, which has slowly become overshadowed by foreign artists with the globalization of music. Artists can no longer rely on labels to become known through radio or TV as streaming has become more common.

“There’s no longer anyone who knows the recipe for success,” the songwriter said. “Even big music companies are struggling and take poorer care of their artists. Everything is working at a slower speed.”

Frankie Kobelt, who studied at both Champlain and Bishop’s and now resides in Montreal is also pursuing a music career as a sideline. Her first single came out in 2022 and her EP, “Characters from a small town,” was released earlier this year.

Kobelt currently has written many songs that she would like to record, but has to save up as each song costs around $1,000 to produce, excluding an annual subscription to DistroKid for streaming distribution. “Recording a song, if you want it really properly done, is expensive, so you have to save up,” she said.

A challenge for Gaudette is balancing her music career and her family life within the spare time she has outside of her teaching hours at the college and university.

Gaudette has produced a new show titled “Une vie” which she believes would interest many, but the struggle becomes building a platform and a following so people will go to see it. Becoming known entails TV appearances or performing with established artists, which can be impossible with the biggest companies having a monopoly, leaving little room for indie artists to grow.

Her strategy has thus been to collaborate with other musicians to become known within their fanbase. She mentioned a song recorded with Albin de la Simone, a French artist, set to release within the coming year.

“It’s not enough. My promo team told me that when I release the song in France, I need to have shows in France. If people like you, they’re going to see you in concert and if you come back a year later, it’s too late and they’ll have forgotten the song,” said the singer. It’s like “putting together 1000 pieces.”

Kobelt said one of her strategies has been “busking,” performing in metro stations, which can be done by getting a permit from the STM. “It’s awesome. There’s a lot of freedom in it, people stop and talk to you, you meet a lot of people, and I get a lot of followers through that,” she said. Word of mouth has also been a way to get listeners.

Gaudette noted that with all the songs she’s released and her participation on other artists’ songs, she makes approximately $26 per month. On Spotify alone, over nearly four years, Gaudette believes she has only made around $20 in total for her album.

“I make more money from people buying CDs at my shows. That’s what has given me the most money, a lot more than the [streaming] platforms,” she explained. She also gets money through side contracts like advertising campaigns and others wanting original music created for them.

It’s become normal for music to be free, which can de-incentivize people from paying for music and concerts. “There are so many free concerts during the summer, people see everything they want to see and spend the winter in front of Netflix and don’t pay to go to a concert,” said the Bishop’s teacher.

Another form of support for Gaudette has been grants from the Canadian and Quebec governments. “I’ve been really lucky because more than 75 per cent of my requests have been accepted,” she acknowledged, explaining that to get the grants, the process of creating the project must be started so there are two or three demos to send with the application. “You already need to invest before even applying, so that’s a cost for the artists.”

It can take up to five months to get an answer, with the majority of applicants not receiving money to support their endeavors. Awaiting an answer that receives a negative response is the most challenging aspect of the process for Gaudette, as she would have musicians waiting for her to start the project but there’s no revenue to get started.

Money has also been Kobelt’s biggest challenge as her musical projects are entirely self-financed. She hasn’t made any revenue from Spotify, pointing out that it’s preferrable to purchase music when possible (a feature on Apple Music). “That’s why so many artists have merch—it’s so that they can make money. You must have high numbers to make money from streaming.”

However, she doesn’t have time to manage merch or apply for grants while pursuing her main career of being a singing teacher. Instead, she saves up to move on to the next project.

“I’m a bit worried for my students who want a music career, because you can’t survive from it,” the Bishop’s teacher said, adding that students performing in bars and concert halls are making less money now than she did when she was their age.  

Facing the music Read More »

Think you’d like to be a mayor or councillor?

What exactly would that entail?

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

The next municipal elections are set to take place on Nov. 2, with some 8,000 councillor roles to be filled, according to the Quebec website.

Roles and responsibilities

In essence, the duties of elected municipal officials are to ensure the proper function of the city or town and the proper functioning of services. Among the jurisdictions of municipalities are waterworks, housing and social housing, culture and leisure, community activities and parks, emergency services (police, firefighting, emergency measures), environment, roads, transportation and local economic, community and cultural development.

The responsibility of elected officials is to represent the interests of citizens while serving the best interests of the municipality. A councillor must attend council meetings, participate in decision-making, vote on all bylaws and, for some, sit on committees.

Many committees are on an MRC or inter-municipal level, especially in small towns. These include police, garbage pickup, etc. Locally, there may be committees for communications and culture. There is also the mandatory Urban Planning Advisory Committee (CCU).

“[A councillor’s] role is limited to the council. Outside of the council, there is no power on the municipality and no power to make decisions. Often, they are also involved in many committees. During the rest of the time, they are a citizen,” explained Jacques Demers, Mayor of Sainte-Catherine-de-Hatley and president of the Fédération québécoise des municipalités (FQM).

Mayors must preside over meetings to maintain order and decorum, participate in decision making, signing decisions into law, supervising the application of these bylaws and oversee the work of the municipality. They are also given the right to take emergency measures in situations that put citizens at risk, and they have the power to veto a decision made by the council (though it may be reversed if a majority of councilors re-adopt the measure).

Mayors can intervene at all times, but they are not the “real” boss of employees, said Demers. That is the role of the municipality’s general director. In emergency situations, such as black ice on roads, they can make a quick decision with the director. Bigger projects that are done over time and require investments must pass through the town council for councilors to vote on.

Salaries

The salaries of elected officials depend on what titles they hold and vary by municipality. In Sherbrooke, for example, since 2023, the mayor earns $174,278 annually while councilors are paid $44,961.

Presidents of boroughs, committees, offices and the deputy mayor get additional renumeration. Borough councilors in Lennoxville’s Uplands and Fairview districts are paid $16,734.

In smaller towns, even the mayoral position may be part-time. According to the FQM president, some 80 per cent of people in municipal government have side jobs. “In more than 75 per cent of municipalities, the mayor earns less than $25,000 per year,” he said.

Becoming involved

“I’ve always been involved since I was very young,” Demers shared. “It’s a level of government that I like a lot. When we make a decision, whether it be roads, infrastructure, firefighting, police, it’s concrete, we see the results next day or the next week. We can see what’s happening.”

He urges anyone interested in running for town council to attend a council meeting to better understand the process, decorum and roles they have.

“Sometimes, people are disappointed. They realize that to solve a problem, power is limited around the table,” the FQM president expressed. “Sometimes councillors come in thinking they’re the boss of employees, but no, that’s the job of the general director.”

It is possible to find training and explanatory videos and documents on the Ministère des Affaires municipales et de l’Habitation’s website.

“The strongest councils are those which are the most diverse. Not only men and women, but among age groups, as well. We should also have youth from 18 to 30 years old,” opined the mayor.

Running as a candidate

A last virtual information session will take place for anyone wishing to understand how to run, learn about the responsibilities of councillors, the administration and jurisdictions of a municipality and get additional resources Sept. 3 at 7 p.m. Sign up is required and can be done on the government of Quebec’s website, on the municipal elections 2025 page.

To run in a municipal election, a person must be on the electoral list of their municipality, be 18 years old or older, be a Canadian citizen, be able to vote, reside on the territory of the municipality upon sending their candidature and not have engaged in election fraud.

In addition, a candidate must reside in the municipality for at least six months before the election (May 2, 2025) or be the owner or occupant of a business building for at least 45 days (Sept. 18, 2025).

If eligible, the person must get a declaration of candidature from the chief returning office of the municipality. The document will specify the post desired, represented party (if applicable), signatures of support.

Candidates must collect a given number of signatures based on the number of people who reside in the municipality. A prospective mayor must get between five and 200 signatures. A councillor must get between 5 and 25 signatures.

Applicants have until Oct. 3 at 4:30 p.m. to submit their candidatures. After this point, if a candidate runs unopposed, they will automatically be declared elected.

Following the elections, a person’s mandate begins as soon as they have been sworn (maximum 30 days after being elected). They must also declare their financial interests (which may cause conflicts of interest) and undergo mandatory training on ethics and professional conduct. All election signs must be taken down by Nov. 17.

Tense environment

Some 10 per cent of municipal elected officials quit their post within the last four years, resulting in 24 municipalities having to be administered temporarily by the Commission municipal Québec.

Data received from Élection Québec reveals that since the past elections, 1,082 councillor and mayor seats have become vacant, including 99 in the Townships, which resulted in 79 byelections (up to Dec. 31, 2024). Bas-Saint-Laurent took the lead with 176 vacancies, followed by Chaudière-Appalaches with 162.

A CMQ report following a request for mediation on behalf of the Sherbrooke council in Feb. 2024 found that disrespectful behaviour and personal attacks led to a toxic environment. Two councillors resigned from important roles as the Société de transport de Sherbrooke president and executive committee chair. Councillors had reported inefficency, micromanagement and a lack of transparency within the city governance.

In response, a committee was established to propose solutions to the problems including the prioritization of the CMQ recommendations to favour an environment more prone to progress and respect.

Think you’d like to be a mayor or councillor? Read More »

Scrap the Referendum?         

Well attended public information meetings in Richmond are becoming a thing

By Nick Fonda

Local Journalism Initiative

A few months ago, the Town’s urbanist, Francesco Cappai and the town’s director general, Mario Mayette, organized a last-minute meeting with two dozen residents of Thomas Street to address concerns about Bylaw 350 which concerned a zoning change.  On Aug. 5, they drew twice that number to a scheduled meeting to outline Richmond’s Bylaw 337, which would do away with the right that citizens have to ask for a referendum in questions of urban planning.   

Bylaw 350 proposed a change to zoning regulations governing a large, empty field on Thomas Street.  The change would have permitted as many as 170 housing units to be erected on what, until recently, was agricultural land.  When the residents of Thomas Street heard of the proposed zoning change, they were alarmed.  While the parcel of land might accommodate a large housing project the narrow road leading to the site would be unable to accommodate the traffic generated by 170 new households.  The homeowners on Thomas Street were quick to mobilize. Had it been necessary, they were prepared to ask for a referendum to ensure that their voices were heard.  As it turned out, they were able to meet with the Town urbanist and director general and express their concerns.  At the following council meeting, the Town’s elected officials—responding to unambiguous public sentiment—abandoned the proposed zoning change.

That was in June.  Since then, several Thomas Street residents have started attending Richmond’s monthly council meetings.  One resident, Paul Massé, has announced that he will be running for the District 1 seat on town council in next November’s municipal elections.

At the July council meeting, Bylaw 337 was mentioned and the initial reaction of those in attendance was positive.  The bylaw, which runs to 37 pages of text (including the appendices) and is written in legal language which, for the average layman is almost indecipherable, outlines a consultation process.   At the council meeting, it was not mentioned that adoption of the new consultation process also meant that the citizenry would simultaneously give up the right to ask for a referendum.

It was only when the proposed bylaw, available on the Town of Richmond web site, was examined more closely that the loss of recourse to a referendum was discovered.  A single line on the first page of the document announces that the proposed consultative process replaces the right to a referendum.  No explanation or rationale for abandoning the referendum process is offered.  (Unique to Quebec, referendums have been an accepted method of settling civic questions for almost a century.  Expensive to administer, they are relatively rare.  A decade ago, when the issue was water fluoridation, the Town of Richmond proposed to hold a binding consultation rather than a referendum.)   

The Aug. 5 meeting was announced in L’Étincelle, the local guaranteed circulation weekly.  Despite this, many of those in attendance heard about it by word-of-mouth only a day or two before.  While such information meetings are part of the Town’s regular protocol, they are normally held in the Town Hall council chambers.  Having received a letter asking that the right to referendum be maintained signed by over 80 citizens, this meeting was moved to the community center.

Some four-dozen people turned out to hear what Bylaw 337 was all about.  In a cavernous space with poor acoustics, the Town urbanist outlined Bylaw 337—a document drawn up by the provincial government—and presented it as a democratic process designed to better permit the municipal government to serve the population.  The citizenry could be consulted on various topics including the environment, land use, culture and social development.  The consultation process could include questionnaires, polling, focus groups, public meetings, and suggestion boxes.

Given the length of the proposed bylaw, it’s not surprising that it had some seemingly quirky provisions, for example, no consultation process could be held less than 44 days before a municipal election.  No doubt, there is a good and valid reason for such a provision.

In the question period following Francesco Cappai’s presentation, over a dozen people stepped forward to either ask questions or make suggestions.

No one spoke in favour of the new proposed consultation process.  Several of those who spoke affirmed a strong desire to maintain their right to request a referendum.

Not that anyone spoke against consultation.  On the contrary, those present welcomed consultation and if anything, bemoaned the fact that there hasn’t been more consultation in the past.  It was pointed out, for example, that when the Town was contemplating the zoning change on Thomas Street, the councillor for that district did not take the time to knock on a few doors to ask how homeowners felt about the proposed change.

Another speaker expressed skepticism.  It’s fine to consult but what assurance is there that concerns and suggestions will figure into the final decision?   It’s too easy for the consultative process to become nothing more than window dressing and easily ignored.  A referendum has the advantage of making clear how the majority feels about a particular issue, even if that majority is a very slim 50 per cent plus one.

More than one speaker questioned why the town could not, on its own, adopt a policy of consulting the population without depriving it of its right to referendums.  It was pointed out that a number of municipalities in the province have adopted their own consultative policies while maintaining the recourse to referendums.

One of the more interesting points mentioned was that the Order of Urbanists of Quebec has pronounced itself in favour of maintaining the citizens’ right to a referendum.  This, despite the fact that a referendum, because it is often limited to a smaller population, can promote the interests of a few over the wishes of the many.   For example, only Quebecers voted in the Quebec referendum on separation even though all of Canada would have been affected had the vote been a yes.  Still, despite the possibility that the tail might sometimes wag the dog, the Order of Urbanists views the right to referendums as guardrails that should be maintained.

Equally revealing is the fact that Quebec has been encouraging municipalities to adopt its consultative legislation since 2017, yet very few places have opted to do so. 

Exactly why Richmond is considering this now is not clear, although the current economic and political climate may be the principal factor.   While many would suggest that we should be curtailing our activities so as to minimize the damage we are doing to the environment, government and industry are advocating to fast-track everything from housing starts to new pipelines.  Abolishing the recourse to referendums in favour of consultation is seen as a way to streamline the approval process for new projects.

The Aug. 5 public meeting was orderly even if some of those who spoke were giving voice to deeply rooted emotions.   As property owners and citizens, they have a vested interest in their community and how it grows.  Some of the questions and comments reflected an underlying current of mistrust.  All who were present would welcome more consultation but none seemed willing to give up on the right to request a referendum.  Among those in attendance were at least four town councillors.  It will be interesting to see what they took away from the Aug. 5 meeting and just how they will vote when Bylaw 337 comes up at the next council meeting—a meeting which is likely to draw a much larger crowd than council meetings normally do.

Scrap the Referendum?          Read More »

Endangered by one’s own thoughts

Society and the chambers of echo

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

According to data published by the International Telecommunication Union of the United Nations, there are 5.5 billion internet users in the world, which corresponds to some 68 per cent of the global population, as of 2024. According to Statistica, this year, there are an estimated 5.42 billion social media users.

These platforms are powered by algorithms that classify posts based on type, content, and style, often using artificial intelligence. Users are then presented with posts and videos based on what they have previously interacted with, which the algorithm believes the user would enjoy.

What are echo chambers?

This leads to a phenomenon known as “echo chambers.” Sylvana Al Baba Douaihy, a researcher at the Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en cybersécurité (CRICUS) at the University of Sherbrooke defines them as “a system or environment in which people will be exposed principally to information and opinions that confirm their beliefs or pre-existing points of view.”

There are a few signs that can be noticed to become aware of the presence of an echo chamber in one’s social media feeds. The specialist pointed out that if a person does a lot of research on a certain topic on a regular basis and the topic of interest starts appearing in the content they see on social media, this is one of the signs. She characterized it as being content oriented around expressed interests.

“When we always see the main information and the discourse doesn’t differ, that’s when you can notice you’re targeted by algorithms and in an echo chamber,” shared the university professor. “We are in a homogenous informational space.”

Anyone can be exposed to this phenomenon as it stems from web searches, though people that repeatedly look for the same information online may be more prone to being trapped in a such chamber.

Consequences of echo chambers

The specialist outlined many of the consequences of the phenomenon, political, societal and individual. One is the separation and polarization of society. “There will be a marked separation between the groups within the same society,” she explained. “They will nourish political, linguistic, ideological and religious divergence.” This may even lead to the radicalization and dehumanization of groups.

Another important impact is the spread of disinformation. This is the voluntary spread of false, biased or manipulated information with the goal of influencing people’s perspectives. “It is manipulation of public opinion,” Douaihy summarized.

In recent years, this has led to the propagation of misogyny and hate against certain groups and politics, according to Douaihy. “We see this loss of critical thinking that leads to a negative impact on society and democracy,” she shared, adding that a loss of diverging opinions and ideas that can be shared freely stretches the limits of democracy. When a person is trapped in an environment without being confronted with perspectives other than theirs, they lose they capacity to think rationally and autonomously while questioning and validating the reliability of sources and data. “We are no longer able to doubt ourselves or recognize the opinions of others or our capacity to deeply analyze,” Douaihy said.

The escape

The good news is that there are certain escape plans that users and society can perform to reduce their vulnerability to and the presence of echo chambers. The main ones are prevention and awareness.

“We need to reinforce debate in society to be able to discuss all subjects in an autonomous and free way.free way to be able to express oneself and guarantee freedom of expression,” Douaihy stated.

It’s also important to develop critical thinking by reading and exposure to pluralism. Citizen participation to encourage debate and openness to other ideas could also be a method. The professor added that “digital hygiene,” understanding how the platforms and their algorithms work as being oblivious to their functioning leads to fully being trapped.

People must, when being exposed to information, look to verify it through reliable sources. “Not through content that is structured or developed by artificial intelligence,” she shared.

Some social media platforms, like Instagram, have a settings option to reset suggested content, which may break the cycle of the echo chamber.

Online hate and anonymity

Online anonymity, the state of hiding a person’s real-life personality, can also lead to the spread of online hate. On a technical scale, anonymity can be achieved by using a VPN to mask the user’s IP address and deactivating “cookies” that collect and share information for advertising purposes, said Marc Frappier, the scientific director of the Pôle d’expertises en cybersécurité at the University of Sherbrooke.

“A VPN is an intermediate server through which you pass to access internet,” he explained. “So, the websites that you visit see the IP address of the intermediate server rather than your personal IP address.”

However, some VPN services that are offered as “free” may use a user’s device as a proxy—the device used becomes a VPN itself for other users. Access to the IP address can then be sold online, allowing criminals to have Canadian IP addresses for fraud, etc.

“The opacity of the cyberspace can drive internet users to adopt behaviours that can be anti-social,” said Douaihy. “Sometimes, internet users can destabilize a certain balance in the community—those are trolls. They can pass themselves off as someone else in the goal of manipulating and sharing offending or even violent rhetoric on social media.”

This can lead to online hate and cyber-intimidation—using online communication as a way to harass, threaten or bully someone, which can lead to serious mental health consequences for the individuals affected.

Keeping personal data secure

Frappier outlined some of the best ways to stay safe and keep personal data secure while using the internet. One of the main things to do is to always ensure the legitimacy of websites and apps that are consulted or downloaded.

There are many phishing (fraudulent) emails sent claiming to be a service that a person may use such as a bank, which can utilize website names that resemble the official ones. A good practice is to bookmark important sites using the correct links, that way there is no need to pass through a potentially fraudulent link received by email.

An anti-virus should also be used. “It protects you from the installation of certain malicious programs, including when you receive attachments by emails,” said Frappier. He also reiterated the importance of doing security updates on the device.

It’s important to have passwords that are hard to guess. “We need to have a different password for every site, that’s very important. If you have the same one for many sites, if it gets stolen, the attacker will see if it’s the same on many sites,” the professor shared.

Using a password manager can be an interesting solution, as they store and can generate long and intricate passwords for every website consulted. While it isn’t impossible for hackers to access the manager, the risk is very low, he explained. “When you look at the risk management, it’s better to have different solid passwords for every site than not using the manager and get passwords stolen.”

Endangered by one’s own thoughts Read More »

Recycling

Bryan Laprise
Consignaction deposit location at 1900, Belvédère Sud accepts unit or bag return

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

In a world with an increasing number of products and types of containers and wrappers, it can be hard to identify what should be disposed in what bin. Or should it be put in a bin at all?

The Record spoke to Hélène Dauphinais, president of Récup Estrie’s governing board and Jean-François Lefort, vice-president of corporate affairs at Consignaction to get a better understanding of how the recycling system works in Quebec.

Recycling: how it works

Récup Estrie is the organization responsible for the sorting of recyclable matter for Sherbrooke, the MRC of Memphrémagog, Coaticook, Haut-Saint-François,Val-Saint-François and des Source’s—some 200,000 people.

Since the start of 2025, Éco Entreprises Québec (ÉEQ) has been responsible for the recycling system throughout Quebec but  because Récup Estrie already had the infrastructure to collect and sort what citizens put in their green (or blue) bins, ÉEQ subcontracted it for the region it covers.

The basis of the system is that citizens put recyclable materials in their recycling bins at home, which is then collected and brought to a sorting facility. It then passes on conveyor belts and optical sorting systems sort out different materials. In addition to the machines used in the process, employees also sort items and operate the mechanized systems.

Common materials are brought together in bales which are collected by ÉEQ for them to sell. Prior, Récup Estrie has been in charge of selling the bales it created.

What’s accepted?

To quote the Bin Impact campaign from ÉEQ, the general rule for what goes in the recycling bin is “Containers, packaging, printed paper.”

This includes paper and cardboard as well as containers and packaging made out of glass or metal.

It is best to rinse or wash containers before throwing them out, according to Dauphinais. “There are parts of the sorting chain in which people have to remove things from the chain. If it’s dirty or starting to rot because it spent a week in the bin, remember that there are people working on those chains. Also, when it’s hot at the factory, imagine the odours caused by unrinsed containers.”

Materials like Styrofoam, while recyclable must be brought to ecocentres. At the sorting facility, Styrofoam is not sorted. It tends to crumble and can even damage the machinery.

All plastic containers can be put in the recycling bin, no matter the type. However, assembled plastic, such as toys, cannot be put in the bin as it is not a container. It must be brought to the ecocentre.

Other materials such as cloth and textiles are not accepted in the recycling bin. There are other places to recycle them, such as Récupex boxes around Sherbrooke, which collect and reuse the material.

“If someone hesitates about whether something goes in the recycling bin, most times, it doesn’t go in the bin,” said.

There are websites and apps that can help people know what goes in which bin. For example, Ça va où? from Recyc-Québec, is available online and via an app. It offers services in French and in English.

Contamination

If a person puts items that are not accepted at the sorting facility in their recycling bin, the truck won’t be turned away, since most people it services follow the sorting rules correctly.

“On a road, there might be a person or two that will have put things that shouldn’t be put in the bin,” said the Récup Estrie president.

Upon arrival, the truck unloads everything it collected, and it is put onto the conveyor belts. The most frequent consequence of having unaccepted materials collected is machine blockages. This might lead to breaks or lost time.

According to Dauphinais, upon reception, there can be piles of material to sort up to five or six people high twice a day.

For the Estrie sorting facility, approximately 15 per cent of the material that passes through the factory is rejected and sent to the dump.

It is important to properly sort residual matters, as an item might be recyclable, but won’t be accepted in the recycling bin. If something that should’ve been sent to the ecocentre makes its way to Récup Estrie’s sorting facility, it will ultimately be sent to the dump.

Collection

Everything is weighed during the process. Récup Estrie goes through 30,000 to 32,000 tons of recyclable matter every year.

Dauphinais shared that in recent years, the volume of matter treated is gradually decreasing, despite a growing population.

“This means that probably, the companies that produce packaging, greatly reduce the amount of cardboard they use, for example. Producers compact the packaging at the maximum,” she said.

Another example is reducing the thickness of plastic bottles and other containers. She doesn’t believe that this shift is attributable to a decrease in recycling habits among the population. In places like Sherbrooke, garbage pickup isn’t very frequent in certain parts of the year, which forces people to put waste in the correct bin to have enough room.

Refund system

Quebec’s deposit-refund system for drink cans and bottles has been undergoing modernization since 2023. When buying beverages with a deposit, the cost is automatically added at check-out and is returned to the consumer upon bringing them back to stores to recycle at the counter or machines.

Since March of this year, all plastic ready-t0-drink beverage containers have a 10-cent deposit. Previously, only soft drinks had a five-cent deposit, but now, water, sparkling water, juice and milk bottles are among those included in the system.

“The system is undergoing a transformation. One of the biggest obstacles are the habits developed over the last 40 years. Those are going to be transformed in the coming months and years,” Lefort stated.

Before modernization, 2.5B containers were collecting. The new goal is 5B by the end of modernization. The system allows for a closed system with very little contamination, allowing for 100 per cent recycling of all containers, unlike at the sorting center.

Compacted aluminum, plastic and carton containers are sent to Sorel-Tracy for sorting. Bales of each material are made and sent out to recyclers. Plastic is sent to Joliette, where pellets are created to make new bottles, while aluminum is sent to the United States as volume to have a similar factory in Canada isn’t profitable. Glass is treated in Saint-Jean and then sold to partners.

Consignaction has been opening up locations for container return (including express bag return by using the app) across the province, including two in Sherbrooke (1900 Belvédère S, 4857 Bd Bourque #27). As before, returns are also possible at convenience and grocery stores.

Recycling Read More »

Education cuts affect student health and development

Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

According to Mélissa Généreux, a professor in the Université de Sherbrooke’s Faculty of Medicine and Health Services, recently announced budget cuts to the education sector could bear many consequences for students.

School is one of the primary factors that contribute to the development of youth, shared the professor. It is a place that also enables physical activity and the creation of friendships and healthy lifestyles.

“It’s quite evident that the school environment, where we spend 12 years of our life, becomes not only a place where we learn, but an environment where we develop, flourish and grow. We learn, develop interests and hobbies, we create connections. It’s really a place that has a big influence on the health, development and wellbeing of kids,” Généreux stated.

Every aspect of a school’s services can directly influence its students, from the school menu to activities offered. The professor provided the example of school grounds. If there is space and equipment for the kids to play sports, such as soccer or basketball, it can influence their level of physical activity (and thus, their health), the friendships they make and their ability to socialize. “The more inviting spaces there are to socialize and play, the more infrastructure and materials there are, counts a lot.”

Not only does this include outdoor space for play and sports, but indoor spaces as well, for activities like arts and crafts and theatre.

“What scares me about the cuts, is that these are among the first things that will be cut,” Généreux said.

She mentioned the school grounds near to where she lives. Previously, the basketball court was run down, the nets were falling apart, and the pavement was uneven. Two years ago, it was redone with a fresh—even—coat of pavement, new nets and lines on the ground. Généreux said that this fundamentally changed how students used the facilities.

Not only do the kids play basketball during school hours, but they also play after school ends. The professor explained that it also revived neighborhood life. Now, there are impromptu tournaments between people living in the area while others sit by the court to watch.

“There was really a unifying effect. It makes kids physically active, brings them off of screens and makes them socialize. Just with two basketball nets, there was an incredible impact on a whole community, so it shows that every time there’s a decision to improve—or not improve—school grounds, there can be a domino effect on the wellbeing of youth,” explained Généreux.

A crucial aspect of the extracurricular programs offered in schools is the personnel that take time to organize activities for the benefit of students. If their workload increases with personnel cuts, they may no longer have the time nor energy to make these clubs or activities happen, even if there may not be direct costs associated to them.

This may especially impact more reserved students who are more at ease in small-group activities such as a chess club. Nonetheless, these require staff and space, which may not be possible amid cuts.

With fewer support staff in classrooms, teachers will have to deal with more disruptions whichi will be detrimental to the rest of the class.

For some students, school can act as a security net, where kids from families and neighborhoods all have the same opportunities, creating social equality.

A general expectation is for students to arrive at school ready to sit down, listen and learn. However, some students need extra support to make it to the same place as their peers, from difficulties in reading, comprehension, maintaining attention or expressing themselves.

School services allow for those students to acquire necessary life skills, such as dealing with emotions and maintaining a social network. These include homework help, speech therapy, special education, psychology and psychoeducation. According to Généreux, these are “completely essential”  for students with learning challenges.

“If these services are cut, it can increase the inequalities between the youth that upon arrival have more challenges than others. […] In my opinion, with Quebec values, everyone should have the same chances and support to go through challenges,” she said.

Long-term deprivation of these services may, for some students, lead to more failures in school, decreased motivation and self-esteem. In turn, some students may drop out of school and not reach their full professional potential.

Dropping out of school can affect an individual’s critical thinking skills and leave them without some of the civic literacy skills acquired in school on how to be a good citizen.

“If cohorts of students are more at risk of dropping out, not learning as well and not developing their critical thinking, slowly, it can lead to a society that is less educated, less literate with a smaller capacity to have a critical view of what happens in everyday life,” predicted Généreux, mentioning the current polarization of views on issues like healthcare and the environment.

The professor pointed to cultural trips to places like a museum. While some schools may be able to ask parents for financial contribution to make outings possible, more disadvantaged sectors may not be able to do the same without government support.

A poorly maintained building would also bring its share of consequences for students. From water leaks that could cause mold to outdated windows, insulation and ventilation that could lead to lower levels of air quality.

Generally, the professor views cuts to education as cuts to health. There are many prevention and awareness campaigns in schools that lower the demand and strain on the healthcare system. If these initiatives are reduced, it could lead to bigger consequences.

“I hope that the government realizes that by doing this, ultimately, this will lead to bigger psychosocial and health problems. Someone will pay the price, but with graver consequences, and, probably, higher costs,” finished Généreux.

Education cuts affect student health and development Read More »

Youth unemployment on the rise

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

Statistics Canada’s Labour Force Survey for May 2025 revealed that while general employment rates held steady, unemployment among returning students aged 15 to 24 was on the rise, reaching 20.1 per cent, 3.2 per cent higher than the same month last year. This is compared to May 2022’s record low of 11.4 per cent. The survey is based on a sample size of 100,000 people each month.

Fabian Lange, chair of the Department of Economics at McGill University, who has done a lot of work relating to unemployment and the labour market, explained that this is primarily due to a strong labour market during the pandemic.

“In the years up to Covid and the period between 2021 and 2022, the labour market was very strong. We had a lot of job vacancies, so, essentially, this was a period of a lot of hiring across the board,” Lange told The Record.

One of the reasons behind such a strong labour market, demonstrated by the record youth unemployment of 11.4 per cent in 2022 is that there had been a long period without a “major recession.”

During times like these, young people benefit the most from this phenomenon as they are usually leaving school unemployed. On the flip side, they also are among the first affected in slowed hiring rates.

This is a demonstrated pattern that youth is more sensitive to changes in the labour market and job availability, according to the professor.

“I don’t think we can speak of a weak labour market quite yet,” he pronounced. “It’s just falling back to historically appropriate rates. Overall, employment rates are still pretty good.”

This is in part because productivity growth is not as strong as before and increased economic instability.

One of the biggest changes mentioned in the report is a 22 per cent reduction in the number of returning students finding work in accommodation and food services. Lange pointed out that this data may be based on a very small age sample.

However, he hypothesized that this industry would be the first affected by a slowed spending rate. “Going to a restaurant, going to hotels, going on vacations, that’s one of the first things to cut back on,” Lange said.

He also noted that young people may strive to work in high-wage professions. “I think that’s a good thing, but they’re going to be drawn away from food and accomodation,” said Lange. Since the pandemic, people have been shifting away from working in this industry due to typical low wages.

According to Lange, it’s likely we will face a recession given the current trade uncertainty. This will affect unemployment rates, at first among youth. Historically, when students graduate from school during recession years, they enter the workforce with lower wages and lower employment rates.

“The first job you find after school, it will determine where you get placed on the job ladder, and that has a consequence on the jobs you find consequently,” Lange added. This would affect young people for a long time. He expects that if a recession were to happen, youth would return to school for more training amid an uncertain labour market.

Patricia Dionne, a Université de Sherbrooke professor who studies professional integration also points to the tariffs as a possible cause for higher unemployment.

“The tariff policy makes it that businesses are more reluctant to hire new people. It particularly impacts young people as they are more vulnerable to an unpredictable labour market,” Dionne said.

She said that research shows young people want to work and it’s an important value for them.

Dionne noted that it’s important for employers to actively recruit. She recommends youth facing difficulties finding a job to visit organizations that can help them, such as Carrefour jeunesse-emploi de Sherbrooke.

Youth unemployment on the rise Read More »

Bus Carriers Federation gives $12M bill to government

Quebec reauthorizes purchase of conventional buses

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

The Bus Carriers Federation handed the Quebec government a bill totalling $12,024,000 June 11 for 137 bus carriers in the province with electric buses which run at a loss.

The Bus Carriers Federation represents three-quarters of private carriers, mainly for school buses. Its president, Luc Lafrance, said that “[they] are not against the electrification of school buses, but to force all carriers to solely purchase electric buses was perhaps done too quickly.”

In 2021, the government ruled that bus carriers could only purchase electric vehicles when renewing their fleet.

Lafrance maintains that for the government’s electrification goal to be achieved, carriers need financial support for the purchase and maintenance of these vehicles.

According to the Federation (FTA), governmental support for electric buses decreased from $12,900 to $5,000 per route. A press release states that an electric bus costs $14,000 more to operate than one that runs on fuel such as diesel. The FTA is asking the government to pay the $9,000 difference for some 1,336 electric buses owned by member carriers.

In the Eastern Townships region alone, 96 buses from member carriers, represent a $864,000 loss.

Pierre Tourville is the president of Autobus B. Dion, which operates five schoolbus carriers. It has around 100 buses in its fleet including six electric, running routes for the Centre de services scolaire des Sommets, Centre de services scolaire de Sherbrooke. It also has a small contract with the Eastern Townships School Board for three minivans in remote sectors.

“[We] require more spare vehicles than in the past. Last fall, I had six electric buses, but I didn’t stop using any conventional buses. So I need more vehicles to do the same amount of work,” said Tourville during an interview.

Additional costs for running electric buses include longer delays for maintenance and repairs, delays for electric equipment such as charging stations and more expensive parts.

He told The Record that one of his electric buses got into a minor accident in early February and repairs are yet to be completed due to missing parts, while a diesel counterpart would have been fixed the same week.

In most cases, when an electric bus needs to get repairs, it is necessary to call the manufacturer, Lion Electric for technological support, which can entail longer delays as well.

When it comes to the equipment and infrastructure needed to charge the buses, the government covers an initial 75 per cent, according to Tourville, and the other 25 per cent is passed on to the carrier.

“That electric equipment, there’s maintenance that comes with it. I have colleagues that have charging stations similar to mine, and after 12, 16 or 24 months, they needed to be changed, so it’s not guaranteed. It’s not a ten-year investment,” he said.

Without adequate governmental support, electric vehicles aren’t worth it. The president claimed that they cost more than they bring in.

“In light of the information I have today, I won’t buy any more electric buses. With the subsidies we have, it’s not profitable. I’m not going to make more purchases knowing that there are shortfalls,” Tourville added.

Lafrance added that some carriers, who were unable to make the investment or didn’t have sufficient knowledge on the technology preferred to tough it out with their fuel buses.

Transitioning to electric vehicles also requires a different way of thinking, such as planning routes with lower autonomy, planning ahead for the building of charging stations. Some bus drivers, whose rural routes are far from the carrier’s centres may keep their bus at home, which is likely impossible with electric counterparts that require powerful charging equipment.

According to Tourville, diesel buses have a capacity of around 900 kilometres, while electric versions range between 150 and 200 kilometres. Their vehicles cover between 100 and 200 kilometres per day.

“It’s decent, but in some situations, it’s not enough. If we want to avoid charging between the morning and the afternoon, it’s something we have to think about.” he said.

In general, while they have few problems during the winter, there are still more than during the summer. Tourville also revealed that to maintain decent autonomy during colder months, the electric buses’ heating systems run on diesel.

Changes to legislation

Previously, buses were changed every eight to 10 years. But now, the government will allow carriers to use buses for 14 years, and will reauthorize the purchase of fuel vehicles amid an expected shortfall of buses for the coming fall, which would leave many students without transportation after the announcement on June 11.

“This rule change takes into account the current challenges related to the autonomy and availability of electric buses and minibuses, and to prevent service breaks for school transport,” the Ministère des Transports et de la mobilité durable said in a statement sent by e-mail.

While carriers will be able to renew their fleets after the instability in the electric market with Lion Electric’s financial problems, conventional buses have increased in price.

“We’re talking about a 60 per cent increase in recent years, so the carrier’s revenues will not be able to pay these prices,” Lafrance said.

He added that without extending the lifetime of buses to 14 years, there would have been 1,300 buses that could not be used at the start of the 2025-26 school year in Quebec.

The FTA is asking the government to renew its incentives and support for the purchase of electric vehicles to make it attainable for carriers to add them to their fleets.

Lafrance mentioned that many of the school bus carriers in Quebec are family-owned and now in “the second or third generation.”

They request that the government not only reimburse the $9,000 shortfall on buses for this year, but amp up the funding for the next years, as well.

Bus Carriers Federation gives $12M bill to government Read More »

Revisiting the riveting 1995 referendum

Courtesy

By Guy Rex Rodgers

Local Journalism Initiative

Thirty years ago this October, Quebec held a referendum on sovereignty.  After the ballots were tabulated 2,308,360 Quebecers had voted yes and 2,362,648 had voted no.  Everyone old enough to have lived through the bruising battle for independence retains vivid memoires.

The 1995 referendum was the final round of a series of constitutional negotiations that embroiled the entire country from the Meech Lake Accord in 1987 to the Charlottetown Accord, which received the approval of the federal government and all 10 provincial governments, but was rejected by Canadian voters in October 1992.  Disappointment and frustration set the stage for Quebec’s 1995 referendum on sovereignty, a bitterly contested campaign for the future of Quebec and Canada. The referendum is remembered in sound bites and headlines: lobster traps, a federal love-in, allegations of stolen votes, threats of partitions, and the infamous ‘money and the ethnic vote.’

I wonder how many voters remember the referendum question from 1995? It was clearer than the cautious, 106-word question of 1980, which had requested a ‘mandate to negotiate’ sovereignty-association, while promising that ‘any change in political status resulting from these negotiations will only be implemented with popular approval through another referendum.’  The 35-word question of 1995 was more direct. ‘Do you agree that Quebec should become sovereign, after having formally offered Canada a new economic and political partnership under the bill respecting the future of Quebec and the agreement signed on June 12, 1995?’

The referendum question spawned a multitude of ancillary questions. Some of them pragmatic: what if Canada does not accept the offer outlined in the June 12 agreement? Other questions were existential: what if a majority of Quebecers votes yes, but the minority who votes no refuses to leave Canada?  Divorces are rarely simple or collaborative.

The philosophical question raised by the referendum was simply: why? Why are we doing this? In the case of a divorce, the reason is clear.  “I am so unhappy in this relationship that I am prepared to endure almost anything and lose almost everything to get out of it.”  Some who voted for independence were adamant that any price was worth paying to free Quebec from its intolerable relationship with Canada.  And yet the agreement signed on June 12, 1995 outlined a ‘partnership treaty’ whereby Canada and Quebec would ‘share power’ over trade, monetary policy, citizenship and use of the Canadian dollar.  The 1995 referendum proposed a revised partnership rather than a divorce. 

A cynic could infer that the Parizeau-Bouchard-Dumont plan was yet another variation of Yvon Deschamps’ ‘independent Quebec within a united Canada.’  A realist would observe that history and geography make it inevitable that Quebec will collaborate on multiple levels with its nearest neighbours.

The philosophical question remained: why?  Every book I have read that promotes Quebec’s independence begins with the Conquest of 1759, perceived as a brutal and humiliating loss for the inhabitants of Nouvelle France. The underlying reason for independence is to undo the damage of the Conquest. The dream is to liberate the descendants of Nouvelle France from the Conqueror and restore pre-Conquest culture and language.  Would sovereignty-association or a renewed partnership treaty with Canada erase the Conquest?  Would political autonomy for Quebec remove the English-language and its influence? Current polling shows Quebecers are far more favourable toward bilingualism than a 3rd referendum.  

Thirty years probably gives us enough distance to reflect on the 1995 referendum with some objectivity.  I am conducting a research project and inviting people to share their memories of 1995, their reaction to the outcome, and thoughts about the 3rd referendum that the Parti Québécois is promising to hold if they win next year’s election. This research is connected to work I have been doing to investigate education in Quebec.  Many readers of Townships Weekend have filled out the education survey and I have enjoyed fascinating and informative conversations with you. I’m sure you have vivid memories of 1995 and strong thoughts about a 3rd referendum. I invite you to take a few minutes to fill out a short survey at the following url. I look forward to hearing from you.   https://tinyurl.com/surveyOuiNon1995

Revisiting the riveting 1995 referendum Read More »

We don’t need no education

By Nick Fonda

Local Journalism Initiative

The announcement that half a billion dollars was being cut from Quebec’s education budget was greeted with a mixture of shock and dismay (Record, June 20).  The all too plausible reason, as explained in Sharon McCully’s editorial (June 25), was a correspondingly large and unexpected expense incurred by the government’s auto insurance program (SAAQ) that had to be covered.  When the shoe fits…

Still, a question remains:  why cut from education?  If money has to be found, why not cut a percentage—the same percentage—from all of the bureaucracy’s budgets and cover the cost that way?  Why take the $510M needed for the SAAQ from education? 

Just to put half a billion dollars into context, the Quebec government’s budget for 2025-26 is $130.6B.  Of this sum, $57B goes to health care and social services while $19.8B goes to public education with another $8.9B going to higher education.  Together, health and education represent about two-thirds of the province’s spending.    As well, Quebec has a $13B deficit, so trimming half a billion is easy to justify.  And while half a billion dollars is a lot of money, it is a mathematically modest 2.5% of the public education budget. 

Modest as the cut is, the question remains, why cut from education? 

One possible answer comes from data compiled by the Fraser Institute.  In 2021-22, Quebec invested more money educating its youth than any other province, spending an average of $17, 374 per student.  At the other end of the spectrum, Alberta spent $13, 421 per student, only 75 per cent of what Quebec spent.  Cutting half a billion dollars from the education budget puts Quebec’s per-student costs closer to the norm while still leaving it near the top (if not still at the top) in terms of spending on education.

A second, and less plausible, answer might be deduced from the perception that François Legault’s CAQ government is taking a business-like approach to education.  In business, a job well done is rewarded with a bonus.  A job poorly done is examined to find the flaw and correct it before putting more money into the venture.  If the education budget has been cut, is it because public education is, in some way, falling short?  For that matter, how exactly can something like public education be judged or evaluated? 

About 20 years ago, I was a classroom teacher with three decades of experience. 

I lived through what I refer to as the Great Dumbing Down (GDD).  This was a shift of seismic proportions that turned the concept of learning on its head.  It occurred over a span of more than a dozen years and began with the introduction of a new methodology with its own jargon.  What had previously been referred to as English became English Language Arts, which certainly sounds impressive.  Changes to the English curriculum were followed by changes to Math, and all the other subjects, right down to Phys Ed.  The GDD began in the 1980s and culminated with the full implementation of the Quebec Educational Reform at the turn of the 21st century.  Despite the name, the new education system had nothing to do with Quebec.  It was an American initiative and it spread to most First World countries.

I had the experience of watching kids learn both before and after the GDD. 

Before the GDD, classroom furniture consisted of desks arranged in rows with every child assigned to his own desk.  Post-GDD classroom furniture consists of chairs set around tables that accommodate anywhere from three to six or more students.  Pre-GDD, if the classroom wasn’t perfectly quiet, there would be only one person speaking, most often the teacher.  After the GDD any number of people will be talking at the same time, often (but not always) in their quiet voices.  Teachers, pre-GDD, frequently repeated the instruction, think for yourself!  Post-GDD, their most common refrain is, how do the others in your group feel about that?

Textbooks changed.  Pre-GDD Grade 5 Math textbooks included a chapter on adding fractions.  The method was concisely explained:  find a common denominator, convert the fractions to that denominator, add the numerators but not the denominators, and convert your answer to a mixed number.  This was followed by a couple of examples:  to add one-half and two-thirds convert the factions to three-sixths and four-sixths; add three and four to get seven- sixths, and convert that improper fraction to one and one sixth.  The rest of the chapter was all addition problems—pages and pages of fractions and mixed numbers to practice adding. 

The chapter on adding fractions in Grade 5 Math textbooks at the turn of the 21st century was quite different. The textbooks themselves were in larger formats than their 20th century counterparts, but with fewer pages.  They were printed on glossy paper and, unlike the older books, the post-GDD texts were full of eye-catching graphics.  One or two pages would be taken just to visually introduce the topic.  The instructions—artfully enhanced—would take another page or two rather than a half page in the old textbooks.  There weren’t as many pages of problems to work on as in the older books, and there weren’t quite so many problems on those pages.

If practice makes perfect, Grade 5 students pre-GDD had five or ten times as much chance of achieving perfection. 

Before the GDD, the high school leaving Composition exam lasted three hours.  Half of the marks on the exam were earned on right-or-wrong answers.  For example, a student would be asked which, among eight or ten short samples, were sentences.  He would then be asked to change the sentence fragments into complete sentences.  He would be asked to parse some sentences, and show that he knew the meanings of certain words.  The other half of the exam asked for one short and one longer writing sample in two different modes:  narrative, expository, persuasive, or personal essay.

After the GDD the same exam was administered over several of days.  The right-or wrong part of the exam—wonderfully unambiguous for teachers to mark—was dropped.  The composition exam still asked for writing samples but these had to go through a peer editing process and then a re-write.  Teachers had to judge the student’s final draft but also take into consideration the changes and improvements from the first draft.

Judging a piece of writing is a dicey affair at the best of times.  A piece of writing might be brilliant, but if the reader isn’t receptive, he won’t rate it highly.  By way of example, the first Harry Potter novel was turned down by several publishers before it went on to make J.K. Rowling very rich and famous.  In the pre-GDD days, asking students to show their knowledge of grammar, or the extent of their vocabulary, was a way to compensate for the writer who was up against an unreceptive reader.

As to whether the Ministry of Education is doing a good job, the answers are all anecdotal.  One comes from a professor at Bishop’s who pointed out that his students can’t read any more.  Another comes from a factory owner who needed a manager to oversee an operation that employed 400 people.  After interviewing a dozen candidates with MBAs, he hired an English major with an M.A. because he needed a manager who could write and analyze.  A third comes from a teacher just starting out who said, I have a degree in Education but I feel as if I don’t know anything.

Not that any of this anecdotal evidence proves that the education system isn’t doing what was intended.

In the first half of the 20th century, many people still lived on small farms.  Many more people than today were self-employed or operated small businesses.  They had to be resourceful, able to solve their problems quickly and efficiently.  They had to think for themselves. 

Today we have big corporations, multinationals, and the 1%.  Employees are hired (when robots aren’t available) to do a job, not to think. 

Is it possible then, that the Ministry of Education is not doing a good job and simultaneously doing exactly the job it set out to do?  And how could that explain a 2.5% cut?

No, it’s easier to stick to the Fraser Institute’s study and bet that cutting half a billion dollars from the education budget was doing no more than bringing Quebec more into line with what other provinces are spending on schools. 

It was just happenstance that the half a billion dollars cut from education was exactly the sum needed to cover that unexpected shortfall at the SAAQ.

We don’t need no education Read More »

Tell It Like It Was

Courtesy

By Guy Rex Rodgers

Local Journalism Initiative

The past really is a strange place. Over the past few weeks, I’ve had the opportunity to visit it in the company of Quebecers who started school here between the Second World War and Bill 101 in 1977. They have been sharing stories about their education experience as part of a research project I am conducting.

Most of us know that before Quebec began transitioning to linguistic schools in 1997, we had denominational school boards based on religion.  However, I spoke to one man who attended English Protestant school in Rosemount during the 60s but didn’t realize until middle age that his school had been ‘denominational.’ It had simply been the local school where ‘everybody’ went.

Other people have vivid memories of religion and education. Quebec’s French Catholic school system began turning away immigrants in large numbers after the Second World War. This was partly because the Baby Boom filled schools to the rafters, and partly because record numbers of immigrants arrived, although the English Protestant and English Catholic systems succeeded in integrating large numbers of immigrant children while struggling to manage their own Baby Booms.

It is an established fact that French Catholic schools did not accept non-Catholics. Thousands of Jewish students were sent to the English Protestant system.  It is also an established fact that French Catholic schools did not accept Protestants, which included Greek students, although Orthodox theology was closer to Catholicism than any form of Protestantism.   It is not an established fact –  indeed it is still highly controversial – that French Catholic schools turned away thousands of Catholic students because they were immigrants. 

A tidal wave of Italians arrived in Quebec after the Second World War and, according to available data, the percentage of Italian students who attended English schools grew from 25% (1941) to 75% (1971).  What was going on? School records shed no light on whether Italians were increasingly attracted to English schools or increasingly turned away from French schools. That is one of the reasons we are conducting research.  

A woman whose parents fought to get her into a French Catholic school was shocked that all the teachers were nuns. Back in 1950s Italy, the education system employed professionally trained lay teachers. Her parents moved her to an English Catholic school so she could get more education and less religion. Another woman remained in a French Catholic school but founded the constant emphasis on religion disturbing. She told a strange story about a nun who died, and then her mortal remains were exposed in the school for a week.

A number of Jewish students who arrived from French-speaking countries tried to get into French Catholic schools but were turned away. If there are any exceptions to this ‘rule’ I would love to speak to them.  In the meantime, I am happy to speak to students who followed the familiar path of enrolling in the English Protestant and English Catholic systems.

One aspect of the education story unfamiliar to me was the French section within the Protestant school system. Originally it was created for a smaller number of Huguenots, but during the 1960s French-speaking immigrants from the Maghreb arrived in Quebec. Turned away from the French Catholic system, many enrolled in French Protestant schools. They were followed by Haitian immigrants who were also Francophone but not Catholic.  The French Protestant system grew to be quite large.  This is a particularly interesting and little known part of Quebec’s byzantine education system. I would like to speak to more people who experienced the French Protestant educational environment.

The unintended consequence of creating so many alternate forms of education was that untold numbers of students were educated in English (Protestant and Catholic), and growing numbers were educated in the French Protestant system. This left the majority of Catholic French-speakers segregated and isolated.  Everything changed in 1977 when the PQ hastily implemented Bill 101.  All immigrants, even English-speakers, had to attend French schools.

Educators trained to teach Francophone children suddenly found their classes filling with immigrant children whom they could not understand, and who could not understand them.  Classes d’accueil were only implemented later.  “They didn’t teach us French. They taught us math IN French, and we couldn’t understand anything!”  It was brutal, like emergency surgery without anesthetic. Many of the guinea pig children of Bill 101 still bear the scars. 

This is a complex story that can only be understood through lived experiences.  If you were educated in Quebec – in any of the school systems: English, French, Catholic or Protestant – please take a few minutes to fill out the Quebec School Question survey via this link.  http://tiny.cc/QSQ

Tell It Like It Was Read More »

Cell phone ban in schools to take effect in September

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

The Commission spéciale sur les impacts des écrans et des réseaux sociaux sur la santé et le développement des jeunes (CSESJ) published its official report on May 29, including 56 recommendations relating to the use of screens including social media and video games, and in an educational context, among youth.

The commission was created by the National Assembly last year and has been inquiring into the topic in order to create recommendations for government legislation. At the end of April, an abridged version of the report was released which included the recommendation to ban the use of personal mobile devices (cell phones) in elementary and high schools. The government moved quickly on the recommendation, announcing a cell phone ban in schools to take effect for the coming school year.

The CSESJ held two public inquiries, surveyed 7000 respondents in three months and visited 17 schools spread across 13 cities in six regions. MNAs involved came from four parties: seven from the CAQ, three from the Liberal Party and one from both Québec Solidaire and the Parti québécois.

“In the face of these numerous challenges, we quickly realized that it was imperative to propose concrete and realistic solutions to favor the well-being of the youth to let them flourish and develop a healthy relationship with the digital world,” Amélie Dionne, president of the CSESJ, said during a press conference on May 29. 

Screens at school

On May 1, the Minister of Education announced that starting during the next school year, students would be prohibited from using their cell phones on the school grounds during the school day, including during breaks and during lunch.

In the survey conducted by the CSESJ, school personnel were asked questions. Some 67 per cent responded that they totally agree that banning cell phones is a good way to increase student attention, backed by almost a quarter saying they somewhat agree. Nearly two-thirds ‘somewhat agreed’ that teachers should limit the use of screens, even when used for pedagogical purposes.  

At school, the commission recommends the use of digital devices to be more strictly regulated and used purely for pedagogical purposes and should not be used as a reward for positive student behaviour.

The CSESJ believes that rules governing digital citizenship—how students should use digital media and conduct themselves online—should be included in schools’ codes of conduct, citing that it would be a good way to make students and parents aware of good habits to adopt.

The study also found that school personnel believe they are inadequately trained in how to efficiently use technology for pedagogical purposes. Some 60 per cent answered that they were at least somewhat insufficiently trained in this regard.

The Eastern Townships School Board (ETSB) has not adopted a specific policy on cell phones since the adoption of the ban, citing a lack of government guidance. According to ETSB Chairman Mike Murray, the ministry has not provided specific guidelines and none are expected.

School boards and schools are therefore left on their own to figure out how to effectively ban cell phones in their establishments. “We have held off trying to make rules in the absence of guidance, because we run out of options,” he said.

Since the beginning of the 21st century, the ETSB has welcomed technology into its schools. It now provides a laptop to students to do work on, which can serve some of the same functionalities as cell phones.

“We think that, in general, wall-to-wall bans are bad. The idea of a ban ignores a whole lot of realities,” said Murray during an interview.

He pointed out that the ETSB covers a large area and a “widely dispersed population.” Cell phones can be used for better communication with parents, especially in cases where they need to know when to pick up their children.

The chairman also expressed concerns about who is supposed to reinforce the ban: “The whole downloading of responsibility, onto who in the school? Teacher? School secretary? Classroom aid? Everybody in the school?”

By banning cell phones, Murray thinks that it will simply move things to a new technology, such as using the school-issued laptops, or passing notes instead of texting. There will still be distractions, but just in a different way.

The ETSB is not looking at reducing its reliance on screens and technology, according to the chairman. “Whatever they are doing to overuse screen time is far more an issue of parenting and guiding and so forth,” he said, adding that parents are the ones that provide cell phones to their kids. “It’s the parents who decide whether there are restrictions to screen time.”

Data and advertising

The members involved in the commission are also concerned with the protection of young users’ data on online platforms, and the minimum age required to have accounts on social media and the hidden commercial advertisements that reach teenagers and kids through influencers.

CSESJ member Alexandre Leduc of Québec solidaire spoke about the need to make a “nuanced” analysis of the consequences related to the use of social media, good and bad. He highlighted it makes communication among youth more convenient, provides opportunities for creativity and self-expression.

However, it is recommended for the minimum age required to hold a social media account to be 14-years-old, in line with some of the province’s other laws granting those of this age the right to more responsibility, including medically. Many platforms already require similar age requirements, which are often not followed.

The commission also recommends making it illegal to sell the personal data collected of online users below 14-years-old and to target advertisements towards them. They would also like to see micro-transactions within video games (such as items that can be purchased in the gaming world) banned for minors.

There needs to be more transparency about what an advertisement is to help youth easier distinguish between what is or what is not trying to tell them things, including by influencers. The CSESJ recommends the government more strictly regulate the work of online influencers in this respect.

Alternative activities

Among the recommendations were many regarding the implementation and promotion of screen-free activities at low costs for families.

The report’s first recommendation is to optimize the accessibility of existing infrastructure such as parks and school sports facilities, in the goal of encouraging youth to participate in physical, social and cultural activities.

Raising awareness

A part of the report rests on the importance of raising awareness of the negative effects of screens on youth, among the younger generation themselves, but also among parents and teachers.

“Raising awareness in the population among youth and parents is an important first step in being more aware as to the risks of the digital world and to encourage a change towards healthy lifestyle habits,” Dionne stated.

During the press conference, the commission also noted that while most kids spend too much time on their devices, parents are also frequently on them. Members said that during their visit to schools, students often pointed out being asked to spend less time on screens even if their parents spend as much time on them as they do.

In the report, they cite an elementary school student saying: “My mom asks me to put away my tablet while she’s on her phone. She repeats it without even noticing that I wasn’t on my tablet anymore.”

They therefore claim that an awareness campaign is important to improving public health. 

Health services

The CSESJ points out that addiction to screens presents many of the same symptoms as other addictions, such as to drugs.

To combat this, they make many recommendations relating to the healthcare system, such as implementing psychological services for youth presenting signs of addiction.

Their report also recommends providing training personnel, including those working in the healthcare and education systems about the use of screens and the risks associated with it.

Explicit content

Since the dawn of the internet, sexually explicit content has been made more accessible.

Data shows that nearly one-third of youth in Canada have encountered this type of content, most between the ages 9 and 13.

The report recommends Quebec work with the federal government and others to impose restrictions on platforms that distribute sexually explicit content and to put in place “reliable, unavoidable age verification mechanisms that are respectful of private life.”

Sending a message

While it may be difficult, or people may break the rules to set up an account if even they don’t meet the age requirement, the recommendations made by the commission send a message to the population of Quebec.

“It sends a signal of public health that this is what the norm should be,” Leduc said during the press conference. Comparing it to people drinking alcohol before turning 18 or driving above 100 km/h on the highway, he thinks that these recommendations, which may become law, show how people are expected to behave, even if they don’t always follow the rules.

Cell phone ban in schools to take effect in September Read More »

Getting “Milked” at checkout: Quebec’s new deposit on milk containers

By Greg Duncan

Local Journalism Initiative

I’ll be heading out to the grocery store today to buy some milk with receipt and milk jug in hand to claim my deposit on my milk jug. Yes, you heard or read that right, a ten-cent deposit on the milk jug itself. These days, with grocery prices being so astronomical, I check store receipts scrupulously to make sure that items match up with any marked specials that I have so carefully shopped for and should have been applied at checkout. We all know that an item often may be listed as ‘on special’, but once at the cash register, that special price hasn’t been applied somehow.  I’m that guy in line that makes sure that I am in a proper position to view the item prices as they are scanned and tallied. Regardless, things have slipped by me before and this time I did not notice a mystery item until I got home and surveyed my store receipt for good measure before tossing in the recycling bin as I always do.  And there it was, an item listed as a “consigne” with a price of 0.10 that followed the $4.69 I paid for a 2-litre plastic container of milk. I was surprised by this and exclaimed, since when is milk subject to a “consigne” or a deposit? It seems however that this has been happening since March of this year. Horror of horrors, I thought, how did I miss this? As mentioned, I’ve yet to test Quebec’s “new milk jug return system” but will be doing so toute de suite.

What I found when I started researching is that as of March 1, 2025, the province has expanded its deposit-refund system to include plastic ready-to-drink beverage containers, from 100 ml to 2 liters, including milk cartons. While the goal is to encourage recycling and reduce waste, some consumers like me feel like they’re being “milked” for extra cash. The 10-cent deposit per container means shoppers pay more upfront, though they can reclaim the amount by returning their empties.  For years, Quebec’s deposit system has covered beer and soft drink bottles, but now, the government is taking a broader approach. By 2027, nearly all beverage containers—including wine bottles and multilayer cartons will be included in the deposit system. The reaction has been mixed. Some consumers appreciate the environmental benefits, while others worry about the inconvenience of returning containers. Businesses are also adjusting to the new system, ensuring they comply with regulations while managing customer concerns.  Will this new deposit system truly encourage better recycling habits, or will it just feel like another hidden cost? Time will tell. What’s your take on it?  You can find more information at: https://consignaction.ca/en/les-bouteilles-de-boisson-en-plastique-maintenant-consignees.

Courtesy

For now, I leave you with a simple, but refreshing and timely recipe for a “Quebec” Milkshake that may help the new upfront deposit on your milk container go down easier.

Strawberry- Raspberry-Maple Milkshake

Ingredients

  • 1 ¾ cup raspberries 
  • 2 tbsp. raspberry jam
  • 2 tbsp. maple syrup
  • 2 tbsp. water 
  • 1 cup frozen strawberries 
  • 2 cups of milk 
  • 2 scoops of softened vanilla ice cream
     

 Preparation

  1. Warm the raspberries with the raspberry jam or jelly and 2 tablespoons of water in a small saucepan set over a medium heat until soft and juicy, about 4-5 minutes.
  2. Spoon most of the raspberry mixture into a blender. Spoon most of the remaining raspberry mixture into a tall serving glass; reserve about 1 tablespoon for the garnish.
  3. Add the frozen strawberries, milk, maple syrup, and one scoop vanilla ice cream to the blender. Cover and blend on high until smooth and creamy.
  4. Pour into the glass and top with another scoop of ice cream as well as the reserved raspberry mixture. Serve with a straw.

Getting “Milked” at checkout: Quebec’s new deposit on milk containers Read More »

Staying safe as a pedestrian and cyclist

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

With the summer peeking out of its springtime hiding spot and forecasts calling for a warm summer, it may be tempting to go out for walks or bike rides throughout the city or on some of the region’s many trails. However, there are a few rules and tips to follow to make sure that every leisurely stroll doesn’t occasion safety risks.

Biking rules

According to the Highway Safety Code, cyclists and pedestrians have rules to follow.

In general, cyclists must ride on the right side of the road, while being cautious of car doors that might open. They can only ride elsewhere to turn left, if it is permitted to ride against traffic or if it is absolutely necessary.

Just like cars, bikes must yield the right of way to pedestrians as they are more vulnerable.

While bikes don’t have turn signals, it is necessary to signal intentions when turning. To turn left, the signal consists of raising the left arm outwards. To turn right, either raise your left arm upwards so your elbow forms a 90-degree angle or extend your right arm outwards.

Cyclists must ride in a single file line when in groups and only 15 cyclists can be part of a group before a new one must be created.

At the sight of a school bus with its flashing lights activated, cyclists must, like cars, wait at least five metres from the bus.

It is prohibited for cyclists to ride on highways or exit ramps, against the flow of traffic unless a sign explicitly indicates that it is permitted, on sidewalks, unless authorized by signs (in this case, it is important to ride slowly and give way to pedestrians). Cyclists cannot ride between two lanes of moving vehicles, apart from when the right lane is reserved for turns in that direction. They cannot wear earphones or headphones, use a portable electronic device, view a display screen unless it is relevant to riding, integrated into the bicycle and positioned so it can easily be seen. It is also prohibited to drink alcohol or use drugs while riding a bike, to carry a passenger unless there is a specific seat for them.

There are fines in place for cyclists that do not follow the law. Failure to obey to safety lights and their signs can result in an $80 to $100 penalty, Not yielding the right of way to pedestrians, wearing ear- or headphones, using a portable electronic device, not signaling intentions and riding two people without an additional fixed seat can result in a fine of equal amounts.

Pedestrian rules

Like other users of the road network, pedestrians also have rules to follow. They must use sidewalks or walk against traffic.  They must cross at intersections and pedestrian crosswalks by properly checking both sides of the road. It is against the law to cross an intersection diagonally. Penalties for not obeying the Safety Code can result in a fine from $15 to $30.

Mechanical requirements

To ride safely there are mechanical requirements in place, such as having reflectors on the front and back of the bike to be visible when it’s dark.

“Having a bike in good condition is essential for both comfort and safety,” said Magali Bebronne, program director at Vélo Quebec, an organization which has, since 1967, promoted the use of bikes.

It’s also a good habit to check that both tires are well pumped before hitting the road or trails, to avoid having a flat tire.

According to the Safety Code, it’s mandatory to have a properly functioning brake on the back wheel.

There are bike repair shops throughout the Townships which can inspect all bike parts to ensure they’re in good working order and fix any issues. In Sherbrooke, this includes Sports 4 Saisons, Tech-Sport, and Nouveau Cycle.

The City of Sherbrooke also has bike repair stations throughout its territory where cyclists can fix their bike themselves. The stations are equipped with tools to loosen or tighten the bike’s components as well as remove the tires. A map of all of these stations is available on the city’s website.

Habits to adopt

“Another good habit for cyclists to adopt, is staying visible,” said Bebronne, citing the importance of having reflectors on bikes.

To be more visible, riding in a straight line and avoid zigzagging between open parking spots is important.

 “Unfortunately, in Quebec, we have a culture that ignores pedestrians’ right of way. So, at crosswalks, it’s up to drivers and cyclists to yield the right of way to pedestrians as soon as they indicate the intention to cross the road,” explained Bebronne.

By following the laws set by the Highway Safety Code, it becomes easier to anticipate what other users of the road will do, she added.

Bebronne noted that cyclists must also be careful near bus stops, as the drivers cannot always see them coming as it’s hard to hear them approach the vehicle.

“I think that pedestrians and cyclists should be the closest allies because they use the ‘softer’ methods of transport, so we need to take care of each other,” concluded Bebronne.

Quebec has many trail networks including La Route verte, which is made up of 5300 km of biking trails throughout all of the province’s regions. The Trans Canada Trail also passes through the Eastern Townships in Magog, North Hatley and Sherbrooke.

Eastern Townships Tourism’s latest guide includes pages about bike touring throughout the region. It also published a special cycling guide with a map of the area’s 24 biking routes. They can be consulted online at easterntownships.org.

Staying safe as a pedestrian and cyclist Read More »

Water quality in the Eastern Townships

Record Archives
Zebra mussels in Lake Magog

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

For decades, local non-profit organizations have been monitoring water quality in the region’s key bodies of water. For decades, poor water quality has been a major concern which has repercussions on public health.

Memphremagog Conservation (MCI) is a non-profit organization founded by three residents at a time the water quality of Lake Memphremagog was poor due to agricultural practices, logging and a lack of wastewater regulations. Today, it looks at the complete watershed to find solutions to protect the lake and its quality.

Some of its key projects include the conservation of land to protect the area around the lake and its watershed, working with municipalities, the provincial government and industries around the lake to make a complete portrait of the Memphremagog watershed.

“Not only do we have to look at the watershed, but we have to explain the importance of the riparian buffers,” explained Johanne Lavoie, volunteer present at MCI, who has been involved in the organization since 2008.

Riparian buffers are strips of land beside waterways that contain various trees, plants and shrubs. They act as a barrier between the land and water, partially filtering pesticides, waste and nutrients, strengthening the land to avoid erosion while also providing a habitat for marine and terrestrial life.

Zebra mussels

According to the Invasive Species Centre, zebra mussels can be found in freshwater throughout Canada, including Quebec, Ontario and Manitoba. They originated from the Black Sea but were brought to Quebec from the big transport vessels on the St-Lawrence.

“Zebra mussels are an invasive species that take the place of native species by taking over the space where plants, rocks and where fish lay their eggs. Then they [filter] huge amounts of water leaving no food for the fish and other species around them,” explained Laurence Renaud-Langevin, the general director of Bleu Massawippi, during a phone interview.

The organization has been around since 1968 with the goal of protecting the water quality of Lake Massawippi. One of the organization’s main projects relates to the containment of zebra mussels, which first appeared in Lake Massawippi in 2021. In November, diving operations were conducted to retrieve them from the lake. Since then, there have been hundreds of days of diving to contain the issue.

The species also makes water more clear, making the sun go deeper down into the bodies of water. This increases the growth of underwater vegetation, such as algae. According to the Government of Canada, they cause millions of dollars in damage annually by clogging water treatment plants and damaging watercrafts.

“Zebra mussels are the perfect example of the loss of biodiversity,” said Lavoie.

They were discovered in Lake Memphremagog in 2017 and since then, the problem has only gotten worse. According to the MCI president, the presence of zebra mussels in the lake was caused by a lack of control of the equipment that was brought into the lake without being washed.

“An adult mussel lays between 30,000 to 1,000,000 eggs per year,” she explained. “The numbers are growing, we cannot do much about it, but we can make sure that other invasive species do not come into the lake.”

It is important for any equipment used on a lake to be washed before being used on another body of water to avoid the spread of species such as zebra mussels which were not previously present in that area.

Other big issues facing Lake Massawippi in particular include repeated rain. “It washes the surrounding land. Everything will come into the lake,” added Renaud-Langevin. Some of their other projects include protecting the watershed and fighting blue algae.

Bleu Massawippi is also on the hunt for alternative funding to continue their zebra mussel collection process. They’ve previously received grants from the government which aren’t renewable. Currently most of the organization’s funding comes from private donors which include the lake’s residents and different businesses.  “We don’t have any recurrent funds, every year we have to start at zero,” said Renaud-Langevin.

Forever chemicals

Forever chemicals are a class of thousands of man-made substances used in different products which have been found to affect human health including the development of cancer. Technically known as per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), there have been growing concerns about regulating these toxic chemicals.

“The Coventry dump site is the only dump site in Vermont,” said Lavoie, referring to the waste treatment plant close to the southern part of Lake Memphremagog near Newport. “We know that this is a pollution source that we have to look at.”

The lake provides drinking water to 185,000 people in the Eastern Townships, according to the MCI president, throughout Sherbrooke as well as parts of Magog, Potton and Saint-Benoit-du-Lac.

The dump site produces leachate (contaminated water from a dump site). It is not supposed to leak into the lake, as it is now trucked to different locations or treated on site. However, there is data that indicates that there are PFAS in the water near the dump.

“If we wait until the numbers and the concentration of PFAS are too high into Lake Memphremagog to act, it’s going to be too late,” Lavoie shared. “That’s why we are looking closely at the dump site to ensure the leachate does not ever come back into our watershed and that the treatment over there is secure.”

According to Lavoie, there are also PFAS flowing into the lake from the use of wastewater to irrigate fields. There are many different places from which these substances can enter. It’s important to make sure there are regulations in place to protect the water from these toxic chemicals.

The MCI president noted that many years ago, there was also a dump site near the lake on the Quebec side, but it was closed down around 15 years ago out of concerns for the water quality. “We’re asking the U.S. not to pollute us also,” she expressed.

According to Lavoie, there are reports showing there are cancerous fish and other species in the lake, for which the cause is currently unknown. However, she said that it is a testament to Memphremagog’s water quality.

Support

On May 22, Liberal MNA Virginie Dufour tabled Bill 995 which aims to regulate PFAS in Quebec. It does not propose regulations to PFAS but would mandate the government to study the situation and then create appropriate regulation. According to her, there is currently no regulation in place to regulate these forever chemicals in water nor in sewage sludge. It would force municipalities and landfill operators to test for these chemicals to ensure the environment is not getting contaminated.

“The standards [in regulations] in Quebec are not good enough,” Lavoie stated. In 2024, Health Canada published its objectives for the maximum presence of PFAS in drinking water, setting it at a total of 30 nanograms per litre for 25 substances. “If at least Health Canada guidelines would be applied, that would be great. Let’s start from there and then we’ll see.”

She clarified that PFAS groups together thousands of substances, so the regulations could always be better.

Lavoie also expressed that the collaboration of both Canada and the United States to make sure that similar guidelines which protect the water quality of the lake would be very beneficial.

It’s possible to support organizations such as Bleu Massawippi and Memphremagog Conservation in their mission to protect local bodies of water by becoming a member.. This way, they get some funding and new voices to share a new vision of the organization. Some also organize activities open to the public.

According to the director general of Bleu Massawippi, having a good water quality is “directly linked to public health.” By having high quality, people can enjoy their life and be healthier longer. She also added that when a lake’s water quality worsens, the real estate value of surrounding property also goes down. 

Water quality in the Eastern Townships Read More »

Anglo workers being sidelined in Quebec, says report

By Bryan Laprise

Local Journalism Initiative

A survey conducted by Léger on behalf of the Comité consultative des Québécoises et Québécois d’expression anglaise (CCQEA) revealed that around 32 per cent of employers in the province have changed their hiring practices as a result of Law 14.

Law 14, also known as Bill 96, reinforced the province’s position that French is the only official language of Québec. In addition to provisions that make French the predominant language on all signs and posters visible from outside of businesses and limiting the number of students that can attend English-language schools, it extended francization efforts to businesses of 25 employees or more.

Avoiding anglophones

The survey gathered responses from 500 employers. One in five expressed concerns about hiring English speakers and one-tenth pulled back from their retention of English-speakers or even terminated their employment. They cited concerns with complying with the latest regulations and the risk of penalties.

“Employers need clarity and support in navigating these requirements. Right now, they’re pulling back out of caution. That’s a missed opportunity,” CCQEA President John Buck stated in a press release.

Government-funded francization programs are available to meet the requirements set out by Law 14, but less than one-fifth of employers are aware of them, with fewer participating. The cost of training employees poses a challenge for some businesses. Many employers are left without the tools they would need in order to take advantage of qualified potential workers.

According to the full report published by the CCQEA, 45 per cent of companies that participated in the Leger survey had never hired English-speaking employees. This is particularly the case in Francophone businesses.

A third of employers reported changing their hiring practices due to Law 14. Fourteen per cent by being more cautious, 10 per cent by reducing hiring and eight per cent by not hiring English-speaking candidates.

“I can’t say that we are surprised,” said Sylvia Martin-Laforge, director general of TALQ, formerly the Quebec Community Groups Network (QCGN. TALQ is an advocacy organization for English speakers and other organizations. She explained that there has been “anecdotal evidence” on the effects of the legislation.

“It’s terrific that finally, a credible survey validates what we have been saying to this government for six years,” said Martin-Laforge. For the past six years, the TALQ and other organizations have spoken to ministers from the government about how English speakers face barriers in the Quebec labour market, according to Martin-Laforge.

Hiring English speakers

English-speakers are much more likely to be hired by English-language companies, finds the survey. Eighty-eight per cent of such companies had hired English speakers. Around three- quarters of bilingual companies surveyed had hired Anglophones. Companies in the Greater Montreal area averaged 70 per cent.

Some 41 per cent of companies responded to the survey their main reason for hiring English speakers was qualifications. This is above 29 per cent saying that the reason is to serve customers in English and 26 per cent for the need to use English in certain positions.

Companies that say that they’ve never hired English-speakers cite the need for French to complete the work (38 per cent). Not many English-speakers in the company’s regions and a lack of applications from that language group are equal at 26 per cent of companies.

“Often, it’s through family or connections that you find out about jobs. If you are not in a network, you won’t know about the jobs or be referred for [them],” said Martin-Laforge about the major challenged faced by English speakers. “The structure of the labour market is not easy for an English-speaker to get into. It is exacerbated by the laws that many employers don’t understand.”

According to her, there is a lot of linguistic insecurity for English-speakers who have lost confidence in their ability to speak Quebec’s predominant language even though they are perfectly capable of doing so, saying: “Most English-speaking Quebecers just need to bone up on their French. That’s it, that’s all.”

“These laws [such as Bill 84 and 96] that talk about identity, the need to speak French, the need to be French, the need to be a part of the French culture create an environment where English speakers looking for jobs in Quebec feel disenfranchised or feel that they might lose their jobs. It creates instability,” she explained.

Positive impacts of English speakers

A strong majority of employers who have hired English-speaking employees say it was a positive experience. Only two per cent of employers said the experience was negative. Three-quarters of the businesses that have hired English-speakers say that they’ve seen benefits, such as improved bilingual service, access to more talent, increased cultural diversity and access to new markets.

“In a time where there is a labour shortage in all sorts of sectors, this is not the time to start imposing coercive measures that are not tested,” opined the TALQ director. According to her, the francization programs which could help English-speakers join the labour market amidst more restrictive regulations are not understood nor available enough.

Employers who participated in the survey were asked to provide what they felt was the best strategy to better integrate English-speakers in into the provincial labour market. Nearly one- third thought it would be helpful to have more accessible language training programs, one- quarter said it would be for governments to incentivize hiring English-speakers and one-fifth said it would be to change the laws altogether.

In fact, according to Martin-Laforge, the push to better integrate English-speakers into the provincial labour market will eventually come from employers themselves. “There will come a time where people will say: ‘We just want the skills, we don’t care what language they speak,’” hypothesized the director general. She thinks this will come out of a necessity to have enough—and competent—staff to keep businesses open and be able to serve all potential customers.

“We have to speak to the Chambers of Commerce and provincial bodies to demonstrate what they’re missing out on with all of these able-bodied, smart people who maybe don’t master French. Anybody who doesn’t speak French might have the skills, we’ll just help them speak French. But in this climate of fear, it’s not a good look for the next 5, 10, 15 years for the economy of Quebec,” concluded Martin-Laforge.

Anglo workers being sidelined in Quebec, says report Read More »

Francophone schools still adapting to CAQ reforms

By Ruby Pratka

Local Journalism Initiative

Four years ago this month – on June 15, 2020 – Quebec’s 61 francophone school boards became service centres when Bill 40 came into effect. The bill eliminated elected school boards, replacing them with service centres run by appointed volunteer boards of directors. When the bill was first tabled in 2019, then-education minister Jean-François Roberge argued that eliminating school board elections – which the vast majority of voters did not vote in, particularly in the francophone sector – would save the government $45 million over four years. In 2023, Roberge’s successor, Bernard Drainville, spearheaded Bill 23, which gave the minister the power to hire and fire directors general of service centres and to override their decisions; that bill takes full effect on July 1. 

Neither bill has yet been applied in the English sector. Elected school boards remain in place in the English system due to an ongoing legal challenge led by the Quebec English School Boards Association (QESBA), who argue that ending school board elections for the sector infringes on the community’s Charter right to control its education system. Earlier this spring, a Quebec appeals court panel unanimously backed QESBA; however, on May 30, The Record learned that the Quebec government intended to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada. In the short term, Eastern Townships School Board (ETSB) chairperson Michael Murray has said, this means business as usual for English boards while the case is adjudicated; in the long term, should the court accept to hear the case and rule in the government’s favour, service centres could replace elected boards.

Townships Weekend spoke with a teacher’s union representative and a spokesperson for a school principals’ association to find out what has changed in the French sector since the bill passed.

“It has changed certain things, but not as much as we expected,” said Sophie Veilleux, president of the Syndicat de l’enseignement de la Haute-Yamaska (SEHY), the union which represents teachers in the Centre des services scolaires de Val-des-Cerfs (CSSVDC) service area. “It was supposed to reduce bureaucracy – which I haven’t seen – and reduce politicization – which I haven’t seen either. The central point was to give more autonomy to schools … but that’s not what happened;  the directors and service centres have lost lots of power, and the minister decides practically everything.” 

“We used to have the [elected] council of commissioners, which was replaced by the board of directors, but the board of directors is not what’s making a lot of the decisions. We’re not decentralizing anything.” Veilleux said it’s harder for school service centres to enact decisions adapted to local circumstances. She worried aloud about the government adopting a one-size-fits-all approach to governance, when “what’s happening in Montreal, Granby or Gaspé is not the same thing.”  She said that many teachers were happy with the bill’s stated objective of decentralizing school governance, but are now disappointed. “Reduced bureaucracy, localized decision making, I don’t know who can be against that, but when you start reading the bill, we see that that’s not what’s happening.”

“The CAQ [government] had good intentions, but now we have more centralization,” said Carl Ouellet, president of the Association québécoise du personnel de direction des écoles (AQPDE). He said commissioners would visit schools and talk to students and parents. “The parents were a lot closer to the schools – parents knew there was a commissioner who represented them. They don’t have that anymore.”

He mentioned that one positive aspect of the reform was to give school leadership control over certain financial decisions. “Now [each service centre has] a resource-sharing committee with principals serving on it, who will decide how we will spend [government funding] provided to the schools. Most of the decisions are taken by this committee where we are represented rather than councils of commissioners, where we were not.”

Ouellet said francophone schools were “still adapting” to the Bill 40 and Bill 23 reforms.

“We have good directors general, but we are worried that we’ll lose a bit of power, because the directors general will be put in place by the minister, who will tell them they have to do this or that. That’ll be another adaptation we have to make.”

Francophone schools still adapting to CAQ reforms Read More »

Liberals’ future suddenly brighter

Courtesy Quebec Liberal Party
The three front-runners for Quebec Liberal leadership show a range of political styles.

Quebec’s most successful party gets ready for another run at the top

By David Winch

Local Journalism Initiative

What’s up with the Quebec Liberals?

The rise of Mark Carney and a tariff-driven federal election overshadowed the provincial Liberals’ leadership campaign. It officially kicked off in January and the five candidates for PLQ leader gamely pursued support, but with little or no media presence.

Now, they’re back – maybe all the way back.

Recent leadership debates (available on YouTube) showcased the five candidates for Liberal leader. They often defied preconceptions with strong statements of principle, notably as regards public finances and minority rights.

Cyclical rebounds

The Quebec Liberals were given up for dead after their 2018 and 2022 defeats, certainly by many Montreal pundits and instant-reaction “analysts”.

Unsurprisingly, the PQ’s poll numbers have soared in the political vacuum left by the CAQ’s unpopularity. My wager: that is a temporary bubble of homeless voters.

Particularly exasperating was the readiness of big-foot national correspondents, such as Ottawa commentator Andrew Coyne and Montreal columnist Konrad Yakabuski, to crown the Parti Québécois as 2026 winners. Each published columns under the headline “constitutional crisis”. These alarmist takes may look ridiculously premature after the next Quebec election.

The Liberals have repeatedly “risen from the dead”, then governed for years afterwards. I recall the red-splattered electoral maps in La Presse after Quebec elections in the early 1970s — Liberals everywhere. Then in 1976 they suffered a devastating defeat to the PQ.

The premier, Robert Bourassa, was even beaten in his own riding in central Montreal. The party drifted through a losing period, initially under dour leader Claude Ryan, before emerging victorious again in 1985, led by … Robert Bourassa.

In the mid-1990s a wave of post-Meech nationalism again forced the Bourassa Liberals out, and again the Liberal party looked hapless and hopeless for years.

Once reluctant Sherbrooke MP Jean Charest was drafted to lead the provincial Liberals, however, the PLQ won in 2003 and resumed its dominance — proceeding to win not one, not two, but three consecutive terms in office, a post-1960 record for them.

So it is unwise to underestimate a party with such broad-based history and appeal. Last year I wrote here (“Can the Quebec Liberals bounce back?”, September 2024) that, despite its perilously low poll numbers since its second big defeat in 2022, the PLQ had the most potential for growth among the four parties in the National Assembly.

Parties rotate in power

Recent history shows how quickly Quebec’s chameleon-like voters can “change colour” when the mood strikes them.

Back in 2012, the newly formed Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) proposed to bring a fresh tone to provincial politics. Its founder François Legault explicitly renounced future referendums. He promised to focus on the practical concerns of Quebec voters – health care, above all, but also tax burdens and government efficiency. It even feigned an opening to anglophone and ethnic voters.

It’s hard to recall now, but the CAQ was portrayed as an innovative vehicle for political problem-solvers. On that front, there has been disappointment all round.

The governing CAQ is facing severe headwinds, given the failure of its platform: healthcare is no better than when it took office, and nobody believes new body Santé Quebec will improve anything. The provincial deficit has ballooned to $13 billion, after being reduced to zero in 2018 by Liberal finance minister Carlos Leitao. Bottomless investments in electric battery maker Northvolt drained public finances.

And the general tone of society has become more tense, with cultural conflicts exacerbated by a Premier stuck on some 1950s-vintage cultural fears.

By contrast, the Quebec Liberals match some criteria of a “parti attrape-tout” or a catch-all party. This was defined by political scientist Otto Kirchheimer as a party that “appeals across the board, beyond social classes and especially the classic divisions between right and left”.  Such a party can appeal to many factions in society, as well as their opposites.

 At its best, the PLQ is a unifying party of broad reform, as with the Jean Lesage government of the early 1960s. It established a fully public education system, including Cégeps and a new university network, nationalized Hydro and promoted the francophone business class.

The Charest Liberal governments (2003-2012) tried to rein in spending and proposed “re-engineering” the state, an effort that ran into severe opposition when higher student fees were proposed to cover university deficits. But that government mostly presided over a decade of social peace.

Townships links

The five Liberal leadership candidates cover a broad range of styles. At the English-language debate held May 3 in Laval, several candidates stood out.

Pablo Rodriguez, a veteran Justin Trudeau-era federal minister with all the baggage that entails, comes across as firm and knowledgeable. This is matched by a reputation for being no-nonsense and even arrogant in private. His experience in the Township is extensive, as he was a Université de Sherbrooke grad and maintains links to the community. (He played soccer for the UdeS squad and broke his leg twice, which suggests his hard-charging style.)  By all accounts Rodriguez holds the lead.

Charles Milliard, by contrast, is smooth and confident sounding. He was head of a Chamber of Commerce group and is predictably critical of the CAQ’s spending misadventures. A new resident of North Hatley, Milliard could conceivably run in the Townships to upend the CAQ in a nearby riding.

Finally, Karl Blackburn, third of the most serious candidates, is solid in his small-l liberal convictions and business smarts. A former MNA for Roberval, he was also head of the executive group Conseil du Patronat. But his campaign was handicapped by his early absence, prompted by a serious illness. He is trying to regain ground, but for several months Milliard and Rodriguez were largely unopposed in recruiting delegates.

Any of these candidates could lead Liberals back, after they plumbed the electoral depths. Here’s hoping delegates choose the strongest candidate on June 14.

Liberals’ future suddenly brighter Read More »

Residents reject zoning change to allow housing development

By Nick Fonda

Local Journalism Initiative

Housing, in particular the dearth of affordable housing, was one of the major issues in the last federal election.  All candidates from all parties promised to provide more of it.  Yet, building residential housing is less straightforward than it might appear.  Land, even if it is available, is not necessarily entirely suitable.  Such is the case of a sizeable tract of land being considered for development in Richmond. 

The piece of land in question is located in the south-west corner of the town, and on its zoning map is designated as zones R-p8 and R-29.   In all it measures about 16 acres and stretches like a clumsily drawn rectangle, bounded on its long sides by the town limit on one side and Thomas Street—or the houses that line the south side of Thomas Street—on the other.  For the most part, the land slopes gently towards the south-east, much like the golf course, it’s neighbour across the street.  Approximately along the town limit, the land drops towards a small stream, and the most low-lying section of the tract is somewhat swampy. 

Even though it served as farmland as recently as three years ago, the land has been zoned white for almost a quarter century. 

At the time of the zoning, the Quebec government was moving to protect the province’s remaining agricultural land.  Municipalities were given an option of designating land in their territory as zoned white (available for development) even if it was farmland or forest.  Otherwise, the province would zone it green and immune from urbanization.  

The piece of land in question was part of a dairy farm that straddled the boundary line separating the Town of Richmond from Melbourne Township.  The farm was then being operated by Paul Fortier, who was also a municipal councillor.  His house and barns were located in Melbourne Township, on the other side of the invisible municipal boundary and on the other side of the small stream running approximately alongside it.   In earlier times, he used the land as pasture for his heifers.  That changed when the Quebec government began protecting the province’s waterways from, among other things, cattle wading into small streams.  To continue using the land as pasture he would have had to fence off the stream and build a bridge for his cattle to cross over it. He chose to pasture his heifers elsewhere and began using the land to grow corn or hay.

Paul Fortier’s farm is still in the family, but farming practices have changed and three years ago, the piece of land was put up for sale.  Being zoned white, it held great potential for developers.  It sold quite quickly and then was sold a second time. 

In the context of a nation-wide housing crisis, it is almost inevitable that this enviably-located, 16-acre lot will be developed.  What is of concern to the 19 households that live adjacent to it, on Thomas Street, is just what form that development is going to take.  If housing is going to be built, what kind of housing is it going to be?

On May 21, on their web site and in the local guaranteed circulation weekly, the Town of Richmond posted a notice announcing a request for a change in zoning regulations for R-p8 and R-29, the piece of land in question.

The change would allow for the construction of duplexes on the lower lying land and of multiplex buildings up to three storeys high on the upper slope.

Relatively few people take the time to read the public notices issued by the Town, but one concerned person did.  News of the request spread quickly and on Monday, the 26th, a petition was drafted expressing opposition to the zoning change.  It was signed by all the homeowners on the Richmond end of Thomas Street.  (The upper end of the street is in Melbourne Township.)  One of the homeowners contacted the town and learned that the proposed zoning change could represent as many as 170 housing units.  Richmond’s urbanist, Francesco Cappai, was open to meeting with the residents of Thomas Street to answer any questions. 

At 4:30 p.m. the next day, May 27, the town urbanist, councillor Katherine Dubois, and director general, Mario Mayette, were all present to answer questions from the two dozen residents—almost all of them from Thomas Street—who turned up at the Richmond town hall.

It was explained that the town had received no request for any building permits.  The request was for a zoning change.  The town had also been asked by the developer to subdivide the land.  Despite the brief presence of heavy equipment on the land in question, the town had issued no permits of any kind and the machinery was moved away quite quickly.

One of the residents pointed out that the notice published by the town was not easy for the lay person to read and understand. 

Another expressed disappointment that no one on the street had had as much as a phone call from their elected representative about this proposed change.

The residents were told that the request for the zoning change would be debated and voted on at the next council meeting.  The request might be rejected and the case closed.  However, if the council voted to accept the zoning change, the residents still had recourse to ask for a referendum to settle the issue.

It was a very polite meeting that filled the hour that had been allotted for it.  One of those in attendance, who had asked a number of questions, thanked the three town officials for their answers and their time. 

Many promised to be present at the next Richmond council meeting.

On Monday, June 2, the Richmond council chamber was filled to capacity.  The last half dozen of the 30 people in attendance had to stand.

The meeting was an anticlimax.  One of the first items on the agenda, the proposed zoning change, after the briefest of discussions, was voted down.  The land in question would not be given over to duplexes and three-storey multiplex buildings.  The zoning would remain as is, for single-family homes and apartment blocks of not more than two storeys.

If the rejection of the requested zoning change was a victory for the residents of Thomas Street, it holds limited promise of being permanent.  The prospect of 170 new households (representing a possible 340 more vehicles) on Thomas Street was vanquished on Monday night, but the land in question can, in theory, still be developed to accommodate 120 new households (and 240 more vehicles).

All three levels of government are anxious to see more home construction.  Builders, whose best profit margins come from upscale construction projects, are being offered financial incentives to build low-cost housing.  Similarly, there is a push to densification.  A single-family home on a half-acre lot is a luxury of the past.  Urban areas are moving towards housing more people in less space.

Richmond, like all other municipalities, operates on what it can generate from property taxes.  Bertrand Menard, Richmond’s mayor, pointed out that the town has two potential residential sites that together could create 300 new housing units.  (The land in question might yet represent 120 units and a second tract of land (its location undisclosed for the time being) would accommodate 80 units.)  Using $3000 as an average household tax bill, Richmond would collect close to an extra million dollars in taxes annually should both sites be developed.

Money collected through taxation is quickly spent on Infrastructure.  The water, sewage, and roadway on Thomas Street are scheduled to be re-done this year at a cost of two million dollars.  (The work is not related to any possible housing development; the underground piping and the asphalt road surface are both at the end of their expected life spans.)

Still, development of the land in question is going to pose problems.  At present, including the residents on Thomas Street, there are about 50 households that have to use either Belmont Street of Thomas Street to go anywhere.  Topography has made both streets, particularly the latter, rather steep and potentially dangerous in poor winter weather.  Because both streets were initiated more than 125 years ago (in the case of Belmont 200 years ago) when people still travelled by horse and buggy, both streets, and in particular Thomas, are very narrow, with houses perched close to the street.

As well as being steep and narrow, Thomas Street (named after Daniel Thomas, the area’s first notary) meets Melbourne Avenue (which also serves as Highway 243) at a potentially dangerous T-junction.

The residents on Thomas Street say they’re open to more housing, but what they picture is a limited number of single-family homes like the ones they inhabit.

Fully developing the land in question to 120 housing units would triple the traffic on two streets that were originally, to use the mayor’s words, small country roads.  Neither of the streets can be significantly widened, nor would Thomas Street have room for a sidewalk and bike path—amenities that today go hand-in-hand with a residential development.

On paper, Zones R-p8 and R-29 in Richmond seem ideal for a housing development.  Yet, the site lacks safe, drivable access capable of accommodating the daily traffic that would be generated by a multiplex development. 

The task faced by the Town of Richmond is far from enviable.  There is no simple, straightforward, easy, common-sense solution to making Paul Fortier’s field easily accessible, however promising it might be as housing development.   Rejecting the request for a zoning change reflects just how challenging it is to create new housing.

Residents reject zoning change to allow housing development Read More »

From Baldwin’s Mills to Baldwin Pond

Courtesy
Keith Baldwin

Oldest Wales Home resident can stilll catch a fish and cook it for you

By Nick Fonda

Local Journalism Initiative

When the United Church of Canada celebrates its 100th birthday this June, Keith Baldwin will be looking on with particular interest, and not just because, at 102, he is older than the Church.  His grandfather, and his namesake, Willis Keith Baldwin, played a significant role in the creation of the United Church of Canada a century ago.

“Forming the United Church—a union of three denominations:  Methodist, Congregationalist, and Presbyterian—required an act of parliament,” says Keith Baldwin.  “The Presbyterians were split on the issue with about 70 per cent of the congregations in favour of the amalgamation.  At the time, my grandfather was the Member of Parliament (MP) for the Stanstead riding.  He was a Liberal and part of Mackenzie King’s government.  He attended the Methodist Church in Baldwin’s Mills and wanted the United Church to be formed.  Mackenzie King, the Prime Minister, was a Presbyterian, and part of the 30 per cent of Presbyterians who were against the amalgamation.”

 “In Quebec,” continues Keith, “many of the MPs were Catholic.  They were completely indifferent on this issue.  As they didn’t care one way or the other, they would have been inclined to follow the lead of their prime minister.  However, my grandfather lobbied them and managed to convince many of them to vote in favour of the proposed amalgamation.  Without his efforts, it’s unlikely that parliament would have passed the legislation to create the United Church.”

Keith’s grandfather was an active and industrious individual whose story and untimely death were written about by Bernard Epps.  The great-grandson of Levi Baldwin, who moved to what became Baldwin’s Mills in 1798, Willis Keith Baldwin was a lumberman who owned and operated three different businesses in the town that bore his name.  He had a sawmill, a factory that manufactured boxes and crates, and the general store.  He was first elected to parliament in 1917, won four elections in all, and served as MP until 1930.    Five years later, at the age of 78, he was murdered in his general store. 

Keith was 10 at the time. 

“It was a very intense and difficult period for my parents,” he says.   “At almost the same time, my grandmother also died.  She frequently went to Florida for the winter months, a practice she had started when my grandfather was in Ottawa for the winter sessions of parliament.  That year, she fell sick and was diagnosed with cancer.  She died on the train on her way back home.  She and my grandfather died within two days of each other and neither one was aware of the death of the other.”

Keith, the second-born of seven children, grew up in a multi-generational household.

“My father, Harold, was my grandparent’s only surviving son,” says Keith.  “Their other son returned from the Great War, as World War I was then called, with what we now call Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and not long after the war, it led to his death.  We lived with my grandparents in a large, recently-built house which replaced a house that had been lost to fire not long before I was born.  Because I shared a first and second name—as well as a family name—with my grandfather, I was always called Keith, as my grandfather was always called Willis.”

“When I was growing up,” he continues, “there were two churches in Baldwin’s Mills, one Methodist and the other Baptist, but neither one had a resident minister.  After 1925, every summer the United Church would send a student minister and we had regular services for a couple of months.  During the winter, we listened to Sunday services on the radio.  As we were the only family in town with a radio, several neighbours would come over to listen with us.”

While Baldwin’s Mills is residential today, until the middle of the 19th century, it was a thriving, bustling, industrial community.

“At one time,” Keith says, “there was a factory that made buggies and sleighs.  As well, a steam boat called the Pinnacle Belle that ferried people back and forth across Lake Lyster was also built there.  There was a creamery that shipped cream and butter as well as a factory that made condensed milk.  There was a grist mill and there were blacksmith shops.”

Little more than half a century after Levi Baldwin founded the place, the St. Lawrence and Atlantic Railway opted to run its line through Coaticook, less than 20 km away.  Industries and businesses were slowly but surely lured to the nearby railway town and Baldwin’s Mills went into a long, slow decline.  Ironically, Coaticook was founded by Levi Baldwin’s son, Richard.

“Another Baldwin, Eugene, who was my grandfather’s brother, built a dairy barn in Coaticook that, for a time in the early 1900s, was the biggest in North America,” Keith notes.  “He then added to it and, for a time, was the biggest dairy barn in the world.  The barn is still standing and is part of the fairgrounds,”

As for Keith, when he finished high school, he signed up with the Royal Canadian Air Force.

“I trained as a bomber pilot,” he says.  “However, by the time I was shipped overseas, the war was in its last stages, and bombing runs over Germany had been stopped.  I did fly a loaded Lancaster bomber but it was to dump what had become surplus bombs into the North Sea.”

Back home after the war, he enrolled at McGill University where he earned a degree in metallurgical engineering.  If there was little need for metallurgical engineers in Baldwin’s Mills, that wasn’t the case in Sherbrooke.  Keith was hired by Ingersoll Rand to oversee the manufacturing of a wide range of industrial machinery.  He retired from the company after a 31-year career at the relatively young age of 60.

“My wife, Evelyn, had always been a stay-at-home mom,” Keith says.  “When I retired, with our four kids grown and on their own, Evelyn decided to try her hand at running a store.  She opened a small shop in Lennoxville, Comme Ci, and operated it very successfully for over a dozen years.”

“I went back to flying,” he continues. “I got a pilot’s license, and with two friends I bought a Grumman Tiger, which is a single-engine, four-seat aircraft.  I flew almost annually to Florida, where we have family.  On one occasion, I flew them to the Bahamas.  The longest trip I made was to British Columbia.  Without oxygen, I couldn’t go above 10 000 feet, and I flew through Crowsnest Pass to get through the Rockies.  I continued flying until I was 76 when I felt it was time to give it up.”

For 10 years after retirement, Keith made annual hunting trips to British Columbia for deer and elk.  Here in the Townships, he hunted as well, often going out to rivers to look for ducks.

“I’ve always liked the outdoors,” he says.  “In the winter, I’d take the whole family downhill skiing.  Often, we went to Owl’s Head, which was my favourite mountain, but we skied elsewhere in the Townships and in the New England States.  In the summer, I loved to go fishing.  The first time I came home with a fish, my mother sat down and showed me how to clean it.  After that first time, anything I caught, or shot, I cleaned myself.”

Keith Baldwin no longer hunts, but his fishing skills are still enviable.  Last summer, the Wales Home hosted a fishing derby in the small artificial pond on the property.  The biggest fish was reeled in by Keith.  In his honour, the pond was named Baldwin Pond.

While he is not one of them, there are still quite a number of Baldwins who call Baldwin’s Mills home.  Two of Keith’s children and their families live there, as does his brother, Lester Baldwin.  Mead Baldwin, who many know through the weekly column he co-writes for the Record, is Keith’s nephew.   

At 102, Keith is the oldest male resident of the Wales Home where he has his own apartment.  Still active, he does his own cooking, and is experimenting with growing lettuce on his north-facing window sill.  He regularly plays pool with Joe Kelly, and keeps up with current events.  He has an up-to-date driver’s license and, especially in the summer, takes his Jeep to Baldwin’s Mills to spend time with family.   

A lifelong member of the United Church, Keith Baldwin now attends services at Chalmers United in Richmond.   Erected in 1888, Chalmers United had been a Presbyterian church prior to 1925.  On Sunday, June1, he’ll be giving a talk on how the brick building on Main Street came to change denomination, and the role his grandfather played. 

From Baldwin’s Mills to Baldwin Pond Read More »

Canadians took the bait: hook, line and it will sink them

By Mary Ellen Kirby

Local Journalism Initiative

It is the morning after the night before and I have the mother of all hangovers. No, I haven’t been drinking. It’s just that I stayed up far too late, watching the federal election coverage. I hoped, prayed and voted for a different outcome, but alas – here we are with the results I dreaded but pretty much expected.

In the sober light of day, I see a number of ironies at play, not the least of which is the fact that in their fervour to “oppose” Donald Trump, Liberal voters just handed him exactly what he wanted, on a big red and white platter. Since his inauguration in January, Trump has on several occasions opined that he much preferred to deal with a Liberal government and complained that, “Stupidly, that conservative guy is no friend of mine…he’s not a MAGA guy…he doesn’t say nice things about me.” Translation: he was banking on more easily obtaining favourable trade concessions from the libs than the cons. ‘Annexing’ Canada would almost certainly guarantee a solid block of permanently Democratic voters, so I have a hard time believing a Republican president would ever float that as a serious proposal; I think we just got massively pranked by the mean boy next door.

For all the Liberal party braying about the evils of ‘American-style politics’ this is exactly what they have unleashed. Against all sense or logic, the central issue in this campaign was the Canadian approval rating of DJT, the leader of a foreign nation…as if it even mattered. It was a very cunning bait and switch con job executed with Machiavellian precision by the Liberals. If they had allowed voters’ attention to focus on their dismal decade-long record of runaway debt, waste and scandal, they undoubtedly would have joined the NDP on the sidelines. The NDP paid dearly last night for holding Canadians hostage to the dysfunctional Trudeau government: they have now lost official party status and shrunk to a measly seven seats. The Bloc Quebecois’ involuntary weight loss program cost them 10 of their 33 seats, so we now have a defacto two-party system in place…just like the Americans. We also have an increasingly polarized and divided electorate…just like the Americans. We saw an election campaign that fixated on leaders instead of examining party platforms. In other words, our election was based on the cult of personality…just like the Americans. Mark Carney chose to publicly announce his bid for the Liberal leadership on an American T.V. talk show, was endorsed more than once by Trump and hired a wealthy American actor to film a cringey hockey rink campaign ad. I think all the pseudo-patriotic railing against 51st statehood is a day late and an American dollar short: it looks and feels to me like we are already there.

And then there is the très grande irony of the Quebec vote. If I was the leader of either the CAQ or the PQ, I would be thinking long and hard before advocating again for separation. Apparently, when the chips are down, a majority of Quebecers prefer the safety of the flawed federal system. Even the undeniable fact that Mark Carney’s French language skills are sub-par, to put it politely, did not deter the loss of a third of the Bloc’s seats. So much for Quebec’s insistence that a bilingual prime minister is non-negotiable. So much for the pipe dream of Quebec independence, too. The illusion that Quebec was ready, willing and able to stand alone as its own nation died last night. It now appears to me that fifty years of separatist threats have been nothing more than an elaborate ruse to extort money and privilege from Ottawa. How can anyone take Bloc voters – and by extension, Quebec – seriously when, at the first sign of rough waters, they abandon ship?

While the Eastern separatist tiger has been exposed as toothless, the Western one is awake and roaring in the aftermath of last night’s disastrous election results. In less than 24 hours, Alberta is well on its way to collecting the large number of signatures required to trigger a referendum on secession from Canada. Theirs is no empty threat. If Alberta leaves confederation, Saskatchewan may not take long to follow them. In the early days of the election campaign, both premiers warned eastern voters that electing another Liberal government would trigger dire consequences for Canada. Is it possible that we may have just voted in our final Canadian election? The distressing paradox here is that by conjuring up a bogus crisis and then selling himself as the only one competent enough to manage it, Mark Carney may have just set in motion the real existential threat to our country. Like it or not, the western oil & gas industry is the economic engine of this country and without it, Canada shudders to a standstill. If that happens, we will no longer be strong…or free. The 2040 dystopian hellscape posited in the Policy Horizons Report commissioned by the prime minister’s Privy Council Office may read like the script for a bad movie, but western separation could bring it to our doorsteps sooner than later. In order to invest and prosper, to create jobs, to build anything of lasting value, businesses need stability. A country in constitutional crisis cannot provide that stability. A weak, divided, destabilized country ultimately becomes vulnerable to predatory takeover. As revealed by the exhaustive work of Canadian investigative journalist, Sam Cooper, the Chinese Communist Party and its malevolent operatives are already fully functional inside our borders, and the new PM favours even closer ties with China. I can’t imagine a scenario where the US blithely ignores China setting up shop along its Northern frontier. I am fiercely Canadian always, even if not terribly proud at the moment. But if it comes down to choosing between becoming the 51st American state or the 24th Chinese province, I’ll take my chances with the Yanks, thanks.

I have been looking at Abacus polling data, trying to decipher what happened last night. I am ashamed to say that, according to those polls, my generation is responsible for this train wreck. For voters over 60, the central issue in this election was Donald Trump. Why? They voted to…do what exactly? Teach him a lesson? Express their personal distaste for him? While he insists that heads of state kowtow to gain his favour and show “respect”, the POTUS doesn’t care, not even a little bit, how the Canadian electorate feels about him. We are nothing more than a single mosquito trying to penetrate the iron-thick hide of a rhinoceros. Did we seriously think that our ‘elbows up’ nonsense would dissuade him from playing tariff whack-a-mole whenever he got the urge? The undeniable irony is that our election results have simply reinforced his enormously over-inflated ego. He is already strutting and preening, congratulating himself for being able to influence the outcome of a foreign election. Look, I get that Trump is boorish and bombastic; that he walks in hobnailed boots all over anything or anyone in his way. He baits people, using jibes and insults to score points in a game where he calls the plays, writes the rules and gets to decide the winners and losers; it’s just bonkers. But what is even more bonkers is that we allowed him to goad us into playing his stupid game. That was evidenced by a short interview I saw last evening: a journalist asked a sweet, little silver-haired granny about her voting preference as she left her polling station in Toronto. ”Oh Liberal, of course!” she replied with a big smile. “And why is that?” inquired the journalist. “Well, to stop Trump”, she exclaimed. “He is such an awful person…he shouldn’t even be the president of the United States!” I was left shaking my head in utter disbelief. Maybe we need to require more than proof of Canadian identity at the voting booth; maybe we also need to require proof of a reasonable understanding of international boundaries and how our parliamentary system functions.

So, I am in mourning today. I don’t grieve because my “guy” or my “side’ lost, that would be childish, and I am too old for that. I grieve because we allowed the loudmouth narcissist next door to steal our desperately needed chance for a reset. I grieve for my grandchildren’s generation who are watching the opportunities and living standards that my generation took for granted move further and further beyond their reach. I grieve because I don’t believe that the crew who caused the problems are capable of fixing them. And as late as December of 2024, an overwhelming majority of Canadians agreed with that assessment. How did just a few short weeks and some off-hand insults cause such a massive attack of collective amnesia? I grieve because we have recklessly exchanged our grandchildren’s future for a cheap and hollow ‘victory’ against orange-man-bad. I grieve because we were persuaded to vote with our elbows instead of our heads.

Does anyone remember the old-fashioned childhood game of shadow puppets? You know, the one where a favourite uncle or your dad or grandpa turned out the lights; then using just their hands in different positions in front of a flashlight‘s beam, they projected big scary shadow creatures onto a white wall or sheet while the littlest kids squealed and cowered in delicious fear. Fun times! I feel as though this is where we are as a country. The lights were turned off in January. All our attention was directed to the big threatening monster projected onto the screens of our imaginations. I don’t know how long it will take for the lights to come back on. And I don’t know when it will begin to dawn on us that the monster we should be afraid of is not the shadow, but the hands. What I do know is, that by then it will be too late.

Canadians took the bait: hook, line and it will sink them Read More »

Ask the students

Courtesy

By Guy Rex Rodgers

Local Journalism Initiative

I was not born in Quebec so my education options were the neighbourhood public school or a more remote, and much more expensive, private school. My parents opted for the neighbourhood school.  It was a simple choice.  I was surprised when I arrived in Quebec to learn that children educated here prior to Bill 101 had to make a choice based on religion and then another choice based on language.

Over the past few years, as I have been making documentary films about Anglos and Allophones in Quebec, I have discovered strange aspects of the pre-Bill 101 school system.  The goals of Bill 101 were logical and defensible – it is important for immigrants to share the language of their host society. The system prior to Bill 101 was neither logical nor defensible. The French Catholic schools created a demographic time bomb by turning away multitudes of immigrant children because they were non-Christian (Jews and Muslims), non-Catholic (Greek Orthodox and Protestants) or, in the case of Catholics (Italians and Hispanophones), for reasons that no one has ever been able to explain. 

Jacques Parizeau never appreciated the dark irony of blaming the 1995 referendum decision on the ‘ethnic vote’ after Quebec’s majority culture had rejected so many ‘ethnics’ from its schools. When victims of this discrimination speak about it, their experience is dismissed as an isolated incident, or as an outright lie.

Nobody knows how many immigrant children were turned away from French Catholic Schools. Was it hundreds?  Thousands?  Tens-of-thousands? The best way to shed some light on this opaque subject is to ask the students. I have received funding from the Secretariat aux relations avec les Québécois d’expression anglaise to conduct a research project. The first step is a short on-line survey. It takes only a few minutes, and you can fill it out anonymously. I am happy to note that most of the people who have filled out the survey have also volunteered to participate in an interview.

If you received your elementary education in Quebec prior to Bill 101, please take a few minutes to share your story on the Quebec Schools Question survey at   http://tiny.cc/QSQ   

The responses are fascinatingly diverse.  Some immigrants, and even a few Anglos, insisted on getting into a French Catholic school and were accepted. Other students had parents who pioneered immersion schools and bilingual education. A small number of francophone students were agnostics or atheists who did not want to enroll in either Catholic system, and they did not want to be educated in English, so they enrolled in the small French Protestant system.

The largest school boards were French Catholic, and they were quite homogenous because they accepted few ‘outsiders’.  The second largest boards were English Protestant and they were highly diverse because they enrolled Jewish students, Greek Orthodox, Chinese and most of the Black students.  The English Catholic school board, initially created for the Irish, became much more diverse after the Second World War as Italians, Germans, Ukrainians and Hispanophones joined their ranks.  The French Protestant system was quite small until the 60s when French-speaking non-Catholics from the Maghreb and Haiti immigrated to Quebec. The range of educational choices was dizzyingly complex until Bill 101 obliged all immigrant children to attend French schools, which were still Catholic until the switch to linguistic schools boards.

The raw data from the short survey will provide a sense of proportion. What percentage of students were turned away from French Catholic schools compared to the percentage that freely chose one of the non-French-Catholic options? The short survey will also indicate if patterns varied over time. Was it easier to get into a French Catholic school before or after the Baby Boom? We will also be able to test the theory that rejection was more common in Montreal than in the regions. And were there difference between parishes?

The in-depth interviews will provide invaluable data about educational outcomes.  The Italian community is a model of adaptability. Whether Italian students were admitted into the French or English system, most of them – pragmatically and sensibly – learned both of Canada’s official languages. The efforts that non-Francophone families made to acquire French language skills is not appreciated and should be celebrated.  The first step is to collect stories from former students, so I’m asking you to take a few minutes to fill out the survey. http://tiny.cc/QSQ   

Ask the students Read More »

What happened to the world?

By Shawn MacWha

Local Journalism Initiative

Over the course of the past four months we have witnessed the most serious challenge to the international order since the start of the Second World War. The current American administration has unapologetically turned its back on the very economic and security institutions that it helped to create and in doing so has undermined global relationships and trading patterns that have taken generations to establish. So profound are these changes that on March 27, Prime Minister Mark Carney remarked that Canada’s old relationship with the United States, one based upon the integration of our economies and close security and military cooperation was over.

But this is not merely a bi-lateral problem between Canada and the United States. The most recent issue of Foreign Affairs (March/April 2025), one of the world’s leading political journals, focused almost entirely on examining threats to the prevailing liberal order. Across the world freedom is in decline and in 2024 there were more authoritarian states than democracies for the first time in over 20 years. While this may seem jarring to some people such a reversal is not without precedent and perhaps should not come as too much of a surprise. The long slow march towards liberal democracy and free market economics has been halting at times and there has been more than one period of sharp and painful regression. So integrated were the economic and political structures of Europe in the first decade of the 20th century, for example, that most people thought a war between the region’s major powers unthinkable. That system unravelled with remarkable speed during the summer of 1914 and twenty million people died. We forget such things at our peril.

Throughout most of the last century, from the end of the First World War in 1918 until the end of the Cold War in 1989, the world’s economic and political order was centred around the struggle between capitalism and communism with a brief interlude of fascism thrown in for good measure. This era essentially saw the world divided into ideological camps that were very often at odds with one another. The collapse of the Soviet Union saw this system come to an abrupt and somewhat unexpected end, leaving the United States as the sole superpower on the planet.

In the face of this new reality two major books came out in the 1990s that offered insights into what the new world order would look like. Francis Fukuyama’s 1992 The End of History and the Last Man argued that following a series of failed experiments with fascism and communism free-market liberal democracies had proven themselves to the be only viable means of organizing society. Secure in this knowledge Fukuyama proclaimed that history was over, at least as far as political models were concerned, as it had reached its natural pinnacle. Contrasting with this worldview, Harvard political scientist Samuel Huntington offered a more dismal future in his book The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order.According to Huntington the post-Soviet world would be characterized once again by competing power blocks largely organized along cultural lines that would struggle for regional and global dominance.

Roughly speaking these two books can be seen as popular expressions of two of the main theories underpinning the study of international relations. The first of these approaches, neoliberalism, envisions a world where international agreements, often but not always based upon economic integration, establish clearly understood rules and expectations. These calming forces increase cooperation and reduce the threat of conflict between nations. The second worldview is based on the theory of realism (or more precisely neorealism) and the belief that notwithstanding any unifying factors that may exist between states they will ultimately only follow rules if the outcomes meet their own narrowly defined self-interests. Such a world is much more liable to conflict when states choose to withdraw from international arrangements when they perceive them to be working against their interests.

On the surface, this appears to be what is now happening. The United State is turning its back on long-established mechanisms such as the United Nations, NATO, and the World Trade Organization as well as newer ones like the United States-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) free trade agreement. We are returning to the world of great power politics where a few blocks dominated by powerful states and their vassals (they’re not really allies anymore) seek to maximize their economic, political and economic status in a zero-sum game with their rivals. In such a world any gain by one must be seen as a loss by the other. And that is partially true, but there are other, darker forces at play in Washington that suggest that the current trend in American politics is not just a return to a Cold War outlook but is rather an outright challenge to the idea of liberal democracy.

In 2007 Chris Hedges, one of the most important but underappreciated thinkers in modern Western society, wrote an eerily prophetic book called American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America. Hedges saw an America where a generation of workers left behind by globalization had turned to evangelical Christianity to ease the pain of their economic loss. Opportunistic church leaders, and later politicians, picked up on their despair in order to further their own agendas, pulling much of American society towards a conservative and religious worldview not seen anywhere else in the Western world. It is this fundamentalism that gives licence to today’s attacks on such things as minority rights, reproductive freedoms, and immigration. To paraphrase American comedian Jon Stewart what these people are trying to do is force a “factory reset” of American society to the point where the baseline measure of value, competency, and authority is a white male at the centre of a nuclear family.

With the presumed authority of God behind them, right-wing politicians then tapped into nationalist sentiments and a nostalgia for a “simpler” America in order to establish the Make America Great Again narrative. This, coupled with a Huntington-esque perspective on international politics, has led to the fervour by which the current administration is seeking to dismantle the internal and external structures that have formed the basis of both the American and global order for the last 80 years.

Maybe. If we are lucky that is all it is. But it could be worse. Much worse.

Starting around 2007 a new anti-democratic movement known as “The Dark Enlightenment” began to quietly emerge in the United States. Led by American software engineer Curtis Yarvin and British philosopher Nick Land this worldview argued that democracy itself was a failed experiment that needed to be replaced. Proponents of this ideology, sometimes called neoreactionaries, favour a return to authoritarianism wherein political leaders seek to privatize the mechanisms of the state in order to run it like a corporation. There is even a term for this in their thinking – the “gov-corp.” Rather than having an elected political leader supporters of this approach envision the appointment of a national CEO chosen by a board of influential, but unelected, business and thought leaders. Unsurprisingly, most of these would-be King makers are white male elites.

This would be silly if it not so serious, but the idea of such a structure has taken root amongst several influential technology leaders in Silicon Valley and at the highest levels of the modern Republican party. The Vice-President himself has stated that he is sympathetic to Yarvin’s plans to “deconstruct the administrative state” and many argue that the President too is guided by this thinking. It certainly appears that the current administration is implementing some of the ideas behind “The Dark Enlightenment.” One of Yarvin’s key suggestions is the removal of an independent public service that could oppose the corporate vision of a leader through a process that he termed “Retire All Government Employees” or RAGE. Sound familiar?

It would be alarmist to say that America today is becoming like Nazi Germany, although what we are seeing does very much have a 1934 feel to it. In March of this year the head of the Sweden-based Varieties of Democracy Project, Staffan Lindberg, announced that by as early as next year the United States may no longer qualify as a democracy. Similarly, a recent article entitled “The Path to American Authoritarianism” by Harvard’s Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way of the University of Toronto warned that “democracy is in greater peril today than at any time in modern U.S. history.” Even if these are minority opinions the risk of ignoring them completely is significant.  

It may be that America will correct itself, and in doing so will return some predictability to the international order. Surely Fukuyama was right when he suggested that the world had often flirted with alternatives to liberal democracy only to return to it when the new models failed. But current events likewise show that he was wrong in assuming that history was over. It is just repeating itself. Hold on.

What happened to the world? Read More »

What a frightening thought

By Tim Belford

Local Journalism Initiative

Well the election is over and now the fun begins.

South of the border nothing is any different. Dithering Donald is still changing his mind and his policies at the drop of a tariff. As far as he’s concerned who’s now leading the potential ‘51st state’ is irrelevant. What matters is that the new man in charge comes to the realization that Canada becoming part of the United States is inevitable and a good thing.

We beg to differ; at least most of us. There are, however, some Canadians who would be perfectly happy to cast aside their citizenship and embrace lower taxes, a bigger army and the warmth of Donald’s smile. Just recently I heard an otherwise sensible acquaintance of mine ask, “Why not?” Well here’s why.

First off, it would play havoc with our educational system. All those children out there, and some adults too, would have to learn the names of fifty states and their capitals in a new geography class. Mastering ten provinces and three territories has proven difficult enough for most of us but this added burden would be a bit much.

We’d also no longer be a prosperous independent country. As a matter of fact we’d run second to California in both population and GDP as a mere state of the union.

Admittedly, we would probably pay less income tax than we do now but there’s a down side to that as well. Lower taxes would also mean no national health care system. It would be back to the days when childbirth or a major surgery could bankrupt you. Oh yes, there’s private insurance that you could buy with those extra tax dollars but try making more than one claim and see what happens. We’d also have to trade in our social insurance program for the much less satisfying U.S ‘social security’ system, one that The Donald says he would like to reduce. Child care? You’re on your own.

If we didn’t have the border to cross, yes, it would be easier to go to Disney World, Florida and Old Orchard. On the other hand, think of how many thousands of Customs and Immigration officers who would suddenly find themselves unemployed.  Trump would have to blame the fentanyl crisis on Greenland or perhaps Iceland.

In sports there would also be a major upheaval. Take football for instance. If the CFL disappeared, which it surely would, we’d be stuck with the NFL and its mamby, pamby four downs, tiny end zones, narrow fields and fair catches. Even worse, we’d lose the Grey Cup and its legendary parties and be stuck with the NFL Super Bore which is nothing more than a rock concert with a coin toss.

Being the 51st state would mean dropping the Maple Leaf Flag from our back packs when travelling abroad and getting used to nobody liking us anymore. It wouldn’t even help if you explained how your granny was from Edinburgh or Cornwall. We’d still be Yanks.

Being bilingual, particularly French-English, would be of no value whatsoever in a country that acknowledges only one official language. Under the kindly hand of Washington, Quebec would become Louisiana North and the building housing the Office de la Langue Française nothing more than an historic site.

But the best and overwhelming reason for not become American, however, is that we’d have Donald Trump as our leader. If that doesn’t kindle the fires of Canadian nationalism, nothing will.

What a frightening thought Read More »

Spring has sprung, sort of

If April weather is often trouble, what should we expect in May?

By David Winch

Local Journalism Initiative

We made it! Or did we?

Spring is surely the most anticipated season in four-season Canada. But as we enter May, can we expect our weather to finally behave?

In 2025, Townshippers have lived through a frigid January then a February white-out, followed by a cold March and a turbulent April.

Having learned nothing over the years, I decided to change to our summer tires on April 7.  The following day, we had a big snowfall. Driving cautiously through the snow front to Montreal, it dipped to minus-8 C. Later, I trudged along city sidewalks in the dark to a big hockey game, feeling like it was winter all over again. Brrrr.

We had more light snow in mid-April, followed by a slush storm to wake us up on the last Sunday of the month. Yup, for readers outside the Townships, we had winter weather much of the day on April 27th.

–Enough, already! The weather affects my mood and dictates our recreation and travel. Since I wrote about winter and summer seasons in Townships Weekend back in 2023 and 2024, now let’s try to figure out spring.

Photos courtesy Decidingvote.blog
Shakespeare cautioned that the “darling buds of May” face stiff winds. And in the Townships, frost too.

April fools us

The roller-coaster ride in April was not entirely unforeseen. Nobody here is ever sure about that month, and it often baffles commentators.

For years, one AM radio morning host in Montreal orchestrated an “April is winter” call-in rant to back his claim there were “six months of winter” in Quebec. Uh, not really. As a mid-April birthday kid, I recall many outdoor parties, garden events and baseball games then.

Newcomers to Canada, most recently a European acquaintance in Montreal, say Canadians “talk a lot about the weather”. But we have so much of it! Others quip that, while England has too much history, Canada has too much geography. You might add: lots of weather.

England has fine writing and most intense gardening culture, so it’s no surprise they have crystallized many apt sayings and aphorisms about the seasons. We just need to adapt these to Canada.

The end of winter unrolls slowly: “March — in like a lion, out like a lamb”. This is true enough in England but needs a tweak here. In southeastern Quebec, March regularly storms in like a lion, then slinks out like a tiger.

Then there is the hopeful “April showers bring May flowers”. Again, this is often true here, if you also count snow as a shower. The bloom may finally come only in June.

Anglophile poet T.S. Eliot’s lines from “The Wasteland” capture the ambiguity of spring thaw:

April is the cruelest month, breeding

Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing

Memory and desire, stirring

Dull roots with spring rain.

Yes, springtime can be a groaning, steady process. It does not happen all at once.

One old Townships country house we lived in featured a hand-scrawled pencil record inside a cupboard of “the dates the ice went out” on nearby Lake Massawippi. This record started in 1961, when ice was reportedly last visible on May 3-4. That was a late thaw; these dates more often clustered around April 20-22nd.

This year, the ice went out a bit earlier on Lake Massawippi, unofficially on April 14th. At least, no ice was visible from the North Hatley shore across to Baltimore Bay. Winter had ended, sort of, and we looked hopefully toward May.

Courtesy weather25.com
Weather for May

May takes its time

The month of May in the Townships can be lovely and mild, or dour and overcast. The “darling buds of May” that Shakespeare cherished can always fall victim to a morning frost.

Environment Canada and private weather apps forecast that, in the first half of May, daily highs in Sherbrooke will cluster between 14 C and 18 C, and the outlook will often be cloudy and rainy.

The weather25.com site helpfully advises foreign travelers that “temperatures in Canada in May are quite cold … between 9 C and 16 C; warm clothes are a must”.

“You can expect about three to eight days of rain in Canada during the month of May. It’s a good idea to bring along your umbrella so that you don’t get caught in poor weather.”

That’s the May norm for our region.

German meteorologist Wladmir Köppen classified climate regions across the world with a five-letter scale, denoted from A to E. The five groups are A (tropical), B (arid), C (temperate), D (continental) and E (polar).

Each group is also identified by extra letters to denote its seasonal precipitation and temperature.

Much of eastern Canada falls into group D; southern Quebec is classified as Köppen Dfb: “Warm-summer humid continental climate; coldest month averaging below 0 C (32 F) …. , all months with average temperatures below 22 C (71.6 F), and at least four months averaging above 10 C (50 F)”.

Sherbrooke, like Montreal — and Moscow — is a Köppen Dfb locale. It experiences “long, cold, and snowy winters, warm summers, and short but crisp springs and autumns”. Short but crisp, maybe that’s the spring descriptive we’re looking for.

So we’re not alone with our loudly four-season calendar. I have lived through grey winters with little drama or variety (including in northern Europe and highlands Mexico). Their seasonal spectacle is dull compared to Canada.

So gardeners, beware those comfortable English aphorisms when it comes to planting. To be safe, as one Townships grandmother cautioned, never plant “until after the first full moon in June”. Even May is not safely spring, it seems.

Despite all that, we love our springtime. English poet William Wordsworth, in his “Written In March”, sums up the season’s promise:

There’s joy in the mountains;

There’s life in the fountains;

Small clouds are sailing,

Blue sky is prevailing;

The rain is over and gone!

Spring has sprung, sort of Read More »

The unfinished business of free trade within Canada 

By Dian Cohen

Local Journalism Initiative

Canadians, including those living in Quebec, seem united in their desire for independence, sovereignty, and viability. There is so much we can do to advance this goal without constantly looking over our shoulders at the looming threat of American repression.

One improvement isn’t immediately apparent in the list of barriers to free trade within Canada: making our healthcare system more responsive. This means giving doctors more freedom to see patients while ensuring faster and easier access to healthcare professionals.

During the pandemic, all provinces expanded reimbursement for virtual care and removed administrative barriers. Before COVID-19, fewer than 3 percent of outpatient visits were virtual, but at the peak of the crisis, that number exceeded 70 percent. Feedback from patients was overwhelmingly positive: 79 percent wanted access to their personal health information, 77 percent desired electronic prescription renewals, 75 percent wanted the ability to book appointments online, and 86 percent felt more informed about their health as a result of accessing their health information electronically.

In 2021, Health Canada advocated for virtual care to become “a permanent, equitable, and fully integrated part of our healthcare system.” The Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) was working towards making Canada a world leader in artificial intelligence (AI) and ensuring the success of digitization. In June 2024, the government introduced Bill 72 to ensure that core digital health assets—such as patient records, diagnostic imaging, lab results, and prescribing systems—are interoperable and universally accessible nationwide. In December 2024, then-Health Minister Mark Miller urged Parliament to pass Bill 72, stating, “Just one example [of connected care] allowing AI scribes to be used in our system would create the equivalent of 1,000 new doctors in a very short period. Connected care can open up new avenues of care, and that is something this Parliament can do.”

Healthcare is under provincial jurisdiction. Passing Bill 72 at the national level would have facilitated provinces’ adoption of virtual care. However, Bill 72 did not progress through the parliamentary stages to become law before Parliament prorogued. Now that the COVID crisis has passed, many jurisdictions have reverted to pre-pandemic policies. The federal government has exacerbated this issue by failing to provide clear guidance on virtual care. The 2025 Canada Health Act (CHA) Interpretation Letter didn’t mention it, leaving it unclear whether virtual services fall within the insured basket of what the CHA regards as “medically necessary services.”

Addressing this gap is crucial because not having connected care is a barrier not just to interprovincial trade but also to our good health. Ensuring that healthcare is interoperable, accessible, and ready for AI-driven improvements is vital to better healthcare access. Canada already lags behind other countries in its adoption of new technology. Skepticism about its usefulness is equivalent to negligence.

A 2023 Canadian Federation of Independent Business report estimated that Canadian doctors spend 49 million hours a year on administrative tasks. AI scribe technology holds the promise of removing some of that burden. Studies suggest that it can save doctors multiple hours of paperwork each week, allowing them to dedicate more time to patient care. One study, commissioned by the Ontario Medical Association, found that family physicians, who report spending an average of 19 hours per week on paperwork, spent 70 to 90 percent less time on administrative tasks when using AI scribes.

The uptake of AI scribes in Canada has been low due to concerns about privacy and cost; fewer than 10 per cent of family doctors currently use the technology. Most physicians surveyed in the Ontario study indicated they were unwilling to pay the current price for AI scribes, which typically ranges from $135 to $400 per month for unlimited use. While this price may decline with wider adoption, a quarter of respondents stated they would only consider using the technology if it were free.

In March 2025, Canada Health Infoway announced it would cover the first-year licensing fee for the first 10,000 primary care providers who sign up to implement AI script technology into their practices. Even more enticing is that providers can choose from a list of pre-qualified AI script products vetted for privacy and other concerns by Canada Health Infoway and its provincial and territorial partners.

While we claim that our healthcare system is universal, many indications suggest otherwise. It imposes unequal costs on patients in time, travel, and lost income. A 15-minute doctor’s appointment can mean half a day of lost income for some. Patients in rural and remote communities don’t just wait longer for specialists—they also face flight costs, overnight stays, and logistical headaches just to see them. Check out this out-of-pocket cost calculator from a 2020 Infoway study: https://insights.infoway-inforoute.ca/calculator.

Many participants eager to reduce interprovincial barriers are on the job and pushing hard for results. Their efforts must not get lost in the disruption and upheaval caused by the election of a new government and Parliament.

Cohendian560@gmail.com

The unfinished business of free trade within Canada  Read More »

Prepare for takeoff

Montreal Metropolitan Airport
The renovated air terminal on the South Shore expects to handle 4 million passengers a year.

New air facility on South Shore set to become the “Townships airport”

By David Winch

Local Journalism Initiative

Everyone’s flying everywhere. The phenomenon is so widespread, we scarcely notice it anymore.

I am no frequent-flyer, unlike members of my broader family who jet away somewhere every month or even sometimes every week: to Vancouver, Florida, London, Bangladesh, Thailand, you name it.

But I do fly somewhere about twice a year, putting me in the Canadian median. “On average, most individuals take around one to three flights per year. This number includes both domestic and international flights”, concludes consumer site NCESC.com. Canadians mostly travel in winter to sunshine destinations in the Caribbean and, until recently, in the U.S.

Travel has changed

Over the years, the nature of air travel has greatly evolved. Security has been hugely enhanced since 9/11, sometimes making airports a gauntlet to battle through. Budget-cutting by airlines has ended the “luxury” of flying, except in business class. Classy service was the norm in the 1950s into the 1960s, with attentive stewardesses, as they were called, and enhanced menus.

Seats and leg room are now usually cramped in economy class. And as one Internet meme snidely portrays it, a pretzel with a plastic cup of ginger ale now constitutes an airline “meal”. The term Airbus aptly describes this uninspiring experience. –Get over it, buddy, reply the airlines.

Security restrictions are expanded in the aircraft, of course. When I first took a transatlantic flight, in 1975, I carried with me a business card signed by an Air Canada pilot I knew from Toronto. I handed that to the stew, and she quickly walked me up to the cockpit of the Boeing 747 so I could sit beside the pilots and chat with them. –Unimaginable today!

As for flight technology, even 50 years ago the two 747 pilots raised their hands in a shrug and admitted candidly that “the plane flies itself”.

Most mind-blowing today, certainly for me, is the growth and “normalization” of instant worldwide travel – flying anywhere right away. I recall a lecture in the 1980s by the then-moderator of the United Church, Dr. Robert McClure. He had served as a medical missionary in China from 1926 to 1948. McClure recalled having recently been in an airport in London where a giant poster boasted its flights to “Singapore in 16 hours”.

He mused that when he first started his work in the 1920s it was six weeks’ travel to China, then another six weeks to western China. With no stewardesses, ha.

Still, that does not mean that everyone today can just jump in a taxi and take off to wherever. Smaller, rural and regional locales often have no nearby airport with national links. As is the case with, yes … Sherbrooke.

In a Townships Weekend column comparing Sherbrooke to the very similar city of Burlington, Vermont (“Burlington-Sherbrooke: Twin cities?”, April 2023), I noted the ease of access to the American city’s airport and its many national airline connections. We do not have that in the Townships, and so we’ve been stuck with a two-hour drive to the Montreal-Trudeau airport in Dorval.

New facility in 2025

That all changes this year. The Montreal Saint-Hubert Airport, operational since 1927, is being transformed into a commercial aviation hub. It is being relaunched as the Montreal Metropolitan Airport (MET) and is expected to open its new terminal and begin commercial flights in late summer this year.

The renovated Saint-Hubert airport will give Montreal a second, smaller airport for regional and national flights. Many other cities have such secondary terminals, notably Toronto with its little Billy Bishop airport on the city’s waterfront.

MET is partnering with Porter Airlines to build a nine-gate passenger terminal, forecast to handle up to four million passengers per year (Dorval handles about 20 million). It will host domestic flights only, with no customs facilities for international flights.

Reader comments at the OMAAT site, which monitors airports and travel worldwide, have been generally favourable to MET:

“Saint-Hubert airport is much more convenient for a catchment area of about two million people stretching from the South Shore eastwards and northwards”, added one reader.

Another poster added: “There’s a train station right next to the airport that’s about 20 minutes away from Gare Centrale. If they can run a shuttle bus and increase train frequency (especially in off-peak times and directions), then I see no reason how this would be a worse option than YUL, even after the REM opens. Maybe even better.”

Indeed, this will mean – at least for domestic flights — no more requirement for Townships-based travelers to struggle through traffic in Brossard, Longueuil and over the Champlain bridge before navigating autoroute 20 west to Dorval.

Instead, after driving in on autoroute 10, at the junction with autoroute 30 at the edge of Brossard, you will just turn east and drive 13 minutes (Mapquest estimate) to the junction of highway 112 (Boulevard Cousineau). Then turn north on Cousineau another 13 mins to the airport entrance. Voilà!

Trips to downtown Toronto via boutique airline Porter are sure to be particularly popular. In the 1980s, I used to fly regularly on City Express airline from Dorval to the Island airport in Toronto. That greatly reduced stress and transit times by arriving near the city centre.

Sherbrooke is close to the South Shore of Montreal; indeed, there is a campus of the Université de Sherbrooke there, with a metro station of the same name. We are all part of the broader southeast region of Quebec.

Handled correctly, this new air link offers great opportunities for regional diversification. Business travelers and tourists will be eager to see this new gateway.

Are Townships political and business leaders prepared for takeoff?

Prepare for takeoff Read More »

Sugar Sammy – Laughing at Ourselves

Courtesy

By Guy Rex Rodgers

Local Journalism Initiative

Sugar Sammy is back with You’re Gonna Rire 2, his new bilingual show. I was curious. The friendly greeting Bonjour-Hi makes some people angry.  The CAQ government’s campaign to eliminate languages other than French makes other people angry. What happens when you bring a random crowd together and set a rapier-tongued provocateur loose among them? Would they all laugh? At the same jokes? Or take turns seething with indignation?

Sugar Sammy advises the audience early in the evening, ‘You’re gonna hate 10% of my show. But you’ll love 90%.’ He delivers on his promise – everybody laughs, and everybody gets laughed at. This is the genius of his humour, it is grounded in how we see ourselves, how we see our neighbours, and how they see us.

Most of the time we are barely conscious of the tribes we belong to and the places where we feel like insiders.

Sugar Sammy asked an audience member his name – Antonio.  Based on that single piece of information he guessed the man’s tribe – Italian, which led to a prediction of where the man grew up – Saint-Léonard –  a clichéd guess confirmed true, and Sammy guessed, correctly, how many languages Antonio speaks – three.  Then Sugar Sammy riffed on Italian values, Italian mothers and Italian food.  Italians in the audience found this hilarious, because these are stories shared within the tribe about families, traditions and values that shape personal identity.   

But why would these ‘insider’ jokes be funny, or even comprehensible, to non-Italians? This is where Sugar Sammy’s schtick rises to the level of art – and a profound understanding of human nature. We all look at life through multiple lenses. We are ‘insiders’ within our ethnic tribes, our social status, our gender, and our age demographic.  As insiders, we can question tribal expectations and even joke about traditions hammered into us by our elders. Within the tribe, we share experiences and a version of reality. We all live within multiple tribes.

All of us also have places where we feel like outsiders. Sugar Sammy has a clear affinity for underdogs, newcomers, the marginal and the powerless. Many of his sharpest jokes are directed at the overlords, the de souche, the privileged and the powerful. In Quebec, that group is largely populated by Francophones.  One of the oddities of Quebec is that the ruling majority sees itself as a threatened minority. There is some truth to this belief, and also a large dose of self-serving nonsense that is laughable.

In May 2023, Le Devoir headlined an article – « Sugar Sammy, l’incarnation du Québec Bashing » To criticise the majority automatically qualifies as Quebec bashing. To laugh and mock is worse. Sugar Sammy gleefully fires away. He has developed huge audiences in France, the USA and English Canada. Quebec is lucky he still makes time for a visit. 

One of the running gags in the show was about Quebec’s ‘fundamental value’ of male-female equality. Recent male immigrants, who hold tradition conservative values, see ‘modern’ women as loud, bossy and unattractive. This gag got a lot of laughs. Was the audience laughing at ‘progressive’ women or ‘regressive’ men? Or both?  All audience members will make their own judgement about which 90 % of the show is hilarious funny and which 10% is outrageously offensive. 

I was impressed by the diversity in the audience, which reflected the reality of Quebec. The largest tribe was Francophones, of different ages and origins. The second largest group was Allophones, some of whom were also members of visible minorities.  Sugar Sammy presumed, and the laughter confirmed his belief, that Allophones speak both French and English well, and they understand Canada’s ‘founding peoples’ better than they are understood.

The smallest audience group was Anglos. Another of the running gags was that Anglos have become bilingual but are not yet bicultural, so Sugar Sammy had to explain all the francophone cultural references. This is a cliché, but the audience confirmed it is based in reality. A lot of Sammy’s jokes are based on realities that we rarely discuss in public and never in ‘mixed company.’

Sugar Sammy is an unrepentant provocateur.  His show is offensive. And hilarious. And thought-provoking. I also found it profoundly optimistic. Thousands of Quebecers are flocking to see a bilingual show – horror! – that skewers some of our most sacred cows – double horror!   We laughed as insiders and outsiders, at a French-English show that would make little sense anywhere else. We came away understanding each other a little better, and remembering why we love this crazy place.   

Sugar Sammy – Laughing at Ourselves Read More »

Election?  What election?

By Nick Fonda

Local Journalism Initiative

On Tuesday, March 25, Matthew sent me an email which read, “…any interest in doing candidate profiles in a riding for the upcoming federal election? Maybe Richmond-Arthabaska?”

In fact, I was interested.  Over the years, I’ve had a chance to meet a number of politicians, or aspiring politicians.  With rare exceptions, they’ve been easy people to interview.  Many, by nature, are personable.  They’re usually well informed.  As well, they’ve generally taken the time to think their ideas through, and they’re able to articulate them clearly. 

I wrote back to Matthew and asked if he had the list of candidates in Richmond-Arthabaska.  He didn’t.  I went to plan B and systematically googled the web sites of the federal parties that made up the last parliament:  the Conservative Party of Canada, the Liberal Party of Canada, the New Democratic Party of Canada, the Green Party of Canada, and the Bloc Quebecois.  All I wanted was the name and contact information of the party’s candidate in Richmond-Arthabaska.  I took down the five phone numbers and I started dialing.

My first call was to the Conservative Party.  I was pleased to get through a short option list and to find myself talking to a woman with a pleasant voice.  Curiously, she wasn’t able to give me the information I wanted as she herself had not yet received it.  She was, however, able to give me an email address related to the candidate’s campaign.  My next four phone calls were far less productive as I was only able to leave my name, number, and reason for my call with the four answering machines.

I sent a short email to the address I’d been provided and on Wednesday, I got a phone call from the Conservative candidate’s campaign manager, Yanik Poisson.  We spoke briefly and he told me that, if I didn’t mind driving to Victoriaville, I could meet in person with the Conservative candidate, Eric Lefebvre, on Thursday.

As for the four messages I had left, only one managed to solicit a return call.  Late on Thursday, while I was transcribing my cacographic notes into a story, I got a call from the Bloc Quebecois and arranged an interview early the following week with their candidate, Daniel Lebel.

The other three parties, the Liberals, the NDP, and the Greens—and it’s now six days after I left a message—have yet to call back. 

Given that this election has been anticipated practically since the day after our last federal election in 2021, my expectation was that the five parties would be fully primed to launch their campaigns.

That’s not the case.  A week after Mark Carney’s election announcement, only two parties—the Conservatives and the Bloc—have put up election posters in Richmond-Arthabaska.

With the country going to the polls in less than four weeks, what are the other parties waiting for?  Or is it possible that this riding will only have two candidates? 

The possibility is not far-fetched.  For one thing, parties can run in as many or as few ridings as they wish.  Generally, except for the Bloc, federal parties, in an effort to show that they are truly national, normally like to make a presence in all 343 ridings.  However, with Canada’s first-past-the-post electoral system, only two parties—Conservatives and Liberals—have ever formed a government.  Worse, if political observers and pollsters are correct (and they often are), many ridings can be almost guaranteed to go to one of the three main parties (four in Quebec).  The Greens, when lucky, pick up a seat or two in an upset.

In the case of Richmond-Arthabaska, the Green Party has never picked up more than a few percentage points of the popular vote.  Does it make sense to invest the time and energy needed to find a suitable candidate and then find the money needed to mount an electoral campaign in a riding the Greens will never win?  Doesn’t it make more sense to put very limited resources into those ridings where the Party has a better chance of winning?

Similarly, the NDP in Quebec has only ever been a viable contender once, and that was 2011 when Jack Layton rode the Orange Wave through the province.   Richmond-Arthabaska has never elected an NDP member of parliament.  Given that Jagmeet Singh’s party faces the same challenge as the Greens, it too might well decide to ignore the riding and concentrate on more promising ones.

Nor has the Liberal Party ever been successful in Richmond-Arthabaska.  In 2015, the Liberal candidate was Marc Desmarais.  After the election, which he lost to the Conservative candidate, Alain Rayes, he said that if he’d had an extra week to campaign, he would have won.  His reasoning was based on the remarkable way that Justin Trudeau gained more and more momentum across the country as the election campaign progressed.  With a little more time, Desmarais said, Trudeau’s “sunny ways” would have reached and swayed Richmond-Arthabaska.

As it is, the riding, which was redrawn and renamed in 1997, was first served by André Bachand (Conservative), then, starting in 2004, André Bellavance (Bloc), and then, as of 2015, Alain Rayes (Conservative).  (Canada redraws its electoral districts every 10 years to reflect shifts and growth in population.)

While the Liberals have not so far named a candidate for the 2025 election, it’s not for lack of trying.  Ever since 2022 when Alain Rayes quit the Conservatives to sit as an Independent, he has been courted by the Liberals to run for them. 

Politicians do occasionally change parties.  Very environmentally conscious in his own life, Alain Rayes could easily have been mistaken for a member of the Green Party. When he ran for the Conservatives in 2015, he pointed out that no party platform can align perfectly in every way with a candidate’s personal values.  Conservatives, even as late as Brian Mulroney, were quite environmentally aware.  In the case of Alain Rayes, when he quit the Conservatives in 2022, it was because the new leader, Pierre Poilievre, had a total disregard for environmental concerns.

Had the Liberals been successful in wooing Rayes, the race in Richmond-Arthabaska would have been as unexpectedly competitive as the one between Carney and Poilievre.

While the Bloc has done well in the past in the riding, their candidate, Daniel Lebel, doesn’t have the name recognition of Alain Rayes nor of the Conservative candidate, Eric Lefebvre.  Interestingly, Rayes and Lefebvre ran against each other in a mayoral election in 2009, which Rayes won.  Their terms in public office, one federally and one provincially, closely overlap.  Both are popular with their constituents and both have won three consecutive elections. 

But Alain Rayes is not running and, even if more candidates step forward, the race in Richmond-Arthabaska is shaping up to be a two-horse race with the Conservatives looking to have an early lead.

What will voter turn-out look like?  Certainly, less than might otherwise have been hoped.  Until Stephen Harper’s Conservatives put an end to it, for a short while political parties received two dollars to be spent in the following election for every vote they garnered.  Small as the sum was, it motivated members of small parties (like the Green Party) to vote even if they knew their candidate would never win.

The turn-out will also be less than it would be if Justin Trudeau had carried through on his promise of electoral reform and introduced proportional representation.  Again, it is parties like the Greens and the NDP that would greatly benefit under such a system.   And so would we.  Our parliament would be a far better reflection of our political leanings if we had proportional representation.  Best of all, we would not wake up the morning after to find that a given party, even with less than 40 per cent of the popular vote, because of our antiquated first-past-the-post system, had won an undeserved majority in the House of Commons.

Election?  What election? Read More »

But why is China being given a free pass on tariffs?

By Mary Ellen Kirby

Local Journalism Initiative

As soon as our last two slowpoke ewes deliver, our lambing season will be over again for another year. There are dozens of bouncy wee lambs scrambling through the pens, playing tag and bleating their silly little heads off. Their mothers are stoic and unconcerned, calmly eating hay or chewing their cuds and pretty much ignoring their babies. There is no helicopter parenting going on here. The ram struts around, the undisputed king of all he surveys. I suppose he is allowed to be a bit smug: his offspring are vigorous and plentiful. As any farmer will tell you, things don’t always go according to plan when dealing with livestock. We had some difficult births in the wee small hours; there were a couple of weeks of mixing up bottles of milk replacer to supplement several sets of triplets; we managed to get an orphan lamb grafted onto a foster mother after we lost his own mother and twin brother to an impossibly difficult birth, and we managed to keep everyone fed and watered through a couple of snowstorms and power outages. While we are fond of our sheep, we are always glad to put the intensity of lambing season behind us.                      

   As always, the sleep deprivation and stress leave me feeling discombobulated and out of sorts, but this year it’s worse than usual. I feel a little bit like Rip Van Winkle these days. I haven’t been asleep for twenty years, as he was but I have been sort of sleepwalking through the last six weeks. Emerging from my lamb-induced stupor, I find myself in a country I barely recognize. Crass political opportunism is running rampant, otherwise sensible Canadians are earnestly buying the ‘Elbows Up’ hogwash and critical domestic issues are being buried or flat out ignored by the press whose job it is to hold governments to account on our behalf. Instead, it appears the media prefers the drama: they have been complicit in stoking the Trump fire, probably a desperate attempt to bolster waning viewership. So here we are, in the middle of a snap election called on the pretext of defending our country from the bogey man of American imperialism.    According to an Abacus poll taken last week, 54% of Canadians think the primary issue in our federal election is Donald Trump. I fail to see the logic in that. He is not our president. He is not our problem. However, Canada does indeed have an enemy; one that imposes crippling tariffs, undermines our democratic processes, infiltrates our Parliament and imprisons and executes our citizens. But that enemy is not the USA. Why on God’s green earth is China given a free pass in this election that purports to be about Canadian sovereignty? They have just levied punishing tariffs on Canadian ag exports as a retaliatory measure against our imposition of 100% tariffs on Chinese manufactured EVs. I thought mass adoption of electric vehicles was supposed to get us to net-zero nirvana. Why would the very eco-conscious, carbon-taxing Liberal government choose to limit Canadians’ access to more affordable electric vehicles? I am truly baffled. In any case, the resulting Chinese counter tariffs on canola, peas, pork and seafood leave our farmers and fishermen in troubled financial waters. Canola alone is worth $43.7 billion dollars to Canada’s economy and supports 206,000 Canadian jobs. While the threatened auto industry gets immediate pledges of $2 billion in support from Mark Carney, our farmers and fishers get silence. In fact, when worried NFLD fishermen tried to ask Mr. Carney about the Chinese tariff effects on their businesses at a recent campaign stop in St. John’s, they were denied entry and subsequently locked out of the venue. Disgraceful. It smacks of overt partisan pandering, in my opinion. Could this be because auto sector jobs are mostly in the Liberal party base of Ontario, while canola mainly affects the prairie provinces where the vote is decidedly blue? I dunno…I’m just asking for a friend.

   While I am perturbed by our government’s machinations, I am much more perplexed by the response of ordinary Canadians. If Trump’s 25% tariff threats send us into such a paroxysm of patriotism and boycotts of everything American, why do the 100% Chinese tariffs not engender four times the outrage? Are we so blinded by the ‘orange man bad’ rhetoric that we can’t or won’t recognize the bigger threat to our country? I suppose if we boycotted all the Chinese imports, our collective virtue signalling would be much more difficult: we wouldn’t be able to run to the nearest dollar store for those cheap, made-in-China Canadian flags that have suddenly sprouted up like mushrooms after heavy rain. We need to do better than knee-jerk reactions to dog-whistle politics if we are serious about defending our sovereignty. And so does anyone who aspires to the Prime Minister’s office. While there seems to be a variety of choices on the ballot, we have a de facto two-party system at the moment. So far in this election campaign, the only party leader I have heard address these looming agricultural issues is Yves-Francois Blanchet, and we all know the Bloc Quebecois will never form a national government. Neither the Greens nor the NDP have a snowball’s chance in hell of winning, so either the Liberals or the Conservatives will form the next government. As far as I can tell, neither party has made any attempt to formulate or promote policy around food and agriculture. Which leaves me in a quandary: where do I park my vote?

If anyone thinks that agriculture is irrelevant in this election, that the only “existential threat” to Canada comes from the big, bad orange man south of the border…well, I have a lovely little citrus plantation in Yellowknife that I can sell you.

   In theinterest of full disclosure, I want to declare that I identify as politically non-binary. I don’t vote according to party lines; I pay attention to platforms, track records, promises kept – and broken – and then I mark my ballot according to what seems to make the most sense to me at that time. Shortly after my 18th birthday I cast my first vote and I have voted in every municipal, provincial and federal election since then. I have voted across the political spectrum over the last four decades with no allegiance to any party or leader. I have even voted Rhino once or twice when I was thoroughly disgusted by all the other options. There are about three weeks left in this campaign, and I am going to be watching for some substantive agricultural policy from both the red team and the blue team. I hope they ante up. Otherwise, I will be tempted to draw heavy black pencil lines through all the choices on offer in my riding and write in my preferred candidate: Pinocchio. At the very least, it would be obvious when the puppet Prime Minister was lying; it would be as plain as the nose on his face.

But why is China being given a free pass on tariffs? Read More »

A history of uncertainty

Courtesy Wikicommons
Quebec after the 1775 American attack

By Shawn MacWha

Local Journalism Initiative

For more than 150 years, Canada and the United States have stood side by side as sibling countries, born of the same mother. Generations of people have crossed back and forth across the border in search of families, friends, economic prosperity, freedom from prosecution, or maybe just a summer holiday. Our armies have fought and died together to defend our ideals, and our soil, including the time in 1943 when 5,700 Canadian soldiers helped to retake the Alaskan island of Kiska from Japanese invaders – the only time that American territory was occupied during the Second World War. More recently our economies have become almost inextricably intertwined, with goods moving throughout the North American marketplace generating wealth for hundreds of millions of people. 

The recent announcements by the current U.S. administration represent a stark deviation from this pattern of cooperation that has awoken both patriotism and concern amongst Canadians. But the dark words coming out of Washington this winter are by no means the first time that our American neighbours have stricken out at Canada. Indeed during the early years of our history there were several times when relations were so sour that the United States threatened, and even used, military force against our country.

Such aggression was seen at the very beginning of the American nation when, in September 1775, one of the first acts of the Revolutionary Army was to invade Britain’s Canadian possessions. That autumn American Generals Richard Montgomery and Benedict Arnold led a two-pronged attack upon Montréal and Québec City which came north through the Richelieu and Chaudière valleys, bracketing the territory that would later become the Eastern Townships. The strategy behind this attack was to undermine London’s ability to counter the revolution by diverting British forces away from their American colonies and to inflame French-Canadian opposition to the Crown. Unfortunately for the Americans they encountered stiff resistance at Fort Saint Jean (Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu) and while the British garrison there eventually surrendered after 45 days of fighting Montgomery’s drive north was delayed well into autumn. Bypassing Montréal the Americans resumed their push into Canada and in December, 1775 their two columns met just south of Québec City. Exhausted, frost-bitten, and outnumbered, the Americans attempted to take the city on December 31st and were soundly defeated, leading them to abandon their aspirations in Canada and retreat south across the border.

Courtesy Wikicommons
Blockhouse in Lacolle, Quebec

Less than 40 years later, during the War of 1812, there were several more American attacks across the border, including into Québec. In November, 1812 American forces under Major-General Henry Dearborn, who was himself a veteran of the failed 1775 incursion, once again sought to take Montréal via the Richelieu valley. Setting off with a force of more than 5,000 men from Champlain, New York Dearborn only made it a few kilometres into Canada before his force ran into trouble. Facing a defensive line along the north shore of the Lacolle River the Americans attempted to encircle the British, Canadian and Mohawk forces. Alas in the confusion of the battle the Americans lost track of the defenders, and each other, and ended upon firing upon their own forces, breaking their momentum, and their will for further battle.

Later American movements into Canadian territory included a November, 1838 raid across the St. Lawrence River when a group known as the Hunter Patriots landed near Prescott, Ontario in the hopes of founding a Canadian republic. Approximately 250 men crossed over from the town of Ogdensburg, New York and in the ensuring Battle of the Windmill were thoroughly defeated by defending British regulars and Canadian militia. Three decades further on Canada once again faced armed attacks from the United States when members of the Fenian Brotherhood, a group of Irish nationalists, conducted a series of raids into Canada between 1866 and 1871. The idea behind these attacks was to seize Canada and then exchange it back to the United Kingdom for Irish independence. Here in the Eastern Townships a force of more than 1,000 Fenians crossed into Québec in June, 1866 and briefly occupied the area around Frelighsburg. They were met with swift and strong Canadian resistance and soon surrendered although another unsuccessful attack was launched against the same area in 1870.

Courtesy
Eccles Hill, 1870, Red Sashes with Fenian Cannon

While American regulars have not attacked Canada since Confederation it was largely due to the spectre of a hostile Union Army that we came together as a country in the first place – a country that was forced to dispatch soldiers to reinforce Canadian claims to the Yukon in 1898 and a country that the American military maintained battle plans against until as late as 1939. Most of these American threats and actions against Canada suffered from the same problem in that they greatly underestimated the willingness of Canadians to defend their land. Many of the commanders who led these attacks, and the American journalists who cheered them on, were under the false impression that deep down inside Canadians secretly wanted to be Americans. They were wrong then, and they are wrong now.

For all of our lives we have lived with the notion of Canada and the United States sharing the longest undefended border in the world. While the 9/11 terrorist attacks altered that openness somewhat the most recent efforts of the U.S. government represent the greatest change in our bilateral relations in more than 100 years. Yet despite that challenge we will get through this kerfuffle (to use a Canadian word) just as we have gotten through every other American threat to our homes, or as our anthem so poetically puts it, nos foyers. But to do that we need to be crystal clear about who we are as a people. We are a people who love diversity, equity, inclusion, acceptance, bilingualism, the idea that your level of health care should not be determined by your level of wealth and the knowledge that basic manners dictate that you should not yell at a person who you’ve invited into your house. Even if it is a white house.

A history of uncertainty Read More »

Maple syrup industry faces shifting landscape amid tariffs and production challenges

Courtesy: Producteurs et productrices acéricoles du Québec
A worker taps a tree as the sugaring season gets underway

By William Crook

Local Journalism Initiative

The Quebec maple syrup industry is navigating a shifting landscape in 2025, balancing record production with market challenges, including new tariffs imposed by the United States. David Hall, Montérégie-Est President of the Productions et productrices acéricoles du Québec (PPAQ), spoke about the state of the industry, recent technological advancements, and the potential impact of the tariffs in a recent interview.

Record production despite weather concerns

Despite initial fears that last year’s warm winter would negatively affect maple syrup yields, 2024 turned out to be a record-setting season for many producers. “Everybody thought it was going to be a bad year,” Hall said, “but it turned out to be a record year for most people.”

Hall explained that optimal weather conditions are key to sap flow, and despite the lack of snow, the season aligned well with tree activity. “It’s the weather you get when the trees want to run,” he said, noting that the ease of access due to lower snowfall also helped many producers be ready ahead of time.

While it’s too early to predict the outcome for 2025, Hall remains cautiously optimistic, stating that “long-term weather forecasts don’t look bad.” He mentioned that some producers had already begun collecting sap due to unseasonably warm conditions in late February.

Market stability and challenges

The Quebec maple syrup industry remains a global powerhouse, with significant portions of production being exported. Eastern Townships syrup producers typically sell their output to packers, who then distribute it to domestic and international markets. Large companies like Citadelle in Plessisville and a major packer in Granby handle millions of pounds of syrup each year.

While the U.S. produces significant amounts of maple syrup—particularly in Vermont—American buyers continue to rely heavily on Quebec’s supply. “The U.S. is not self-sufficient in maple syrup production,” Hall explained, adding that many American producers are seeking alternative sales strategies due to dissatisfaction with packer pricing.

The industry also faces broader financial pressures, including rising costs for labour, equipment, and materials. “COVID drove prices up,” Hall said. “Labour was hard to come by, stainless steel was expensive, oil went up, plastic went up.” These factors have increased the cost of syrup production, forcing producers to adapt.

Courtesy: Producteurs et productrices acéricoles du Québec
People gather to savour a maple treat in the fresh air

Impact of tariffs

A major concern for 2025 is the recent imposition of tariffs on Canadian maple syrup entering the U.S. Hall acknowledged that it’s still too early to determine the full impact on Quebec producers but anticipates that American packers will likely pass the cost on to consumers. “What’s going to happen is the U.S. packers are just going to up their price,” he said. While some companies might absorb part of the tariff, Hall believes that in the long run, prices will adjust accordingly.

Some industry observers have suggested that Quebec producers could collaborate to push back against the tariffs, but Hall is skeptical. “Each packer is different,” he said. “It’s not like hair combs—maple syrup is a sweat equity game.” He explained that profit margins are tight, making it difficult for producers to absorb additional costs without passing them down the supply chain.

The push for sustainable expansion

One of the biggest ongoing battles in the industry is securing more land for syrup production. Hall pointed out that the Eastern Townships has one of the highest percentages of land already in syrup production, limiting expansion opportunities. “Maple syrup is better for the economy, better for the environment,” he said, emphasizing that it generates more government revenue than traditional forestry.

However, accessing Crown land remains a challenge, as the forestry industry competes for the same territory. “The forestry lobbies are strong,” Hall noted, adding that PPAQ’s long-term goal is to secure more land for syrup production.

For those who do lease Crown land, producers must invest heavily in infrastructure. “You’re responsible for roads if there aren’t any,” Hall explained. “You have to bring in hydro or use a generator.” Despite the upfront costs, he believes the benefits outweigh the challenges, particularly as demand for maple syrup continues to grow.

Technological advancements

In recent years, technological improvements have helped producers reduce costs and increase efficiency. One of the most significant advancements has been electric evaporators, which dramatically lower production costs compared to traditional oil-fired systems. “Your production cost is 10 per cent of what it would be with oil,” Hall said. However, the initial investment is steep—around $250,000 per unit.

Reverse osmosis (RO) technology has also continued to evolve, allowing producers to extract water more efficiently from sap before boiling. “The technology keeps improving,” Hall said, adding that new systems can now remove up to 90 per cent of the water before the evaporation process, reducing energy consumption.

Looking ahead

As the industry moves forward, Hall expects continued adaptation to economic pressures and environmental factors. He noted that the PPAQ monitors inventory levels and exports closely, ensuring that production aligns with demand. “It’s fairly transparent,” he said, referring to the reporting system that tracks export figures.

Despite uncertainties surrounding tariffs and land access, the industry remains resilient. Hall pointed out that many smaller producers continue sugaring for the tradition and enjoyment of it, while larger operations invest in new technology to maintain efficiency. “Some people play hockey; some people make syrup,” he said with a chuckle.

With the sugaring season now underway, Quebec’s maple syrup producers will be keeping a close eye on weather conditions and market trends, hoping for another strong year despite the evolving challenges.

Maple syrup industry faces shifting landscape amid tariffs and production challenges Read More »

Bill 84 – Concerns grow over Quebec’s national integration bill

Courtesy Pexels – Valentina Rodriguez

By William Crooks

Local Journalism Initiative

A controversial new piece of legislation in Quebec is raising alarm bells among English-speaking communities and minority groups. Bill 84, also known as the National Integration Act, has been described by its critics as vague, far-reaching, and potentially harmful to the rights of English speakers and other cultural minorities. While the government insists the bill is about fostering a shared Quebec identity, many see it as an attempt to impose a rigid, undefined cultural model while laying the groundwork for a Quebec constitution.

Introduced by Minister of the French Language Jean-François Roberge, the bill seeks to establish a “national integration model” with the French language as its main pillar. It defines Quebec culture as “the common culture and vector for social cohesion” and states that “all persons living in Quebec” must adhere to it. The bill also grants the government the authority to make funding decisions based on compliance with this integration model, a point that has particularly unsettled community organizations.

QCGN: “We are being written out of history”

The Quebec Community Groups Network (QCGN) has been one of the most vocal critics of Bill 84. In a recent presentation to the National Assembly’s Commission des relations avec les citoyens, QCGN Director-General Sylvia Martin-Laforge argued that the bill makes “almost no reference” to English-speaking Quebecers, despite their significant contributions to the province.

“This is a broad, powerful bill,” she stated. “It could well reach into every part of Quebec society and involve all levels of government, professional bodies, community organizations and their events, employers and employees, newly arrived Quebecers and even those who have lived here for generations.”

One of the QCGN’s biggest concerns is the bill’s ambiguity. “They keep talking about a Quebec model, but they don’t define it,” Martin-Laforge explained. “And in what can only be interpreted as deliberate, but symbolically powerful omissions, this bill contains no more than a fleeting, oblique reference to us.”

She also warned of financial consequences for community organizations. “They are suggesting restricting government funding to an integration model that is not defined. So what does that mean? Will cultural events need to dedicate a percentage of programming to ‘Quebec culture’ to qualify for funding? Will festivals like the Scottish Games or the Irish Parade be at risk?”

English school boards take a measured approach

While the QCGN has taken a firm stance against Bill 84, others in the English-speaking community are still assessing its implications. Michael Murray, chair of the Eastern Townships School Board (ETSB), said that while his organization is reviewing the bill, it does not currently anticipate any major disruptions.

“Obviously, we’ve looked at it, and we intend to go ahead with a process of analysis to see exactly what we need to do to change,” Murray said. “We may even be looking at some of our policies to update them in context of the requirements of the bill.”

However, he stopped short of condemning the legislation. “It’s more going to impact how we work rather than fundamentally undermine our basic operations,” he explained. “But we want to consult our employees and stakeholders before making any decisions.”

Townshippers’ Association: “We need clarity”

Denis Kotsoros, Executive Director of the Townshippers’ Association, also acknowledged concerns about the bill but urged a cautious, dialogue-driven approach. “Bill 84 is trying to enact cultural integration rather than the multicultural integration program that Canada has had for the past 150 years,” he said. “This is part of a long-standing clash between Quebec and Canada.”

While Kotsoros recognized that the government is listening to concerns, he stressed the need for clearer definitions. “They talk about reciprocity, but how do you define that? How do you define cultural integration? I’m not sure anybody has the right answer right now, including the government,” he stated. “Even Minister Roberge has acknowledged they might need to make adjustments.”

At the same time, Kotsoros emphasized the need for English-speaking communities to remain engaged. “We have to be vigilant. It’s not just about waiting to see what happens. We have to keep the discussion going, or we risk being left out.”

A step toward a Quebec constitution?

One of the broader concerns surrounding Bill 84 is that it appears to be part of a larger push toward a Quebec constitution. Martin-Laforge pointed to this as a central issue, noting that Bill 84 follows in the footsteps of Bills 21 and 96, both of which imposed significant changes to the rights of non-Francophones.

“Bill 21 (on state secularism), Bill 96 (on language), and now Bill 84 all weaken the protection of fundamental rights,” she said. “This one, like the others, overrides the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms and lays the groundwork for a Quebec constitution.”

Kotsoros echoed this sentiment. “The big issue here is the clash between cultural integration and multiculturalism. That’s what needs to be reconciled. But I don’t see anything in this bill that actually does that.”

What’s next?

With consultations ongoing, it remains to be seen whether the Quebec government will make changes to Bill 84 before it is passed into law. For now, English-speaking groups, school boards, and cultural organizations are watching closely.

Martin-Laforge summed up the stakes: “This bill has the potential to erase our contributions, our history, and our role in Quebec society. If we can’t celebrate who we are, if we can’t look forward to contributing to Quebec’s future, then what place do we have?”

As debate continues, one thing is clear: Bill 84 has ignited a deep conversation about identity, culture, and the future of Quebec society.

Bill 84 – Concerns grow over Quebec’s national integration bill Read More »

The art of nurturing money

By Dian Cohen

Local Journalism Initiative

I’ve been passionate about estate planning and financial wellness for over fifty years, and I want to share some thoughts that might be helpful for those who are retired or getting ready to retire.

It’s tax time. Whether you do your tax return or have someone do it for you, it’s important to know how your retirement income is taxed and what tax perks are available to seniors. Not knowing this can make it tough to figure out how much money you have for living expenses.

Table 1 shows the major ‘pots’ from which retirement income comes and how they are taxed:

Table 1

Table 2 shows the major federal tax perks — make sure to check if there are any provincial-level tax credits or tax deductions for seniors. For example, for Quebecers aged 70 and over, there’s a Senior Assistance Tax Credit which offers up to a maximum of $4,000 for eligible couples and $2,000 for individuals.

Table 2

Just because you need to withdraw money from a tax shelter does not mean you have to spend it. If you don’t need the funds for your living expenses, consider investing them in a taxable, non-registered account. If you’re one of the lucky ones who can do this, this is good. Consider this: if you retire at 65 and live until 95, you’ll need 30 years of annual income, which could nearly match the income you earned during your working career. People are living longer, and the odds are good that at least one spouse, if not both, will live into his or her 90s.

It’s a good time to think about protecting yourself against “longevity risk” – the risk of outliving your money. Aside from investing in the stock market, an advanced life deferred annuity (ALDA) can help address this problem. This annuity can be purchased from a life insurance company and the income payments can be deferred to any age up to 85. Because the guaranteed payments are deferred, this type of annuity is cheaper than other annuities.

Another area of concern has been brought to my attention. It has to do with the internet. Older people can be more susceptible to scams. Maybe it’s because we grew up before the internet and tend to be more trusting, or perhaps we aren’t as aware of the latest digital scams. Whatever the reason, it’s important to know what to watch out for.

If you get a phone call, email, or text from someone claiming to be with the income tax department—whether it’s the CRA or Revenu Quebec—just hang up or delete the message without clicking anything. Legitimate agencies know how to reach out to you properly – and this is not it!

Never, ever, click on or open an email from someone you don’t know, and never, ever, download anything from a website you’ve been directed to. Never click on a pop-up window or open an attachment sent by someone you don’t know. One wrong click could expose all your computer files to a scammer.

Just recently, a news story highlighted a man who Googled “best GIC rates” and then received an email from what appeared to be a legitimate financial institution offering him a 6 percent return. Despite never having worked with them before and knowing that the typical rate was 3 to 3.5 percent, he transferred $750,000 from his trusted bank to what turned out to be a scam. Tragically, he lost all that money. If you are doing financial stuff online, consider doing it with a friend or family member. It’s always better to be safe than sorry.

Cohendian560@gmail.com

The art of nurturing money Read More »

We The People

Courtesy

By Guy Rex Rodgers

Local Journalism Initiative

‘We the people’ is an empowering concept, unless your people are out of power, or they are part of a minority overpowered by a rival clan.   

Democracy was built on the idea that ‘we the people’ can stand together to defend ourselves from tyrants and adversity. United, we can weather tempests and, after the storm, share the burden of reconstruction.

Unity has always been an elusive aspiration because human nature is fundamentally selfish. ‘Me first’ is basic survival instinct. In dog-eat-dog competition, the shrewdest and most ruthless live the longest. But that is not a life most people will choose if other options are available.

Given a choice, most of us will cooperate for mutual benefit, which begins with the family, extends to the clan and can ultimately encompass total strangers, although that is an unnatural relationship. Why should anyone share anything with strangers?  What is the motivation to assist needy people in a different part of the city?  Or in a different part of the country?  Or in a foreign country on the other side of the world?

One motivation to help strangers is empathy. The sight of suffering stirs our emotions. Another motivation to help our neighbour in times of trouble is the expectation that they will reciprocate when we need help. A world without empathy, reciprocity and cooperation is a sad and lonely place.

The current US president has embarked upon a campaign of America First. It is shocking to see the USA exert its considerable might in the pursuit of self-interest, ignoring friendships, alliances and principles. It seems illogical. Entire industries will be damaged, billions of dollars will be lost and multitudes will suffer, on both sides of the border.     

What is the motivation? What is to be gained?   

These are the wrong questions. There is no mystery in the selfishness of human nature or in the temptation for the powerful to exploit the weak. The real mystery is why concepts like empathy, reciprocity and cooperation inspire the human imagination, at least between periods of ‘me first.’

There is something otherworldly, almost miraculous, about strangers cooperating. This miracle requires trust and leadership.  In Canada, we have been blessed for many years to live under these conditions. Our leaders have not been perfect, nor has our democracy. But, to paraphrase Winston Churchill, we had the best option available.

Now it is threatened. The most pressing danger gathers outside our borders. The current US president could create such chaos and hardship that an offer of peace, in the form annexation, might appeal to a majority of Canadians. Those who prefer the old Canada would be lost within a double minority, as naysayers within a 51st state, and as unwanted aliens within the encroaching Empire.

We live in Quebec. I’m writing this column in English. Here we have our own issues of tribal dominance, which are also on the rise. The CAQ government has been busily re-defining which Quebecers have full citizenship rights.  This government is not using economic warfare. There are no soldiers in the streets.  The battle is cold-bloodedly bureaucratic.  

The CAQ government has passed a series of interlocking laws to define Quebec’s values and identity: Bill 21 (Secularism) in 2019, Bill 40 (Education) in 2020, Bill 96 (Language) in 2022, and the latest tabled this year, Bill 84 (National Integration).  These laws override minority rights that should be guaranteed by Quebec’s Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms. ‘We the people’ no longer means that all Quebecers share the same rights and freedoms. The new definition of ‘we the people’ prioritizes collective values that the CAQ believe are shared by ‘true Quebecers.’  People with different values (languages or religions) can submit to the will of the majority or pack their bags. These are grim choices.

We have no reason to expect special consideration from a foreign government. In fact, we should prepare for the worst from the current US administration, and not expect a return to  ‘normal’ even after the next election.  We do have a right to expect more of our own government, and we have a right to be angry about the divisive identity politics they have exploited. It will be poetic justice for Legault and the CAQ to be soundly defeated in the upcoming provincial election.  Will the next government have the wisdom to restore a definition of ‘we the people’ that includes all of us?  Maybe an external threat is what we need to bring us back together.

We The People Read More »

Age: it’s more than a number

Seniors are changing our society, economy. How can they really thrive?

By David Winch

Local Journalism Initiative

If you were gifted a “second lifetime”, what would you do with it?

The question isn’t often asked that way, but it should be. Seniors today have mostly received a gift of life-extension. While people living in their 60s, and even their 50s, used to be viewed as old and in decline, now their 70s are increasingly spent in fruitful activities and often in part-time or even full-time work.

The notion that reaching 70 is the Exit door for professional and social life has steadily been losing ground. Work years are being extended as the younger population stagnates. This has brought openings in the labour market.

The pension and benefits systems have not really caught up. Nor has the general culture. I noticed this recently when I was asked to check the boxes on a banking application, quizzing me whether, at 68, I was: Retired / Working part-time / or Full-time.

 Actually, in some tax years I’m all three!

Governments and voters also seem confused. The Harper government raised the pensionable age to 67, then the Trudeau government rolled it back to 65. In France, attempts to raise the retirement age from 62 to 64 almost provoked a revolution.

Older workers can also be misconstrued as interlopers. In Ontario, for example, the retirement age for professors was broadly abolished in 2006, as long as these academics were “able to continue to perform their work duties”.

Media then focused on eager young grad students struggling to grasp the bottom of the career ladder as older faculty continued to teach into their 70s. But in truth, only a small minority of faculty in that age group chooses to keep teaching.

Courtesy
French writer Simone de Beauvoir argued in La Vieillesse (Old Age, 1970) that seniors needed more support and visibility.

Historic age changes

I feel this “age-quake” in my own family. My paternal grandparents were born in the late 19th century, in 1898 and 1899 respectively.

As such, they were born on farms before the Wright brothers’ first flight, then lived well into the era of satellites and moon landings. This was an astounding era of technical progress, by far the greatest ever. Just as astonishing perhaps was the jump in life expectancy.

The data agency Statista notes that life expectancy for Canadians born between 1891 and 1900 was 52 for women and just 49 for males.

Since then, Statistics Canada reports that life expectancy in Canada has greatly improved.

“Since the early 20th century. The life expectancy at birth for men has increased by 20.5 years, from 58.8 years in 1920–1922 to 79.3 years in 2009–2011. During the same period, the life expectancy of women increased by 23 years, from 60.6 years to 83.6 years.”

Sure enough, my father —  born in 1927 — lived a decade and a half longer than his parents.

Better nutrition and the advent of mass vaccinations were crucial. The decline of infant mortality showed these gains. Anyone strolling the cemeteries of the Eastern Townships notes the sad evidence of many infant deaths. StatsCan notes: “About 1 in 10 Canadian babies died within the first year of life in 1921, compared with about 1 in 200 in 2011”.

If they survived, prospects were fairly good; by 1920-1922, one-year-old boys in Canada were expected to live until age 64.7 and one-year-old girls until age 65.3.

This extension of life led, paradoxically, to new dilemmas. In 1935, U.S. President Franklin D Roosevelt introduced Social Security pension payments, starting at age 65. While a great social advance, it was a cruel irony that most people would never live to benefit, as the median age of death in America was then 62 years.

Once everyone started to live past their mid-60s, however, public pensions anchored a new social class – retired seniors.

Changes shape attitudes

Pessimism and bleak perspectives have often darkened our views of old age. Stereotypes portray seniors as helpless dependants.

Folk balladeer Joan Baez in her song Hello Out There sings that “old people, they just grow lonesome”. Isolation is still a serious issue, but far from universal these days for active old folks.

French philosopher Simone de Beauvoir in 1970 wrote a weighty tome titled La Vieillesse (Old Age). Colleagues were not too supportive. She noted: “When I say that I am working on an essay about old age, most often people exclaim: ‘Quelle idée! But you are not old! Such a sad subject’. This is precisely why I am writing this book: to break the conspiracy of silence. Regarding the elderly, society is not only guilty, but criminal”.

De Beauvoir wrote astutely that the aged are not some separate class or category: “Old people are just young people who suddenly find themselves old”, she concluded.

Balanced against the negative takes is the modern retirement industry’s chirpy invocation of the “golden years”, or the cheerleading notion that “age is just a number”.

UN health agency WHO defines ageing more bluntly: “At the biological level, ageing results from the impact of … a wide variety of molecular and cellular damage over time. This leads to a gradual decrease in physical and mental capacity, a growing risk of disease and ultimately death.” Hence the pessimism.

Today, WHO promotes healthy ageing, which it defines as “developing and maintaining the functional ability that enables well-being in older age”.

That trend continues to change the economy. The Vanier Institute of the Family reports that data from the Labour Force Survey (LFS) showed that “in 2022, approximately one in five people aged 65 to 74 were employed … these workers were more likely to report working primarily by choice than necessity”.

The more active seniors of the 2020s embody a new optimism. Fewer rocking-chairs are visible, especially amid all the leisure activities, part-time paycheques and continuing life interests. Long live that trend!

Age: it’s more than a number Read More »

Trump and his conflicts- it’s all in the books

By David Winch

Local Journalism Initiative

Donald Trump is dominating the news these days, “flooding the zone”, with multiple and often conflicting actions. News coverage is so intense, one wonders: is there anything to add? —But wait!

There are several angles on Trump that are worth highlighting.

During Trump’s first term, a couple of books impressed me. One was a work of politics, the other of psychology. These come to mind again today.

To start, the Mueller Report of 2019 on election interference and foreign influence was a lengthy (758 page), and very detailed FBI report. I read every page, reference and footnote.[1] It dominated headlines, was briefly debated, then disappeared.

The other book I often consulted was a work of psychology, one which helped explain why Trump’s actions often seemed incongruous or disturbing. The work, titled Our Inner Conflicts, was published in 1945 by a German-born psychotherapist, Dr. Karen Horney. I had picked it up in a Psych course at college, and her thesis struck me as insightful.

Damaged by conflicts

Horney posits, after her long history of clinical work, that many people are damaged by conflicts as children and cannot resolve these intense issues.

Such damaged people are often hobbled by inner tensions but still must navigate daily life. Horney concludes that they adopt one of three semi-conscious “coping strategies”: they may systematically move away from people (withdrawal) or move towards people (submission and compliance). Finally, they may reflexively move against people (assertiveness and aggression).

The symptoms of the latter, “move against” strategy define Trump to a T. They provide a key to understanding many inscrutable actions.

Why does he constantly pick fights? Why is he so mercurial and unpredictable? Canadians might wonder: Why does Trump make enemies of people he should befriend?

Dr. Horney’s analysis of such “conflicted” cases explains well Trump’s obsession with pointless fights (asserting his independence), his spontaneous dislikes (asserting dominance), and his unpredictable enthusiasms (defying others’ predictions).

It’s worth another read.

Courtesy
In 2017, a group of psychology professionals argued that Donald Trump was ill-suited to the Presidency.

‘Dangerous case’

However, a more recent set of psychiatric specialists have commented directly on “the case of Trump”.

Early in his first term, in 2017, a group of US psychiatrists protested the rule against psychiatrists trying to diagnose public figures. Called the “Goldwater Rule”, this professional guideline stood for nearly 60 years. The clinicians argued that this President was a mortal threat, and they needed to alert the public as to his psychic state.

The group published The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President (2018). In that collection of essays, the authors proposed that he was “impulsive, arrogant, ignorant, disorganised, chaotic, nihilistic, self-contradictory, self-important, and self-serving”.  Whew.

(There was some criticism that these mostly liberal psychiatry professionals were as much about politics as medicine. No conservatives were included saying, for example, that they liked Trump’s Republican policies, but were troubled by his personality.)

Trump’s re-election campaign prompted another protest. In October 2024, an open letter condemning Trump was signed by 233 psychology professionals and ran in the New York Times.

The signatories contended they had “an ethical duty to warn the public” that Donald Trump showed  “symptoms of severe, untreatable personality disorder—malignant narcissism— that make him deceitful, destructive, deluded, and dangerous. He is grossly unfit for leadership”.

In a new collection, titled The More Dangerous Case of Donald Trump (2024),psychology professionals again argued that the Goldwater rule was ill-suited to the present and full of loopholes.

Most of the authors agreed that Trump grew up under a tyrannical father who belittled his sons relentlessly. His father’s disapproval likely led to alcohol abuse by Trump’s older brother Fred.

One essay in The More Dangerous Case particularly caught my attention. Its author focused on “malignant narcissism” and its personal manifestations. As it turned out, the writer is a Canadian psychologist now living in Stratford, Ontario, Dr. Richard Wood. I contacted him and we had a wide-ranging discussion.

In his essay, Dr. Wood notes the rough upbringing Trump experienced under a demanding and hard-nosed father: “Becoming tough and ruthless like father and as relentlessly acquisitive was a Faustian bargain indeed. In order to be safe, Trump had to be willing to sacrifice his connection with others and his very humanity. To ensure he could never be invaded again and defined by someone else, he had to hold himself apart from meaningful engagement with other people, maintaining a tough guy posture, much like his father had, that denied need, dependence, and recognition of his own flawed humanity”.

In another essay, Wood had underlined that a child growing up this way “becomes implacably mistrustful, anticipating rapacity from others rather than love or generosity”.

Wood quotes psychologist Erich Fromm, who stated that malignant narcissism denoted “a grotesque expansion of grandiosity and omnipotence that produced profound distortions of the human character”.

Wood adds that psychoanalyst Otto Kernberg, who made “a deep investment in understanding malignant narcissism”, similarly found that it led to “grandiosity, extreme self-centeredness, and a remarkable absence of interest in and empathy for others”. In spite of this, those suffering from it can be politically successful as they “are still very eager to obtain admiration and approval from other people”.

While the contributors to The More Dangerous Case collection set out varied analyses, Wood notes that they agreed on the basics of malignant narcissism: “damaged or absent empathy, impaired thought process, and prominent paranoid elements”.

Malignant narcissism “tends, over a lifetime, to escalate the damage it imposes on the self”. No happy ending is evident.

We have been warned.


[1] The Mueller Report delivered a message that many U.S. observers found counterintuitive. As special prosecutor and former FBI head Robert Mueller wrote in his executive summary, “the investigation could not establish evidence of collaboration between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence”. That basically ended Congressional investigations and led to a separate impeachment process focusing on Ukraine.

Trump and his conflicts- it’s all in the books Read More »

Scroll to Top