Maria Cholakova

CSU council candidates call out Students for Better

CSU council candidates are calling out S4B. Photo Maria Cholakova

Maria Cholakova,
Local Journalism Initiative

The group is being accused of using student campaigning material without permission

New group Students for Better (S4B) has been accused of using student councillor campaigning materials without permission from the Concordia Student Union (CSU).

At 10:43 a.m. on March 8, S4B posted a campaign photo of Adam Mills, a candidate running for the CSU general elections, on Instagram. The post featured a screenshot of Mills’s campaign promises alongside his portrait and the caption “Adam is committed to better.” 

When Mills woke up in the morning, he said he was bombarded with messages from his friends who were asking about the post. He told The Link that he had not given S4B permission to use his photo and that he did not want an endorsement from the anonymous group. 

After finding out, Mills commented under the post and told the group to delete the endorsement. His comment was hidden. 

Around 45 minutes later, after Mills called out the group on his personal Instagram, a number of students started commenting to demand S4B take down the post. 

The post was deleted a few hours later.

Mills said he found the endorsement problematic, in part due to S4B being an anonymous group trying to influence the results of the election. 

“[S4B is] a third party [and] nobody knows who they are,” Mills said. “Imagine there was an outside company trying to get a contract from the CSU. They could easily influence the CSU in that way and get some councillors on board and some executives on board and easily get a contract.” 

He added that he also did not want to be associated with the company because he doesn’t know what their end goal is. 

Mills isn’t the only student who had not permitted their image to be used. Kinsey El Tanani, a student running for CSU council, was also endorsed by S4B. Her post was originally taken down on March 8 and reposted again on March 10 without her consent, and then taken down again. 

El Tanani told The Link that she found the endorsement troubling. 

“I believe I was targeted because I am Arab and less vocal about my political opinions compared to other candidates,” El Tanani said. “At no point was I asked for permission to be featured, nor did I ever indicate support for any of the propaganda S4B is spreading against the CSU.”

What do we (not) know about S4B? 

In mid-February, S4B started posting on Concordia University’s subreddit account r/Concordia, criticizing the CSU and urging people to vote in the upcoming CSU elections. Students reported seeing the organization’s sponsored posts on both Instagram and Reddit. 

On March 6, the group also had a paid advertisement at the Guy-Concordia metro station that read: “The CSU puts Concordia’s credibility in danger.”

The group is yet to disclose its finances publicly. 

According to S4B’s website, the organization’s mission is to push “for real leadership – seeking financial transparency, fighting for affordability and inclusivity, and ensuring that student government works for all students, not just a select few.”

S4B’s website also reads that the group “is a grassroots initiative driven by a group of students, alumni, and community members who share a deep commitment to fostering a productive environment for students on college campuses.”

However, S4B is yet to publicize who is running the group behind the scenes.

Mills thinks S4B’s involvement in the elections is a sign of the political climate on campus. 

“The administration’s always already [putting] into question the validity of how the CSU governs itself and its elections,” Mills said. “This certainly doesn’t help the legitimacy of the CSU.”

The Link has reached out to S4B for comment. At the time of publication, the organization is yet to reply. 

According to a promotional ad on Instagram, S4B is allegedly using advertising agency Mash Strategy, a firm based out of Calgary, Alberta. According to the CBC, the business is a “consulting firm that has done work for various conservative parties and leaders.” 

The Link has reached out to Mash Strategy to confirm their involvement with S4B. At the time of publication, the organization is yet to reply. 

This is a developing story. 

CSU council candidates call out Students for Better Read More »

The ecosystem of student politics

Graphic Panos Michalakopoulos

Maria Cholakova,
Local Journalism Initiative

What to know about the university’s undergraduate student union and associations

CSU

Founded in 1979, the Concordia Student Union (CSU) represents all undergraduate students at the university. Their job is to help students navigate university life and assist in advocating for issues to Concordia’s administration.

The CSU funds several services across campus. These include the CSU Advocacy Centre, the Housing and Job Resource Centre, the Legal Information Clinic, the Student Daycare and Nursery and a transitional housing pilot project that aims to provide temporary rent-free housing for students in need. The full list of CSU organizations and services can be found on the CSU’s website.

Politically, the CSU has actively been fighting against austerity and openly advocating for climate justice. They have also divested from Scotiabank for its investments in Elbit systems.

ASFA

Founded in 2001, the Arts and Science Federation of Associations (ASFA) is Concordia’s largest faculty-level student association, representing approximately 17,000 undergraduate students in the Faculty of Arts and Science. The federation represents 30 student associations across the faculty that serve the academic and accessibility interests of its members across different departments.

During the 2023-2024 academic year, ASFA actively campaigned against Quebec’s tuition hikes and advocated for a car-free Mackay Street with the help of Pedestrianize Mackay. Politically, ASFA has taken a stance in support of Palestinian solidarity, demanding the university divest from companies complicit in genocide and stand in support of Indigenous sovereignty.

CASA JMSB

The Commerce and Administration Students’ Association (CASA) is the undergraduate student association at the John Molson School of Business (JMSB). Representing over 7,000 business students, CASA is the umbrella organization for six student associations that represent different departments across JMSB. CASA is also in charge of two services: CASA’s Conference Program and their special funding for student projects.

Moreover, CASA is not known for its political activism, being the only student-run association not to participate in the anti-austerity movement during the 2023-2024 academic year.

ECA

The Engineering and Computer Science Association (ECA) represents all 6,800 undergraduate students at the Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science. Under the ECA umbrella, 17 student groups host different activities and workshops, most notably HackConordia and Space Concordia.

Politically, ECA is not the most outspoken. However, during the 2023-2024 academic year, the ECA voted to go on strike against Quebec’s tuition hikes.

FASA

The Fine Arts Student Alliance (FASA) is a student association comprised of over 3,000 Faculty of Fine Arts undergraduate students. FASA is known for its political activism. The association works in a non-hierarchical manner and is “committed to being an open, inclusive organization that recognizes diversity.” FASA also aims to provide access and inclusion to communities traditionally marginalized.

Like ASFA, during the 2023-2024 academic year FASA actively campaigned against Quebec’s tuition hikes and was the first association to go on strike. Additionally, they took a stance in support of Palestinian solidarity, demanding the university divest from complicit companies. The association also funds a BIPOC Solidarity grant and hosts a variety of political and artsy workshops for students.

This article originally appeared in Volume 45, Issue 1, published September 3, 2024.

The ecosystem of student politics Read More »

Concordia creates new task force to tackle racism on campus

Due to rise of racism on campus, Concordia has created a new task force which promises to create a safe campus space. Photo Matthew Daldalia

Maria Cholakova,
Local Journalism Initiative

The university promises to create a safe campus for students of diverse backgrounds

On April 3, Concordia President Graham Carr informed students by email that a new task force called Standing Together against Racism and Identity-based Violence (STRIVE) has been formed. 

The creation of the task force comes after months of increasing tension on campus. On Nov. 8, 2023, a confrontation in the Henry F. Hall building between Israeli and Palestinian students turned violent. More recently, on March 13, a few students from the Muslim Student Association (MSA) expressed that they do not feel safe on campus, due to claims of Zionist students verbally harassing them on a regular basis. Several members of MSA accused students of calling them terrorists, pro-Hamas supporters and MSA terrorists. 

According to Carr, since October 2023, there has been an increase in “manifestations of hate, acts of intimidation and other instances of identity-based violence.” In his statement, Carr said these incidents are unacceptable. 

The university created STRIVE as a result of increasing identity-based violence on campus. According to the university’s website, the task force will aim to address identity-based violence, strengthen anti-discrimination efforts and develop new policies and initiatives to combat discrimination at Concordia. 

The task force will consist of one overseeing body and six subcommittees. Each subcommittee will consist of one lead and three members representing staff, students and faculty. The subcommittees will tackle key issues, including antisemitism, anti-Arab racism, Islamophobia, anti-Asian racism, transphobia, as well as campus climate and campus engagement. 

For each subcommittee, the university will examine existing campus policies and systems in place for complaints. The university will also evaluate the community’s access to campus services and speak to the relevant Concordia and Montreal communities to deduce what measures are needed. 

According to Concordia’s website, the committees are seeking participants to join the task force. 

This isn’t the first time the university has created a task force. Concordia currently has one task force, the Task Force on anti-Black Racism. Alongside the task force, Concordia also created a committee on Sexual Misconduct and Sexual Violence in 2018—the latter of which has been heavily criticized by students. These criticisms involve being non-student-centric and unable to adequately deal with cases or listening to student complaints. 

Carr promises to notify the student body of any advancements or progress made by STRIVE. 

Concordia creates new task force to tackle racism on campus Read More »

Concordia hires external security firm founded by ex-Israeli soldier

Concordia hired security agents from firm founded by ex-IDF soldier. Graphic Tam Bedard

Maria Cholakova,
Local Journalism Initiative

The university spent over $30,000 on external security

From Sept. 30 to Nov. 22, 2024, Concordia University spent $33,683 on external security hires. 


On four different occasions, the university spent the money to hire the external company Perceptage International for a total of 14 days of work. 

What is Perceptage International? 

The security consulting firm Perceptage International was founded in 2008 by Adam Cohen, an ex-Israel Defence Forces (IDF) soldier, the national director of community security for the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA), and the director of community security for Federation CJA. Activists have heavily criticized all three companies for “anti-Palestinian practices.”  

Perceptage itself has been accused of hiring ex-IDF soldiers and having ties to the Israeli government.

In a now-deleted section of their website, Perceptage listed a total of nine security agents using only initials or pseudonyms and highlighted each member’s training, where all nine agents had completed an “Israeli Close Protection Course.” Currently, agent details are not available on the Perceptage website.

Students have also raised concerns about Perceptage’s connection with the security consulting company Moshav Security Consultants, a central division of Perceptage. Moshav is managed by Eyal Feldman, a reserve major in the Israeli army and a former special advisor to Israel’s Ministry of Defense. At the time of publication, Moshav’s website is unavailable.

Perceptage declined The Link’s request for an interview. 

According to Concordia deputy spokesperson Julie Fortier, the university has had no contact with Moshav. Fortier also claimed that all Perceptage agents hired by the university were Canadian armed forces veterans. 

Hiring of Perceptage

According to records acquired by The Link, the university hired the security company for 14 days during the Fall 2024 semester. The number of agents varied from day to day, from two to eight per shift. 

Agents were asked to wear beige pants or jeans, a black polo with no logos and a vest. Concordia provided the agents with velcro patches with the Concordia Safety and Prevention Services (CSPS) logo.  

The university hired the largest number of agents during the student strikes for Palestine, on Nov. 21 and Nov. 22. On those days, a total of eight agents were stationed across the campus per day, costing the university a total of $12,141. The agents’ duties were described as “crowd control and special intervention.”

The second largest number of agents hired was from the period of Sept. 30 to Oct.11, 2024, where four agents were stationed per day, costing the university over $20,235. Concordia hired the agents for “crowd control and special intervention” in anticipation of protests on Oct. 7. 

The only occasion where the university hired the company for an event not in direct relation to a Palestine demonstration was for a farewell event for Chancellor Jonathan Wener, hosted in the Eaton Centre on Nov. 6. Wener was Concordia’s chancellor since 2015. 

Infographic Maria Cholakova

Interactions with security during protests 

Perceptage agents have been accused of physically assaulting students while stationed at pro-Palestine demonstrations. According to a video posted on Solidarity for Palestine’s Honour and Resistance (SPHR)’s Instagram page on Nov. 22, during the student strikes for Palestine, Perceptage and other CSPS officers were seen aggressively pushing students away from picketing actions and into the stairway of the Henry F. Hall building, all the while, students shouted: “Don’t touch them, don’t shove them, these are Concordia students.” 

According to Fortier, “CSPS intervened after receiving a complaint when a group of protestors attempted to block access to a class where students had not voted to strike and wanted to attend class.”

“CSPS intervened to prevent an escalation between students,” Fortier said. 

Student criticism and concern

Students have criticized Concordia’s decision to hire Perceptage. According to ex-SPHR general coordinator and current Palestinian Youth Movement member Zeyad Abisaab, he feels the decision to hire Perceptage highlights the lack of care for student safety. 

“The main function of security is to provide safety and a sense of security to students,” Abisaab said. He believes that if you were to ask students how they feel around unknown mercenaries, students would not feel safe. 

Concordia Student Union (CSU) external affairs and mobilization coordinator Danna Ballantyne believes that the hiring of Perceptage was a way for Concordia to silence Palestinian voices on campus.

“I think the university throws around the word ‘apolitical,’” Ballantyne said. “None of their actions show that from the emails that they send the student body, to the force that they use against us, to where they put their money.”

According to Fortier, the university makes security-related decisions to ensure the safety of the community. 

“CSPS can hire other agents to support them depending on security needs for some events,” Fortier said. “This was the case last fall after aggressive behaviour, assault and vandalism occurred during recent demonstrations and as we knew larger demonstrations would take place.” 

Ballantyne disagrees. She thinks that the university only considers events violent when they disrupt those in power. She continued by saying that Concordia did not publically consider it violent when the SPVM attacked Palestinian students on campus.  

“What we see is psychological warfare against students,” Ballantyne said. “At the end of the day, by consistently pinning a certain demographic of students as violent, as assaulters, as agitators, you’re enabling violence against them, whether it be at the hands of security or whether it be at the hands of other students.” 

Moving forward, Abisaab thinks the university should release the names of the security guards who assaulted students and commit to never hiring Perceptage agents again. 

“The students of Concordia reject Perceptage being on campus,” Abisaab said. “The university needs to commit to never hiring them again and prohibiting them on campus.”

With files from Dana Hachwa 

This article originally appeared in Volume 45, Issue 7, published January 14, 2025.

Concordia hires external security firm founded by ex-Israeli soldier Read More »

Two students arrested at “Cops Off Campus” demonstration

Protesters marching down De Maisonneuve Blvd., chanting slogans denouncing the CSPS and the SPVM. Photo Maria Cholakova

Maria Cholakova & Hannah Scott-Talib,
Local Journalism Initiative

This marks another instance of students facing harassment and intimidation by police

Around three dozen autonomous students led a demonstration in front of the Concordia University Guy-De Maisonneuve building (GM), calling for an end to SPVM officer presence on campus. The demonstration resulted in two arrests.

“Essentially today, people are here to protest against the repression of students and the students that have been unjustly suspended, some of which without a tribunal,” said E.V. Cloix, who attended the protest and has long been in support of the “Cops Off Campus” movement. 

They believe the presence of police officers on campus is sparking worry among students. 

“I think there is a lot to lose for a lot of people, specifically students of colour who feel hypervisible confronting police,” said Cloix.

The demonstration started at 1:35 p.m., with some students wearing paper masks of Concordia’s Board of Governors and chanting “Hey hey, ho ho, SPVM has got to go.”

According to a student representative for the demonstration, who was granted anonymity for safety reasons, the event was organized in response to the police brutality that has taken place on campus since the start of the fall semester. 

“The police force, as well as the Concordia Security and Prevention Services (CSPS), have clearly demonstrated that they are [not] here to protect us, the people, but rather [they are here] to protect private property and the interest of the institution,” they said. 

At 1:20 p.m., demonstrators saw at least six CSPS officers blocking the doors to the GM building and heavy police presence surrounding the university grounds.

At 2:30 p.m., students started marching down De Maisonneuve Blvd., chanting slogans denouncing the CSPS and the SPVM. 

The protest escalated at around 3 p.m. when protesters circled a group of CSPS officers in the Concordia tunnels between the Guy-Concordia metro station and the J.W. McConnell Library Building (LB) and Henry F. Hall Building. Protesters shouted anti-police chants which led the group of officers back towards the metro station. 

In response, the CSPS officers called for backup and began moving the crowd back up the tunnels toward the LB building. As this was happening, Cloix alleged that one CSPS officer began chasing a student down the tunnels. This student was detained by SPVM officers minutes later in the LB building.

Outside the Leonard & Bina Ellen Art Gallery, located in the LB building, demonstrators were met with around 20 SPVM and CSPS officers. At least one other protester was grabbed by SPVM officers and detained, and several other protesters were shoved by SPVM officers. 

SPVM officers then forced the crowd outside onto the sidewalk of De Maisonneuve Blvd. in front of the LB Building, where one officer warned the crowd that further confrontation with the SPVM would lead to criminal charges of obstruction. Chants continued from protesters for another few minutes before the crowd dispersed.

According to SPVM media representative Caroline Chèvrefils, police officers arrested two students for assaulting a university security guard. Both students were later released with summons.

According to Fiona Downey, Concordia University’s spokesperson, the univeristy is “dismayed that what began as a peaceful protest on Oct. 31 degenerated into assault and vandalism.” She further clarified that police was called on campus after protesters allegedly assaulted a CSPS officer who sustained minor injuries and that protesters threw furniture at students. 

“I think it’s inappropriate for there to be so much police presence [on campus] when people are literally just enacting their rights as students to have a voice and be heard,” said Cloix in response to the behaviour of the SPVM. “[We want] to also request that not only our tuition not be used to fund a genocide, but that [the university] still give people a right to advocate for themselves and not just get suspended unjustly.”

Cloix isn’t the only student who feels this way. According to the student representative, the university is acting against its own students. 

“If the university was smart, they would actually tap into the mobilization power of their students,” they said. “If we had support (from the university), instead of repression from our administration, we could actually be mobilizing to help with things like the tuition hikes.” 

The day’s demonstration was not the only sign of students’ disapproval with the amount of police presence on campus. On Oct. 30, the Concordia Student Union (CSU), alongside the Arts and Science Federation of Associations, the Fine Arts Students Alliance, the Concordia, Research and Education Workers Union, the School of Community & Public Affairs Student Association, the Geography Undergraduate Student Society, the Political Science Student Association, the Sociology and Anthropology Student Union, the Urban Planning Association and the Women and Sexuality Studies Student Association, shared a press release on their Instagram accusing the university of police brutality and racial discrimination. The CSU will hold a press conference on Nov.1 to further discuss their statement. 

Two students arrested at “Cops Off Campus” demonstration Read More »

CSU accuses Concordia of police brutality and racial discrimination

Student union setting up for press conference against police brutality infront of the Henry F. Hall Building. Photo Maria Cholakova

Maria Cholakova,
Local Journalism Initiative

The student union held a press conference to discuss police brutality on campus

On Nov. 1, the Concordia Student Union (CSU) held a press conference in front of the Henry. F. Hall Building where they accused the university of police brutality and racial discrimination. 

The press conference was announced in a joint statement with nine other student associations two days earlier on Oct. 30. The statement called for the immediate removal of all police officers on campus; that the university publicly commits to forbidding police presence on campus; and for Campus Safety and Prevention Services (CSPS) to formally sever their relationship with the SPVM. 

In addition, they demanded that CSPS publicly commits to abolishing five practices:
following students off campus; conducting citizen’s arrests; physical apprehension and detainment; preemptively coordinating response with police prior to political demonstrations; and facilitating police brutality and arrest instead of engaging in de-escalation.

CSU external affairs and mobilization coordinator Danna Ballantyne was the first to speak at the press conference.

“In the last few weeks, our students have been arrested, detained and even physically brutalized, all while conducting non-violent political demonstrations,” she said. “We deserve to come to campus to learn and to have open dialogue without fearing for our safety.”

Since the start of the fall semester, four students have been arrested at demonstrations, leading many to speak out against the university. 

“After months of Concordia students being stalked and harassed by CSPS, brutalized by police on campus, international students fearing deportation, […] students have had enough,” CSU academic and advocacy coordinator Vanessa Massot said. “We demand that Concordia do better. Student leadership has been met with nothing but inaction from the university’s administration.” 

Students aren’t the only ones speaking out against the university. Norma Rantisi, a professor in the geography, planning and environment department, spoke out in support of students, staff and faculty who have felt targeted by police. 

“Students have had a longstanding engagement with social movements and with organizing for justice. For this, students should be commended, not repressed; their voices uplifted, not censored; their activism supported, not criminalized,” Rantisi said. “Heightened policing and surveillance on our university campuses not only presents a dangerous setting for students, but also for marginalized faculty and staff.”

CSU accuses Concordia of police brutality and racial discrimination Read More »

Students picket and take over Hall building on first day of strikes

Students protesting on the 12th floor of the Hall building. Photo Andraé Lerone Lewis

Maria Cholakova & Safa Hachi,
Local Journalism Initiative

Over two dozen students were picketing classes and hundreds rallied in front of the Hall building

Nov. 21 marked the first day of an international university strike movement for Palestine. 

The strikes were organized by 11 Concordia University student associations and one faculty association on campus, comprising over 11,000 students across Concordia. Across Montreal, 85,000 students are striking on Nov. 21 and Nov. 22. 

Strikes and picketing

The morning strikes started as early as 8 a.m., with groups of students dispatching from Le Frigo Vert to different classes across the Sir George Williams campus. 

Pickets were peaceful, and most of the picketed classes were successfully cancelled on-site or beforehand by professors. For soft-picketed classes, picketers entered classrooms and encouraged students to join the movement. 

Police presence was minimal in the morning, with few police cars surrounding the campus. 

According to Danna Ballantyne, external affairs and mobilization coordinator at the Concordia Student Union, these strikes are a denunciation of violence.

“They are meant to show the administration that we don’t want any part in the violence they are taking part in,” Ballantyne said, referring to Concordia’s recent increase in police on campus, which had led to four student arrests. 

Rally at Hall building

The student movement grew more active at 2 p.m. for a “Support the Strike” rally organized by Solidarity for Palestine’s Honour and Resistance (SPHR), as an extension of the overall day of strikes. The demonstration started off with around 100 people, who were joined by several hundred students from Dawson College and McGill University 10 minutes into the rally. 

Before the rally, SPHR and student associations had made their strike demands public. Their demands include: for Concordia to publicize their full investment portfolio; for the university to seize all employment partnerships with military companies; for the university to publically condemn the genocide in Gaza; for the university to prohibit police presence on campus; and for the administration to “stop its repression campaign on students.”  

The demonstration began with chants from SPHR organizers demanding that the university divest.

According to Zeyad Abisaab, ex-general coordinator of SPHR and current Palestinian Youth Movement member, the student movement has grown too strong for the university. 

“Today, as we see, is a historic day for the student movement. 11,000 students are on strike at Concordia, 11,000 students saying they do not want to be complicit with Israel, 11,000 students demanding that Concordia cut ties with weapons companies,” Abisaab said. “Concordia has ignored these demands.” 

On Nov. 19, two days before the strikes, Concordia had sent out an email to students asking for peaceful strikes and for all students to renounce violence.

“Every Concordian has the right to study and work without fear of experiencing physical violence, witnessing vandalism or being the target of harassment. As a community, we must agree that attacks on people and property are simply unacceptable and cannot be tolerated,” the email stated. 

Soon after students joined the rally, demonstrators entered the Henry F. Hall building, where four Concordia Safety and Prevention Service (CSPS) officers were blocking the entrance. 

Despite CSPS officers’ attempts at restraining students from entering the Hall building, students made their way inside to the main floor, chanting “Free, free Palestine.” 

Demonstrators stayed on the main floor for roughly 20 minutes, chanting, waving Palestinian flags and demanding the university divest from genocide. 

For many participants, the strike represented both a personal and collective stand. 

“Knowing I can have an impact means a lot,” Concordia student Kris Wachniak said. “Look at how many people showed up to express solidarity, it’s truly moving.”

Wachniak was not the only student feeling this way. 

“Thousands of us are supporting this strike for a reason,” said a student who wanted to keep their name anonymous for fear of academic repercussions. “Our governments and schools do nothing. It sits on my conscience to know my money is funding these war machines.” 

At 2:43 p.m., Concordia sent out an emergency alert to students, encouraging them to avoid the area in and around the Hall building and to evacuate if they felt they needed to. 

Five minutes before Concordia’s mass email, students had started moving up the floors of the Hall building, continuing their demonstration. 

In big groups, students walked up the escalators, banging on the sides, ringing bells and chanting slogans like “Disclose, divest, we will not stop we will not rest.” 
 

Around 3:00 p.m., protesters exited the Hall Building and gathered briefly outside before beginning a march down De Maisonneuve Blvd. W. towards Guy St., eventually circling back to Mackay St. Protesters carried signs, flags and a large cardboard cutout of Concordia President Graham Carr.  

While most of the strike remained focused on calls for divestment and solidarity with Palestine, a smaller pro-Israel group gathered nearby at the intersection of Mackay St. and De Maisonneuve Blvd. W., surrounded by SPVM officers. Despite tensions, no altercations occurred, though both groups exchanged chants. 

No arrests were made on campus. 

Students picket and take over Hall building on first day of strikes Read More »

Ex-Israeli defence soldier event interrupted by counter-protest

Over a dozen SPVM officers were stationed in the Henry F. Hall Building due to an altrecation between groups. Photo Maria Cholakova

Maria Cholakova,
Local Journalism Initiative

Police separated StartUp Nation and pro-Palestine students in the Henry F. Hall Building

On Dec. 3, over two dozen pro-Palestine students protested the invitation of Yoseph Haddad, a former Israeli Defense Forces soldier at the Henry F. Hall Buidling.

The event was organized by Concordia University’s Israeli group StartUp Nation. Over two dozen students and pro-Israel supporters gathered at the Hall building mezzanine for an event hosting Haddad. 

Haddad’s presence on campus was marketed as a tabling event where students would have the chance to speak and ask him questions.

The event started at 12 p.m., with Haddad giving a speech to participants and media. At around 12:40 p.m., over two dozen pro-Palestine students joined and began chanting in opposition to the event. The two groups clashed in front of the mezzanine elevators.

Escalations  

Following the arrival of counterprotesters, Haddad, who has been criticized for denying the Palestinian genocide, approached several Concordia Student Union (CSU) executives, attempting to speak to them at arms lenght. The CSU executives did not interact with the speaker. 

Tensions kept growing between the two groups, with protesters shouting through megaphones and Haddad chanting “Terrorists off campus” while facing the pro-Palestine students. The majority of the chants came from counter-protestors, with SPHR chanting “Free, free Palestine” from the start of the altercation to its end. 

According to Zeyad Abisaab, former SPHR general coordinator and current Palestinian Youth Movement member, Concordia students have made their demands clear. 

“Bringing someone that is a genocide apologist, who spreads hate, racism and Islamophobia wherever he goes, is not something that the Concordia students tolerate,” Abisaab said. 

Over 10 students approached Concordia’s Campus Safety and Prevention Services (CSPS) officers, pleading and demanding that the officers break up or separate the two groups. Instead, CSPS agents blocked access to the building’s escalators until the SPVM arrived.  

According to Abisaab, for students to feel safe on campus, Concordia needs to divest from companies complicit in the Palestinian genocide. 

SPVM arriving on campus 

At around 12:55 p.m., over 15 SPVM officers arrived on the scene. Ten minutes later, the police separated the two groups by taping off a portion of the mezzanine floor. Agents then proceeded to create a human barrier between the two groups. 

An hour after the counter-protest started, StartUp Nation and Haddad exited the Hall building and continued their demonstration outside. 

Aftermath

CSU external affairs and mobilization coordinator Danna Ballantyne claims the union did everything possible to prevent escalation. She said that after learning about the event, the CSU contacted StartUp Nation stating that the club was breaking CSU and Concordia regulations on space usage. 

According to a CSU email concerning booking tables, acquired by The Link, StartUp Nation answered “not applicable”  to the question of having an external member coming to the table. This violated Article 16 of Concordia’s and CSU’s policy on the temporary use of university spaces.  

In an attempt to stop the event the CSU also removed all tables from the mezzanine. 

Ballantyne also claims that the CSU was in contact with the acting dean of students and CSPS before the start of the event. Ballantyne stressed her disappointment in the lack of action from CSPS. 

“We were really hoping that today, the administration and [CSPS] […] would do their due diligence, and make sure all steps were taken to prevent these policy violations and this individual, who is a known Islamophobe, from stepping on campus,” she said.   

This altercation comes a month after the student union accused the university of allowing CSPS agents to racially profile students. 

According to Julie Fortier, Concordia’s spokesperson, the “CSU informed us of the event yesterday, when we understand they cancelled the tabling request. We also informed [StartUp Nation] that they had not followed the protocol for this tabling as they did not mention an external individual would be present and asked that they not proceed with the event.” 

When asked for a comment regarding student’s concerns over the presence of a former soldier on campus, the university did not answer to the question. 

Ex-Israeli defence soldier event interrupted by counter-protest Read More »

New chatbot app to help students is in the works

Concordia students are working on a new chatbot. Courtesy Keaty

Maria Cholakova,
Local Journalism Initiative

Creators want Keaty to help with student questions and time management

A team of Concordia University students are working on a new chatbot app called Keaty.

App creators Vicky Leia Liu and Taief Ahmed say that Keaty aims to help students manage their study time and track assignments, among other things. 

According to the creators, the app has two main uses for students. One part of the app is aimed at answering common student questions. Another use for the app is a smart calendar function, which can be tailored to each student’s classes and habits.

In order to make the app as student-friendly as possible, the Keaty team surveyed over 200 students to help narrow down the most useful functions for the app.  

The creators say the inspiration behind creating Keaty came from personal struggle. More precisely, it came from Ahmed’s struggles with transferring his program of study from software engineering to electrical engineering. 

“The easiest way would have been to just ask an advisor, but I didn’t want to waste their time,” Ahmed said. “So I thought, wouldn’t it be nice if there was a chatbot that just answered the most basic, frequently asked questions about universities? And I thought, you know what, we definitely can build such a thing with the recent advancements in large language models.” 

Once they started working on Keaty, the team applied for Phase I of the Gina Cody Research and Innovation Fellowships. The funding provides students with up to $15,000 to fund innovative ideas at the university. 

After pitching the idea to a team of judges, Keaty’s creators were awarded $10,000 for their project. 

Since the creation of Keaty, the team has spent over $4,000 on creating the app. Half of that money went to honorariums for the app developers and around $1,000 was dedicated to training the neural network. Other miscellaneous costs included an Apple developer license and marketing.  

Leia Liu and Ahmed hope the app will be ready for students to download in April, but right now, they said they are focused on the app’s beta testing. 

They hope that student beta tests will help make the app as effective as possible.

They also hope to collaborate with the Concordia Student Union (CSU) on promoting the app to increase their reach.

“If our app can help us, it can definitely help all the students,” Ahmed said. “So the help of the CSU [could] spread the usage for all students [to] also benefit from that.” 

This article originally appeared in Volume 45, Issue 10, published March 4, 2025.

New chatbot app to help students is in the works Read More »

CREW begins striking for better pay

Photo Maria Cholakova

Maria Cholakova,
Local Journalism Initiative

The union accused the university of scabbing on day one of strikes

The Concordia Research and Education Workers Union (CREW) officially began its strike on March 12. The union is demanding that Concordia University increase the wages of its teaching assistants (TAs) and research assistants (RAs). 

On the first day of its strike, the union accused Concordia of encouraging professors to cross picket lines. 

According to Concordia spokesperson Julie Fortier, “the university has been and will continue to comply with all applicable labour legislation.”

The downtown picket line began at 8:00 a.m. and continued until 3:00 p.m. Several speakers from different Confédération des syndicats nationaux unions were present at the strike to encourage and support attendees. 

According to Jason Langford, a member of CREW’s bargaining committee, going on strike was a necessary decision that the union did not take lightly.

Stephen Gnanasihamany, one of CREW’s bargaining officers, addressed the crowd.

“The message from our members is very clear. Our members are in financial crisis,” Gnanasihamany said. “We need immediate relief in the form of an improved wage offer, and nothing else is going to cut it.”

Energy was high during the strike, with members chanting, playing songs and serving food throughout the day. 

CREW members and supporters chanted, “Graham Carr get out, we know what you’re all about,” and “Cuts, job losses, money for the bosses.” 

According to Agustin Rugiero Bader, a CREW member and part-time professor at Concordia, the university needs to respect its workers. 

“It’s very, very important that people feel supported and that they feel that they actually matter inside the community. […] Politics is always about putting your money where your mouth is,” Bader said. “I think Concordia has an opportunity to do that now. I know we’re facing decreased enrolment and things like that, but making the university more inhospitable to students and to workers is never going to be a solution.”

CREW’s strike has no end date yet. On March 13, the union will have a bargaining meeting with the university, where CREW representatives hope a deal will be reached. If bargaining is not successful, the strike will continue. 

CREW begins striking for better pay Read More »

Student raises concerns with $4.2 million Studentcare contract

The CSU signed $4.2 million Studentcare Legal Care Program contract. Photo Ireland Compton

Maria Cholakova & Geneviève Sylvestre,
Local Journalism Initiative

A $30 fee-levy for the Studentcare Legal Care Program will be included in the next CSU by-elections

At the last Concordia Student Union (CSU) Regular Council Meeting (RCM), student and ex-council member Dave Plant raised concerns with the Studentcare Legal Care Program (LCP).

On July 17, the CSU hosted a Special Council Meeting (SCM) where councillors unanimously voted in favour of implementing the LCP. The program offers students legal representation in areas such as housing, employment and human rights disputes, as well as legal consultations. 

The LCP contract signed by the CSU came into effect Sept. 1, and the initial term will last until Dec. 31. In order for services to continue, students will have to vote in the upcoming Fall 2024 CSU by-elections in favour of extending the program for an additional three years and eight months.

The CSU chair sent the LCP contract to The Link in an email on Sept. 13.

The contract, if passed, will cost $30 per student per year, totalling $1,050,000 per year for 35,000 students and $4,200,000 over four years. 

After four years, the contract would automatically renew unless the CSU provided Studentcare with a written notice stating otherwise 30 days prior to the end date of the contract. 

Costs and fees

If passed at referendum, the CSU would use insurance surplus to pay for the initial four-month term of the Studentcare contract at the cost of $10 per student. The CSU would also renounce its right to unilaterally terminate the contract. 

Insurance surplus refers to money that has been paid by students for their insurance, but has not been used. In the SCM minutes, CSU general coordinator Kareem Rahaman said that the CSU can only use the money in limited ways. 

“We can either use it to reduce premiums—but we’ve already reduced the premium—or we can use it to subsidize other services and that’s what we’re trying to do here,” Rahaman said.

At the SCM, Rahaman also told councillors that “Studentcare offered to pay from Sept. 1 up until the referendum.” 

However, according to the review letter commissioned by Plant, “​​The fee applicable for this initial term is $10 per student, for a total cost of $350,000. Assuming an approximate undergraduate student number enrolment of 35,000 members for the CSU.”

When The Link asked Rahaman to clarify this statement, he explained that he was referring to the fact that “[payment] isn’t going to come out of your pocket this semester, but you’re going to receive [access to the LCP] this semester. So, it’s deferred.” 

The contract signed by the CSU states: “In the instance of the Referendum passing, the CSU would use accumulated Reserve Funds in order to cover the expenses of the program for the period of September-December 2024 at a pro-rated cost of $10.00 per Member including HST or until the new levy is introduced.”

According to the legal review, if students vote against the LCP at referendum, the CSU will still have to pay for the initial four-month term of the Studentcare contract, with the cost split between the union and Studentcare, totalling $175,000 dollars.

According to Rahaman, only students covered by the CSU Health and Dental Plan would account for the $10, making the total cost closer to $100,000. During the SCM, Rahaman told councillors that the CSU would take a “minor hit” in the event of a failure at referendum. 

When a councillor at the RCM brought forward a question regarding the amount the CSU would lose if the referendum were to fail, Plant said, “Is $175,000 minor? I’ll leave that to you to decide.”

Not an insurance product 

At the RCM, Plant presented a legal review of the LCP contract that he had commissioned and motioned for the contract to be immediately cancelled. 

One of his main concerns with the LCP is that, as opposed to the other services Studentcare offers through the CSU Health and Dental Plan, it is not an insurance product.

According to Plant, council members were running on false pretences and misinformation. 

“Just through the minutes that got brought up in [the SCM], there are falsehoods. I think it’s up to the executives to lay out, in layman’s terms, what the council members are voting for,”  Plant said. “The only reason I understood how bad of a deal this was, is through a legal review of the contract.”

In the SCM minutes from July, Rahaman told council members prior to council voting on the LCP contract that “it’s an insurance product.”

Rahaman later clarified to The Link that he misspoke, as he is used to referring to the service as an insurance product colloquially.  

Studentcare’s role
 
Other issues raised by Plant in both the RCM and legal review concern clauses assessing Studentcare’s role in the contract. The legal review outlines how Studentcare has sole discretion on selecting a law firm to deliver the LCP, Studentcare and its directors may become minority shareholders in the chosen law firm, and Studentcare is not responsible for the quality of the LCP.

When asked about why that was the case, Rahaman explained that “it’s something we look at for sure. […] Every other university that’s signing these contracts, we’re all signing the same contract here. No issues [have] ever arisen from it.”

According to Studentcare representative Alexander Golovko, the service would be helpful for students at the university. 

“We truly believe that the [LCP] would be a significant enhancement to the student experience at Concordia,” said Golovko. “Concordia students would be joining over 300,000 students covered by the program across the country.” 

Rahaman made reference to the high level of satisfaction of the LCP in other universities in Quebec and Canada, including McGill. The Link has not been sent these statistics by the CSU  in time for publication. 

Current services 

The CSU currently has its own services that provide students with help around topics like housing, employment, academic disputes and legal questions in the form of the Advocacy Centre, the Housing and Job Resource Centre (HOJO), and the Legal Information Clinic (LIC).

“I think people who go to Concordia enjoy these little services that are offered to them, like a stone’s throw away,” Plant said. “LIC, HOJO, Advocacy Centre, you can just go into their offices, go and chat with them.”

Rahaman explained that Studentcare will work in tandem with existing CSU services to complement the coverage students already have. 

Studentcare coverage 

The legal review letter outlines that, according to the contract, the LCP does not offer representation to students who are otherwise already covered by a government agency or union. In the case of employment rights representation, areas already covered by the Commission des normes, de l’équité, de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (CNESST) are not covered by Studentcare. 

CNESST already covers complaints relating to labour standards, pay equity, occupational health and safety, hazardous situations, and complaints concerning the contracting process. 

Additionally, Studentcare does not offer human rights representation in situations where a student is already covered by the Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse (CDPDJ).

Further concerns in legal review

According to information given by a councillor at the Sept. 18 RCM and confirmed by the chair, councillors were given 45 hours to read through and decipher the LCP contract and talk to their constituents before SCM in July. This is in line with existing CSU by-laws and procedures.

When the contract was presented to council, it had already been signed by CSU general manager Robert Henri three weeks prior. 

According to Rahaman, Henri’s signature was meant only as a show of support, and the fully signed contract containing the signatures of Rahaman and CSU finance coordinator Souad El Ferjani was only sent to Studentcare after the motion to approve the contract was passed at the SCM.

The legal review also highlights that the LCP does not cover legal representation for immigration law, a field of law the letter claims is “very much in demand by the many international students who are members of the CSU.” 

During the SCM, Rahaman told councillors, “You pay $30 in advance and you have access to a lawyer for housing and immigration law.” He later clarified with The Link that he was only referring to legal consultation. 

At the RCM, councillors voted to create a standing committee to overview the contract. At the time of publication, the committee has not yet met. 

A previous version of this article stated that the legal review letter highlights the LCP’s lack of legal representation for international law. In fact, the legal review highlights the lack of representation for immigration law. The Link regrets this error. 

This article originally appeared in Volume 45, Issue 3, published October 1, 2024.

Student raises concerns with $4.2 million Studentcare contract Read More »

Queer Concordia pilot project struck down at CSU finance committee

Queer Concordia’s pilot project was struck down by CSU finance committee. Photo Maria Cholakova

Geneviève Sylvestre,
Local Journalism Initiative

The committee points to lack of funds as the reason why the motion was denied

On Sept. 30, Queer Concordia senior coordinator Jessica Winton presented her gender-affirming care loan pilot project in front of the Concordia Student Union (CSU) finance committee, where councillors voted against moving forward with the project.

The project aimed to connect students seeking gender-affirming care with short-term and interest-free loans to help them relieve some of the financial burden associated with paying for gender-affirming care. 

The CSU’s Health and Dental Plan currently covers $5,000 per procedure and has a $10,000 lifetime maximum for gender-affirming care surgeries and treatments. This can make it hard for students to access care, as procedure costs can often exceed $10,000.  

Additionally, according to the CSU website, there is currently no pay-direct coverage available, meaning that students seeking care must first pay for their procedures out-of-pocket. 

Winton asked the committee for a maximum of $100,000. According to the finance committee minutes, councillors voted against the project as the CSU is currently faced with high expenses and dropping income due to low enrollment, making the project not “sustainable to the CSU.”

According to CSU finance coordinator Souad El Ferjani, the finance committee only has a total funding of $20,000. She added that, as finance coordinator, she does not chair all other committees and does not have the power to pull funds from other committees.

“We [had] plans for bursaries for businesses, we had plans for having financial literacy workshops for international students and for students in general, we had plans for a business fair,” El Ferjani said. “We had a lot of big plans for the whole year, so giving away the [whole] $20,000 did not make sense to the councillors.”

El Ferjani also added that it did not make sense for the councillors to allocate the few remaining funds to the Queer Concordia project.

“It’s very insulting if somebody comes and asks for $100,000 and I give them $2,000,” she said.

Additionally, El Ferjani told The Link that the finance committee did consider using funds from the operations budget to pay for the project. Ultimately, as the CSU is already in a deficit this year due in part to the tuition hikes, councillors decided that it would not be a financially sound decision. 

Winton added that she had also asked the financial committee to consider using the insurance surplus currently allocated to the Studentcare Legal Care Program to fund the pilot project.

“They said they would get back to me on that, but they did not,” Winton said, “and when I look at the minutes from the meeting that suggestion is not within the minutes at all either.”

Winton requested to present an amended version of the motion to council at the second CSU regular council meeting (RCM) on Oct. 9. The then-CSU chairperson Michelle Lam denied her request.

According to El Ferjani, Lam did not allow Winton to present her motion because the council had already decided to defer the project to the finance committee during the first RCM, and the finance committee had come to a decision. 

“This does not close the door for Queer Concordia to go to other committees, but to go back to council again does not make any sense because council has already taken the decision to send it to the finance committee,” El Ferjani said.

Winton said she believes that CSU members did not properly read her motion or take it seriously, citing that the motion only asked for a maximum of $100,000 and that councillors did not ask her questions during the finance committee meeting. 

“We’re just looking to essentially use money that the CSU has sitting around in their Student Space, Accessible Education, and Legal Contingency fund or other committees to always circulate it with the loan program for people to be able to access the gender-affirming care,” she said, “because you have to pay upfront for your procedures most of the time and that’s a very large financial barrier that most people face.”

El Ferjani said she believes councillors did not ask questions during the finance committee meeting because they had already read the motion and listened to Winton’s presentation during the first RCM.

“They were aware of the motion, they had the time to read the motion prior to the RCM, they listened to Jessica during the RCM, they [had] heard the questions during the RCM,” El Ferjani said, “so my thought process is that they already knew a lot of [this] information.”

Three of the committee’s four councillors were present for Winton’s presentation, with the fourth arriving later according to El Ferjani, and the student at large seat was and remains vacant. Winton requested to be appointed to fill the seat, but Lam denied the request.

Lam wrote in an email, which was sent to The Link, that procedure requires a student to first apply to the appointments committee and then have their appointment ratified by council before being able to sit on the committee. The former chairperson added that, even if Winton was appointed to fill the seat, she would not be able to vote on a Queer Concordia project as it would be deemed a conflict of interest. 

Winton expressed frustration over the lack of transparency, saying that the CSU website can be difficult to navigate and is not up to date, with the minutes from the first RCM where she had originally presented her motion having not yet been added to the website. 

According to Winston, more students should be aware of the CSU’s inner workings and how much money they possess.

“Student groups such as ours, […] it shouldn’t be our duty and our mandate to have to charge students more money by raising our fee levy to alleviate services the CSU is supposed to provide and to advocate for themselves,” she said. 

Looking forward, Winton said that Queer Concordia is able to dedicate around $20,000 of surplus to fund the project. She also said she is considering other avenues to fund her pilot project, such as applying to the Sustainability Action Fund and the Concordia Council on Student Life’s special project funding. 

Queer Concordia pilot project struck down at CSU finance committee Read More »

Concordia University remains silent on assault of Palestinian student

Chris Bahnan stands in front of the Henry F. Hall Building where he was assaulted weeks prior. Photo Alice Martin

Maria Cholakova,
Local Journalism Initiative

Activists are calling on the university to address the assault of Christopher Bahnan

Over 56 days have passed since Christopher Bahnan was assaulted in the Henry F. Hall Building. 

On Dec. 17, after he finished a final exam, a man aggressively bumped into Bahnan as he was about to enter the Hall building. The aggressor challenged him to a fight while using racist and homophobic insults. Bahnan gave him the middle finger. 

Before Bahnan was able to enter the Hall building, the man attacked Bahnan, pushing him into the building’s vestibule. The man proceeded to punch Bahnan in the face and tried to rip his keffiyeh off his body. The suspect had to be pulled off of Bahnan by nearby student witnesses. 

Concordia’s Campus Safety and Prevention Services (CSPS) allegedly went to talk to Bahnan five minutes after the incident had occurred.

“I was surrounded by a number of security agents who all began pulling out little notebooks and asked me a variety of invasive questions while I was trying to deal with the assault that I was just subjected to,” Bahnan said. “Writing in their little notebooks, [CSPS] claimed that I’d been in a fight, which I denied and tried to correct them saying this wasn’t a fight, I was assaulted.”

After 45 minutes, the SPVM arrived on the scene and Bahnan submitted an incident report with both the Montreal police and CSPS. Following the assault, Bahnan went straight to the emergency room.

“I saw an emergency room doctor who prescribed me some antibiotics and gave me a CT scan,” Bahnan said. “When we got the results from the CT scan, [the doctor] said it was a very good thing that we did this because [I] have a fractured sinus wall and I might need surgery.” 

Bahnan is still waiting to hear if he needs surgery from a specialist at that hospital. He hasn’t received any updates from the SPVM since the incident. 

According to Bahnan, CSPS’s actions after the incident were not up to par. 
Director of CSPS Darren Dumoulin called Bahnan after the incident to express his sympathy and condolences regarding the attack. 

“What he failed to do was to inform me of any meaningful resources that would be available to me,” Bahnan said.

Bahnan alleged that Dumoulin refused to issue a statement or warn students about the assault.

“[Dumoulin] mentioned [to me] that CSPS is always there for their students when they are in need,” Bahnan said, “which I immediately rebuked and said, ‘Well, clearly not, because I was assaulted and CSPS did nothing to help me.’” 

According to Concordia spokesperson Julie Fortier, “It is inaccurate to say that Darren Dumoulin was dismissive when in fact he called the student the next day to check in on them and see if they needed anything. He also referred them to Health Services and told them to call him back if accessing care proved difficult. The student did not call him back.” 

At the time of publication, the university has yet to release a statement on the incident. Bahnan said he thinks that the university’s inaction is far from surprising.

“It’s a long-standing tradition of Concordia to maintain a passive voice and refuse to take any responsibility for the lack of security and safety that they provide for their students,” Bahnan said. “It’s very clear that it’s a disproportionate amount of support that gets given to certain students over other students, and I unfortunately happen to land in the latter rather than the former.”

Vanessa Massot, Concordia Student Union’s (CSU) academic and advocacy coordinator, agreed with Bahnan’s sentiment.

“We just want students to be able to be on campus and have a right to academia,” Massot said. “[Concordia] continues to ignore the rise in anti-Arab and anti-Palestinian racism, and when it happens so blatantly on their campus, their failure to acknowledge it really just shows that their priority is not the safety or the well-being of the students.”

On Jan. 6, the CSU released a statement regarding the incident. In it, they condemned the “racially and sexually motivated attack” and accused the administration of ignoring Bahnan’s request for the university to publicly acknowledge his incident.

According to Fortier, the university cannot comment on whether or not the assault was a “hate crime” because the police investigation has not yet concluded its findings. 

When asked in an email why the university has yet to release a statement on the attack, Fortier did not provide an answer. 

This article originally appeared in Volume 45, Issue 9, published February 11, 2025.

Concordia University remains silent on assault of Palestinian student Read More »

McGill contracts private security firm to dismantle pro-Palestine encampment

McGill hires private security firm to dismantle pro-Palestine encampment. Courtesy Cheï Lévesque

Maria Cholakova,
Local Journalism Initiative

Dozens of students and advocates call out McGill and its allies for the demolition

On July 10, after more than 70 days since its establishment, McGill University’s pro-Palestine encampment was dismantled by a private security firm hired by the university.

The private security firm entered the encampment early in the morning and began its demolition. Bulldozers and trucks entered McGill’s campus. Additionally, a large number of police officers—some wearing riot gear—were seen by campers on site on horseback and bicycles as early as 4:45 a.m.

Between 4:46 a.m. and 7:42 a.m., individuals in the encampment were “advised three times that they would be escorted off campus if they did not leave of their own accord,” according to McGill’s Emergency Operations Centre. The majority of the 35 campers present were escorted out. 

The university’s campus was shut down for the day and blocked off by police.

At 1:15 p.m., McGill’s Emergency Operations Centre announced that the encampment’s dismantlement was largely completed. 

According to Montreal police media relations officer Jean-Pierre Brabant, the police were present only for support and made one arrest of a man for assaulting a police officer. 

Concordia professor Ted Rutland said the police’s presence should not be overlooked. 

“McGill has managed to negotiate […] a side agreement with the police because the police role here is essential. I don’t think the security firm would be doing [the dismantlement] without police protection,” said Rutland. “The idea that the police aren’t involved in this is misleading. They are here, they are enabling this.”

In a press statement, McGill’s President and Vice-Chancellor Deep Saini stated that the “camp was not a peaceful protest. It was a heavily fortified focal point for intimidation and violence, organized largely by individuals who are not part of our university community.”

Saini alleged that a firm the university hired to investigate the encampment discovered two overdoses, syringes, illegal narcotics being sold, rat infestations and fire risks, including a propane canister and flammable materials next to the tents.

Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR) McGill has denied claims about the presence of illegal drugs at the encampment, claiming that the university is leading a defamation campaign against its own students.

“In their statement, McGill mischaracterizes the camp and has utilized photos of syringes that are present on the public street of Sherbrooke and pretended it was inside the camp,” SPHR McGill’s official spokesperson said.

The university’s decision to dismantle the camp via a private firm has come under fire from protesters and organizers.

SPHR McGill said the university has never had the well-being of students in mind. 

“Instead of moving money from companies that are actively facilitating war and occupation and genocide, the administration has taken every drastic measure to repress the movement for liberation,” SPHR McGill’s official spokesperson said. 

The group also accused the university of cutting off all electricity from the campus at night, along with dragging students into legal battles and accusing the encampment of violence.

Sam, a camper who preferred to use a pseudonym for safety reasons, alleged they were forcefully escorted from the encampment with no warning by the private security firm. 

“Our struggle to get McGill to divest from genocide, from the brutal massacre of Palestinians [shows] that [McGill] is scared and is resorting to violence,” Sam said.

Sam added that the university’s actions have given clarity to students on the university’s priorities, stating that violence is their “modus operandi.” 

Rutland said that McGill’s hiring of a private security company shows McGills intent. 

“The depravity of sending a bulldozer, the same bulldozers that are destroying Palestinian homes, the symbolism of that is going to last a while,” said Rutland. “What does this university stand for? It stands for genocide.”

According to Zeyad Abisaab, SPHR Concordia’s general coordinator, the removal of the encampment will not stop the organization’s work. 

“The students are determined and motivated that they will not stop fighting for a just cause,” said Abisaab “Demanding McGill, Concordia and all universities to divest from genocide, divest from the state of Israel, from the Zionist entity as a whole and specifically weapons companies.”

McGill contracts private security firm to dismantle pro-Palestine encampment Read More »

SPHR Concordia is going independent

SPHR is now independent, but their goals for divestment are still their priority. Photo Maria Cholakova

Maria Cholakova,
Local Journalism Initiative

The club will continue to fight for Palestine until divestment

Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR) Concordia has established itself since 1999 as one of the primary voices supporting Palestinians at Concordia.

Now, 25 years later, they are still fighting for the same cause.

From fundraisers to sit-ins, walkouts, protests and a contribution to the encampment at McGill University, the club has made its stance clear: There will be no rest until there is a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and Concordia University completely divests from Israel. However, divestment is currently not a priority for Concordia. 

On May 27, Concordia President Graham Carr testified at a House of Commons Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, stating that “the university’s position, since 2014, has been in opposition to BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions).”

However, Concordia’s current position isn’t stopping SPHR. According to an SPHR member, who was granted anonymity for safety reasons, the 2023-2024 academic year was a build-up towards BDS being a central topic of the discussion.

“[Now] you can’t go a few days or a few articles without Graham Carr or Deep Saini mentioning BDS,” they said. “That’s something that’s very important,” they said. 

Zeyad Abbisab, SPHR’s general coordinator, expressed that Concordia’s pushback on BDS and SPHR is more complex than just keeping the campus safe.

“[Institutions try] to suppress our voices because we are a threat to Zionism,” Abisaab said. “This is, yes, orientalism, but also economic incentives.”

Although Concordia’s investments are not shared publicly, the university has affiliations with companies that have been accused of being complicit in genocide. One of these companies is the Bank of Montreal, which in 2021 loaned an estimated US$90 million to a company that makes weapons and surveillance equipment used by the Israeli military.

Concordia also has academic connections to universities in Israel. The Azrieli Institute offered a field trip program in the summer of 2023 that allowed Concordia students to explore Israel in collaboration with Bar-Ilan University. Bar-Ilan is an institution that has allegedly been involved in “work with the Israeli military to develop unmanned combat vehicles and heavy machinery used to commit war crimes like home demolitions.”

SPHR is not alone in fighting against genocide and for BDS on campus. In the past year, the Arts and Science Federation of Associations and the Fine Arts Student Alliance passed a BDS motion. Additionally, the Quebec Public Interest Research Group, The People’s Potato, the Muslim Student Association, Solidarity Economy Incubation for Zero Emissions as well as hundreds of students across campus have all been demanding that Concordia divest from companies complicit in genocide. 

Although SPHR is continuing its activism work, it is also going through structural changes. Effective Sept. 3, SPHR will become an independent club, funding itself solely through community donations. SPHR has accused the university of not allowing them to sign up to become an official club this year. 

In June, the club received an email from the current acting dean of students, Katie Broad, as well as the director of the Office of Rights and Responsibilities (ORR), Aisha Topsakal. The university explained that SPHR will not be signed up as a student club anymore due to violations of the Code of Rights and Responsibilities. In the email, Concordia asked SPHR to remove three posts from its Instagram page as a condition for allowing the club to sign up once again. SPHR says that their independence won’t deter them from continuing their advocacy. 

Tension between the university administration and SPHR is nothing new. According to Abisaab, March and April were intense months for him and the club. 
 
On March 12, pro-Palestinian students picketed a talk by a professor from Tel Aviv University. The Israeli university was accused of offering special benefits and scholarships to student soldiers who participated in a 2014 military assault on Gaza. 

Although SPHR claims they did not organize the picket, the student group did participate in the strike. 

A month later, on April 10, Abisaab received two ORR complaints. One of the complaints was filed by the director of Campus Safety and Prevention Services because of SPHR’s involvement in the March 12 demonstration. The complaint alleged that Abisaab broke eight articles of the Code of Rights and Responsibilities. 

The second complaint was filed by a professor in the university, whose name The Link has not included for safety reasons. The complaint accused Abisaab of targeting the Azrieli Institute of Israel Studies. At the time of publication, the complaints are still ongoing. 

According to  Abisaab, the complaints were targeted towards him mainly due to his status as general coordinator of SPHR.

“It’s also an instance of profiling and discrimination,” Abisaab said. “Instead of actually looking at people who were there, or actually doing an investigation, or actually finding out what was said […], they just pin things to me.”

According to Concordia spokesperson Vannina Maestracci, over the past year, the administration has tried to keep the university safe by implementing changes across campus. Changes include increased personnel and monitoring of events and demonstrations; meeting with student groups to discuss de-escalation during events and taking disciplinary actions against students who have violated university rules; increased workshops on anti-discrimination and the establishment on April 3 of the Standing Together against Racism and Identity-based Violence Task Force. 

Although the university is making changes, the anonymous SPHR member still has concerns with the escalating number of Concordia Safety and Prevention Service officers during pro-Palestine events.

“We’ve definitely seen throughout the semester security watching us specifically when you walk [with] your keffiyeh on your shoulder,” the member said. 

Additionally, they believe that Palestine solidarity and the divestment movement are now much bigger than SPHR itself.

“Concordia should understand that all of these efforts [with security] do not help with reducing unrest on campus because it’s simply not just SPHR anymore,” the member said. “[Students] passed BDS motions.” 

 Abisaab is hopeful that the movement will stay strong and continue to fight for Palestine.

“We cannot be deterred by administrations, nor the courts, nor the SPVM, nor the city, nor the province, nor the country. No one can deter us, especially not the Zionists. Concordia and McGill and all administrations will be forced to adhere to our demands,” he said. “And the only thing between us and them are days.” 

This article originally appeared in Volume 45, Issue 1, published September 3, 2024.

SPHR Concordia is going independent Read More »

Concordia makes official statement on tuition hikes: The university is set to lose $62 million over four years

Lorraine Carpenter, Local Journalism Initiative reporter

Concordia University has formally made an announcement regarding the recent tuition hikes announced by the provincial government.

Tuition would double for out-of-province students and require universities to pay $20,000 to the government per international student enrolled from fall 2024.

The university expressed their dissatisfaction with the policy, stating that the change will have “devastating financial implications for Concordia and undermine our reputation as a global, next-gen university proud of its diversity, accessibility and openness to the world.”

According to Concordia, the university will lose $15.5 million in revenue for the 2024-2025 academic years and $62 million per year for the following four years. The university stated that their departments are expecting to lose 65 to 90 per cent of their out-of-province student population.

Concordia isn’t the only university speaking out. As a response to the Quebec government’s proposed tuition hikes, McGill shelved its plan to invest $50 million in promoting French to its staff, students and faculty members.

Students also took to the streets to voice their disapproval of the recent change. On Oct 30, students from Concordia, McGill and Bishop’s University organized a joint strike to protest the recent governmental implementations, voicing their anger and concerns over the news.

To combat the new provincial policy, Concordia says they are planning to “seek open channels of communication with the government, working with our colleagues at McGill and Bishop’s.”

Concordia makes official statement on tuition hikes: The university is set to lose $62 million over four years Read More »

Palestinian students claim Concordia dean of students waved middle finger at them: The university denies the altercation between Andrew Woodall and the students

Maria Cholakova & Iness Rifay

Local Journalism Initiative

On Oct. 12 around 6 p.m., Bara Abuhamed and his friend Yusuf, who wished to be given a pseudonym for his safety, were driving on Mackay Street while waving the Palestinian flag through the sunroof.

As the car passed by the Hall building on the Sir George Williams Campus, the students noticed a familiar figure at the nearby Bixi station. “We were parking the car when we saw an old man giving us the middle finger,” Yusuf said.

“Obviously, we were shaken,” Abuhamed said. “Why was he flipping us off?”

As the man loaned out a bicycle from the station, Abuhamed recognized the man to be Concordia Dean of Students Andrew Woodall.

“When I recognized him, I said ‘you’re the Dean of Students,’ and he said ‘yeah’ and drove off,” he said. “That’s when I stopped the car and told him that I’m a student. That’s when he stops, turns around and comes to apologize.”

In a video of the apology sent to The Link, Abuhamed confronted Woodall, calling him out for the disrespectful action. He also told the Dean he was being a hypocrite.

Abuhamed’s accusation of hypocrisy comes from his previous work with Woodall. In 2017, a letter threatening to set off a bomb in two of Concordia’s downtown buildings was sent to the Muslim Student Association (MSA). Abuhamed, who was the association’s VP at the time, worked with Woodall to ensure students were safe. Now, six years later, Woodall is allegedly giving the finger to the same person with whom he worked alongside.

Woodall apologized again and blamed the pressure on a “ton of pressure going on.”

Abuhamed responds “on us too,” telling the Dean that the Palestinian Concordia students community has gotten their private information leaked online–or doxxed–by Zionist extremists.

Woodall repeated his apology once more as Abuhamed told him that if a similar interaction transpired again, he would file a formal complaint.

“You do what you need to do,” Woodall said.

The Link contacted Concordia’s spokesperson Vannina Maestracci for comment on the situation, and she denied that Woodall made the gesture. According to Maestracci, “He [Dean Woodall] did give a look to the student,” given the statement that was sent on Wednesday about ‘high-charged moments such as the one we are in right now.’”

Upon hearing the spokesperson’s official response, Abuhamed wasn’t happy about how the university was dealing with the incident.

“If she’s going to accuse students of a lie, she’s either saying that my eyes don’t work or she wants to deny a situation that she knows Andrew is guilty of,” he said. “It’s clear as day what a middle finger looks like.”

Abuhamed also believes that if he and Yusuf had not disclosed that they were students to Woodall, he would not have come back to apologize.

Anti-Palestinian racism has been on the rise across North America in the past week. Two days prior to Abuhamed’s encounter with Woodall, a Tunisian woman got verbally harassed by a Montreal author, who wished upon the victim to get sexually harassed for carrying a Palestinian flag. On Oct. 14, CNN reported on a six-year-old Muslim child who was stabbed 26 times in Illinois by his family’s landlord and passed away the same day. His mother was also stabbed more than a dozen times.

In the wake of such hatred, demonstrators have started to gather not just in support of Gaza and Palestine, but the wider Arab community.

Palestinian students claim Concordia dean of students waved middle finger at them: The university denies the altercation between Andrew Woodall and the students Read More »

The fight for fair pay continues: Care and CREW-CSN are demanding better wages for TAs and RAs

Maria Cholakova

Local Journalism Initiative

Unions across campus have started negotiations with Concordia University to increase workers’ pay and sign new collective agreements.

The Concordia Association of Research Employees (CARE) has been at the negotiating table for over a year, demanding livable wages that match inflation and that are comparable to other universities in Montreal.

According to the union’s secretary-treasurer, Gabrielle McLaren, negotiations with Concordia have been “extremely difficult.” CARE’s collective agreement expired on May 31, 2022 and the union started negotiations three months later. However, McLaren noted that Concordia didn’t want to budge on salaries.

“They’ve been really unflinching, which is a problem,” she said. “It took us a really, really long time to even get Concordia to talk about money.”

She said she believes Concordia’s unwillingness to increase salaries is unfounded when comparing research employee salaries to those at McGill. “[McGill] just takes research more seriously and it shows financially,” she said.

Depending on the job employees unionized under CARE have, the hourly salary as a research assistant (RA) is a minimum of $23.43 per hour. In contrast, McGill pays RAs a minimum of $28 to $30 per hour.

By November 2022, negotiations were slower than CARE would have liked. “It became really clear that it was sort of [Concordia’s] way or the highway, which isn’t how bargaining works. That’s not how negotiations work,” McLaren said. Then, CARE decided to take matters into their own hands.

On Feb. 22, 2023, one hour before their meeting with Concordia’s negotiating team, CARE members gathered in front of the Faubourg Building, giving out flyers and informing passersby on the need for an increase in RA wages. The gathering was quickly shut down by Concordia security, who asked union members for their IDs.

“It became really clear from the start of that meeting that the university was unhappy that they had been greeted downstairs by our group, and it was a really difficult meeting that ended up with Concordia telling us that if we didn’t agree with them, we should just leave,” McLaren said.

For McLaren, the meetings weren’t productive anymore. “[Concordia] wasn’t respecting what we were bringing to the table, they weren’t showing up at meetings ready,” she said.

CARE then moved to conciliation, a step in bargaining where a neutral party would get involved to facilitate and fast-forward negotiation discussions.

“At first, we were sensing a change of attitude,” McLaren said. “Tensions in the room were releasing, the dialogue was more productive, but […] that did not last.”

In early August, Concordia presented an offer. Although some demands were met, the minimum salary was not increased for 2023. “It is ridiculous, given inflation. Plus, the minimums aren’t that high, they’re like $21,” she said.

Concordia refusing to increase wages was unacceptable for CARE. “You’re asking people to have research expertise, to have specialized skills with different software, different computing, different financial systems, different administrations; that’s not a competitive salary,” said McLaren.

CARE didn’t accept the offer and waited until September for Concordia’s new offer, which never came.

“Often our colleagues would ask, ‘How’d it go?’ And it was really tough,” she said. “How do I tell them that the employer just wasted two months of our time in the most diplomatic way possible.”

According to Vannina Maestracci, Concordia’s spokesperson, “The parties continue to negotiate and we are committed to reaching an agreement.”

The struggle for better pay has been felt by CARE and CREW-CSN alike.

Zachary Mitchell, a CREW-CSN militant and a teaching assistant (TA) and RA in the history department, said that considering inflation hit 5.2 per cent, the union will demand pay to at least match inflation.

“Fundamentally, a lot of us are being priced out of our own city. This is where we work, this is where we live. If we can’t afford rent, if we can’t afford food, what are we supposed to do?”

Mitchell said a better working environment culturally would benefit TAs and RAs as a whole. “We’re contracted for [a certain] number of hours, but often the expectation is to work above those hours, and there’s a real culture around it that’s developed over the years,” he said.

Mitchell added that Concordia’s negotiation strategies should change in order for unions to see change. “Concordia really has signalled sort of a policy of austerity in the past years, despite record inflation, but a very selective austerity,” he said.

He used Concordia President Graham Carr’s 10 per cent salary increase as an example in contrast to their strict no-pay increases for unions.

“Some of the unions here, even ones which are asking for very little—like four or five per cent—they’re kind of getting snubbed,” Mitchell said.

Mitchell added that all hope is not lost. “When things fail at the bargaining table, that’s when unions begin to take larger steps doing things like industrial action, possibly even escalating eventually to strikes,” he said.

The fight for fair pay continues: Care and CREW-CSN are demanding better wages for TAs and RAs Read More »

Scroll to Top