Incinerator

Clarendon revokes previous support for incinerator

Charles Dickson, LJI Reporter

In a unanimous vote last Tuesday evening, the council of the Municipality of Clarendon passed a resolution revoking its support for the proposed incinerator project for the Pontiac.
Last spring, the same council passed a resolution supporting the project.
“We revoked the previous one because, when the warden came and did her presentation last May, it was more for a solution to waste, and now it’s like the incinerator or bust, right?” Clarendon mayor Ed Walsh told THE EQUITY last Thursday.

“We weren’t comfortable with that, so in the fall we voted against the $120,000,” he said, referring to the resolution brought forward at last October’s meeting of the MRC Pontiac Council of Mayors to establish a single-source contract with consulting firm Deloitte to produce a business plan. In that vote, Clarendon was joined by Bristol, Chichester, Litchfield, Otter Lake and Waltham in opposition to the resolution.
“We’re definitely in support of the recycling and finding a solution for the 5,000 tons that we have,” said the mayor, referring to the 5,000 tons produced annually by the 18 municipalities in MRC Pontiac.
“But to bring in another 395,000 from somewhere else, I don’t think it’s an ideal project,” Walsh said.
“We discussed it, and in the resolution we stated that we were revoking our previous support, and it was unanimous for the whole council that we no longer support the incinerator proposal,” he said.
The Clarendon decision follows similar votes held recently by the municipalities of Waltham, Thorne and Otter Lake.

Clarendon revokes previous support for incinerator Read More »

Spence launches series of town hall presentations on incinerator project

Charles Dickson, LJI Reporter

It was close to a capacity crowd at St. Joseph’s Hall in Allumette Island on Monday evening with almost 100 people in attendance for an information meeting on the garbage incinerator project proposed for the Pontiac.

The gathering was the first of a series of town hall-styled public information sessions to be convened across the Pontiac over the coming weeks. Announced by Pontiac warden Jane Toller just five days prior at last Wednesday evening’s public meeting of mayors, the hastily-called series follows a tide of public concern over the proposed project that has been growing over recent weeks.

Allumette Island mayor Corey Spence made the presentation on behalf of MRC Pontiac. He began by showing a series of videos on the circular economy and the zero-waste concept whereby waste can be minimized through the reduction of consumption, repairing and reusing products instead of disposing of them, and recycling materials, arriving at the conclusion that, with the addition of composting, municipal waste can be reduced by up to 90 per cent.

Spence provided a favourable review of points made by Dr. Paul Connett, one of the presenters at the public information session convened by Citizens of the Pontiac in Campbell’s Bay on Mar. 2, whose video, which is highly critical of garbage incineration, has been circulating locally via social media over recent weeks. The mayor provided an overview of how landfill and energy-from-waste systems work, before turning to a presentation of what has been called the initial business case (IBC) developed by consulting firms Deloitte and Ramboll. At this point, the presentation took the form of a rapid succession of text-intensive slides, with words far too numerous and too small to read from the audience, with Spence reading passages from the screen so quickly and without benefit of a microphone that it was often impossible to discern what he was saying.

What came through was that the essential question addressed by the IBC is how the energy-from-waste (EFW) option compares to disposing of garbage in landfills, based on a volume of 400,000 tons of waste. Spence took the audience through several points of comparison between the two waste management systems, including long-run cost and carbon neutrality, among others, from which the IBC analysis concluded that the EFW option was superior to a landfill.

The IBC also considered three options regarding the design, construction, operation and maintenance of the envisioned EFW plant, with implications for the extent to which the resulting facility would be privately versus publicly owned. On this question, the report recommends that the facility should neither be completely privately owned nor completely publicly owned but rather the goldilocks option of 75 per cent public and 25 per cent private. Fundamental to this conclusion is the requirement for hundreds of millions of dollars to finance the project, making it clear that very significant public investment will be necessary for the project to be viable.

According to the IBC, total capital costs for the facility, which would include the use of technology to capture carbon dioxide it produces, would be $605 million, 25 per cent more than the $450 million price previously envisioned for the project. Spence said this would obviously be an impossible expense for Pontiac’s population of just 14,000 people without multi-million-dollar grants from the federal government and the provinces of Quebec and Ontario.

He said if we start now, the facility could be up and running by 2032.
In the question-and-answer session that followed, Spence asked whether anyone knew why so many incinerators were being shut down in Europe, and said it’s because countries have moved to zero waste and the incinerators are too big for the volume of garbage now available.

He said that the 400,000-ton target used in planning Pontiac’s incinerator project might have been wrong, in light of the significant reduction in the volume of garbage being generated in Ottawa due to the adoption of zero waste strategies. Warden Jane Toller, who attended the meeting, said she had learned that Ottawa’s waste has gone from a volume of 300,000 tons per year to probably 100,000 tons.
Asked by Judith Spence of Citizens of the Pontiac whether there was any documentation still available of an effort by Denzil Spence, a previous mayor of Allumette Island, to launch a garbage incinerator project, Warden Toller recalled that in 2012 Pontiac had expressed to Gatineau its interest in an incinerator project but that the project was stopped due to insufficient waste.

When asked why Deloitte and Ramboll, working under a contract in excess of $100,000, was not redirected by MRC Pontiac to shift its analysis to a lower tonnage figure, Spence said something to the effect that the project was too far along to change course.
Linda Davis of the group Stop the Pontiac Incinerator asked how the question of whether or not to proceed with the EFW project can be decided until an environmental assessment has been completed, which, in the case of the Durham York facility, she says cost $29 million. Spence agreed and said that such an assessment would be conducted.

A woman who identified herself as a long-time farmer described toxins coming out of incinerator smokestacks, landing on fields and being eaten by animals that we raise, and asked, “Why didn’t we start with an environmental assessment long before we began with the business case?”
Jordan Evans, farmer in Waltham, recalled Spence saying that remediation would be required as part of the project but that cleanup costs were not included in the IBC study, and asked, “How can you identify a winner without remediation costs?”

A woman from Thorne asked why the IBC basis of comparison is between incinerating 400,000 tons of garbage and landfilling the same volume, arguing that Pontiac produces only 5,000 tons of garbage each year and that it was never an option to landfill Ottawa’s 400,000 tons of garbage here.
Jennifer Quaile, a councillor in Otter Lake and member of Friends of the Pontiac, asked about the outcome of the warden’s recent meeting with the minister of environment, and whether he is receptive to bringing Ontario’s garbage into Quebec. The warden said “Waste from Ontario is not allowed if it is destined to a landfill, nor do they support incineration if it is just burned into the air, that it must be part of a circular economy.”

The turnout of some 100 people to Monday evening’s information session follows the attendance of approximately 40 people at last Wednesday’s meeting of MRC Pontiac’s Council of Mayors to voice their concerns regarding the environmental and health implications of the proposed incinerator, among other aspects of the project. In response, Warden Toller provided assurances that “MRC Pontiac will never move forward with a project that is unhealthy for our residents, animals, or environment.”
At last week’s Council of Mayors meeting, Linda Davis asked why the Deloitte/Ramboll business plan is not being released. “We’ve paid for it, why will you not allow us to have that?”
“It’s going to be available on a screen,” said Warden Toller, referring to the plan to project excerpts from the business plan on screens at the public information sessions.
“I don’t know that you’re going to be walking out with your own copy, but take good notes, you know, you can analyse it all you like,” the warden said.

In an interview aired by CHIP-FM last Thursday, reporter Caleb Nickerson asked the warden why the document was not being made publicly available.
“It’s very technical and some people are going to read it and not get much out of it,” Toller said.
“I think to have it presented and be able to have explanations and have questions answered is important,” she added.

Pressed by Nickerson on why the document could not be released, Toller asked him to turn off his recorder, which Nickerson declined to do. The warden later offered another response.
“This has been extremely challenging, with some information that has been given that has caused a lot of people to be fearful, and that is regrettable,” she said. “And we would like to reassure people with our information, and we would like the chance to have well-attended town hall meetings. If we just put it online and everybody reads it, nobody will be coming to the meetings.”
The other four town halls will be:

  • Mar. 27 – Fort Coulonge,
    Club de l’Age d’Or, 566 rue Baume
  • April 3 – Shawville,
    United Church Hall, 410 Main St.
  • April 9 – Campbell’s Bay,
    RA centre, 2 Second St.
  • April 10 – Otter Lake,
    RA centre, 394 Tessier St.

Spence launches series of town hall presentations on incinerator project Read More »

Three municipal councils call for halt to incinerator project

Charles Dickson, LJI Reporter

Mayor Spence to replace warden as spokesperson on EFW file

The councils of the municipalities of Otter Lake, Thorne and Waltham passed resolutions at their monthly meetings last week calling for a halt to any further development of the project to build a garbage incinerator in the Pontiac.

The plan to build an energy-from-waste (EFW) incinerator was unveiled by Pontiac County warden Jane Toller through a pair of community town hall-styled meetings she convened in June of last year. At that point, the warden reported that all 18 of the county’s mayors had already endorsed the proposal. Her efforts to convince municipalities to pass supportive resolutions, which had already been underway for months, resulted in eight having done so by the time she went public with her plan.
Thorne and Waltham were among those that passed resolutions declaring their support for the incinerator project last year. But, in unanimous votes by their councils last week, both municipalities rescinded their previous motions of support.

Otter Lake was not among the early supporters of the project. In its July meeting last year, the municipal council rejected the supportive resolution put forward by the warden. Last week, the council passed a resolution that reaffirms its earlier opposition to the incinerator and states it will not support the development of another business plan for the project.
The warden has described a document recently provided by consulting firms Deloitte and Ramboll under a single-source contract of more than $100,000 as an “initial business plan,” suggesting that a second version of the plan will be required.

Though the municipality of Litchfield passed a resolution declaring its opposition to the incinerator last August, proponents of the project continue to assert that an industrial site in Litchfield, next to the Ottawa River, just west of Portage du Fort, will be the future location of the proposed facility.

The energy-from-waste proposal being advanced by the warden and most of the mayors would see 395,000 tons of garbage from urban areas throughout the Ottawa Valley transported by some 40 trucks per day to feed the incinerator. According to the warden, the project would save $1.7 million currently spent on transporting Pontiac’s 5,000 tons of garbage to a landfill in Lachute, as well as create 50 permanent jobs and produce electricity that could be sold, among other benefits.

In response to the EFW project, local citizens’ groups formed over recent months have begun to raise public awareness of what they see as significant environmental and health hazards presented by the envisioned incinerator. Their concerns range from toxic substances in air-borne emissions and the 100,000 tons of ash they say the facility will produce, to the production of carbon dioxide from the trucking and burning of the garbage, among others.

Meanwhile, at a meeting of Pontiac County mayors last week, it was proposed that Corey Spence, mayor of Allumette Island, replace the warden as the spokesperson for the incinerator project. This follows criticism by mayors of the warden’s handling of the file. Among their concerns has been her presentation to Renfrew County mayors of what she called “key findings” of the recently-completed initial business plan, prior to Pontiac County mayors seeing the document, much less approving it for publication. An email the warden is reported to have sent to the mayors advising them not to share their views on the incinerator with the public has also rankled a number of mayors.

Three municipal councils call for halt to incinerator project Read More »

Citizens’ groups launch campaigns to oppose incinerator

Charles Dickson, LJI Reporter

Friends of the Pontiac issues fact sheet, Citizens of the Pontiac urges face-to-face engagement

Efforts to convince Pontiac County mayors to oppose any further development of the energy-from-waste project have been launched by two local citizens’ groups over the past few days.
On Friday, Friends of the Pontiac sent a fact sheet to MRC Pontiac’s 18 mayors outlining what it sees as the four most important reasons to stop work on the incinerator proposal, accompanied by a draft resolution that the group hopes municipalities will pass to express their opposition to the project.
“We wanted to provide a solid fact sheet based on scientific information the mayors may not have heard,” Jennifer Quaile, spokesperson for Friends of the Pontiac, said in an email to THE EQUITY.

Quaile, who is a municipal councillor in Otter Lake and member of the MRC Pontiac waste management committee, says the document cites its sources so mayors can check the credibility of the information for themselves.
“We hope there will be some mayors who will give it serious attention and start asking some hard questions,” she said.
The fact sheet presents four reasons why the group believes mayors should vote against a garbage incinerator:

  • the high cost of construction ($450 million) and the likelihood the price will only go up as it did with the Durham York incinerator,
  • that energy produced by waste incinerators emits a tonne of C02 for every tonne of garbage burned and so cannot be considered “clean energy”,
  • that even with “state of the art” pollution controls, garbage incinerators emit mercury, lead, arsenic, dioxins and furans and nanoparticles that contaminate air, water and soil and are a huge concern for farmers, and
  • that only 50 permanent jobs will be created, far fewer than the number of jobs generated by alternate waste management strategies involving reusing, recycling and composting options.
    Friends of the Pontiac, which formed last fall to oppose the incinerator project, held its first public information meeting in Ladysmith in November (see Concerns voiced over incinerator project at Friends of the Pontiac meeting, THE EQUITY, Nov. 22, 2023).

Along with its fact sheet, the group also distributed a draft resolution to the mayors for discussion and approval by their municipal councils. Building on the key points outlined in the fact sheet, the resolution culminates in the decision not to support any further work in the development of the incinerator proposal:
“THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Municipality of _ will not support going forward with a garbage incinerator nor will it support the development of another business plan for this proposal.”
“The primary reason we did this is because we believe local councillors should have a voice, that mayors should not independently continue to support this project even when there is scientific evidence being brought before them that should cause them to reconsider going forward,” Quaile said.

Citizens of the Pontiac launches
‘Face to Face’ Campaign

Meanwhile, another group, the recently-formed Citizens of the Pontiac (CoP), has launched a campaign it is calling Face to Face.
In a press release issued Monday, CoP urges Pontiac citizens to speak their mind on the incinerator at the Council of Mayors meeting held at the MRC Pontiac building in Campbell’s Bay each month.
“In this campaign, we are urging Pontiac citizens to come out to the MRC office on March 20 at 6:30 pm, and every month thereafter, until the mayors vote down the incinerator project completely,” says CoP spokesperson Judith Spence.

“Come out, bring your friends, bring your family, get your five minutes to speak to the mayors face to face. The Citizens of the Pontiac (CoP) will be there to stand by you and to support you. This may be the most critical five minutes of your life,” Spence says.
More than 100 people attended a public information session convened by Citizens of the Pontiac in Campbell’s Bay on Mar. 2 that featured speakers who shared their concerns about garbage incinerators via Zoom from Ontario and England (see Concern over incinerator fills Campbell’s Bay Rec Centre, THE EQUITY, Mar. 6, 2024).

Citizens’ groups launch campaigns to oppose incinerator Read More »

Concern over incinerator fills Campbell’s Bay Rec Centre

Pierre Cyr, LJI Reporter

One hundred and twenty-four people attended a public information meeting at the Campbell’s Bay Recreation Centre on Saturday afternoon to hear concerns about MRC Pontiac’s proposal to build a garbage incinerator in the Municipality of Litchfield.
The meeting, convened by Judy Spence and her group Citizens of the Pontiac presented four speakers with extensive experience on the matter of energy-from-waste incinerators, all of whom joined the meeting via Zoom to share their views.

The keynote speaker, Dr. Paul Connett, is a graduate of Cambridge University and holds a PhD in chemistry from Dartmouth University. He is the author of the 2013 book The Zero Waste Solution and is an international expert in waste management and environmental toxicology. Connett, who doesn’t charge anything to share his expertise and channels all the profits from his sales of his books to support non-profit organizations, participated in Saturday’s meeting via Zoom from England.

“This is really an absurd solution for Pontiac,” said Connett who has shared his expertise on over 300 incinerator projects. “You will be producing 20 times more toxic ash than the trash you currently have,” he said, explaining that an incinerator that burns 400,000 tons of garbage produces about 100,000 tons of ash, which is 20 times the 5,000 tons of garbage currently produced across Pontiac County.
Connett said that the fly ash coming from the incinerator is particularly toxic with some extreme levels of lead and cadmium, and showed studies revealing that these chemicals, dioxins, and nanoparticles accumulate in the environment and contaminate surface waters and the food chain.
‘’Why would you play Russian roulette with your children’s brains?” Connett asked.
“Making dirty energy is stupid,’’ he said, adding that a big incinerator will ruin the image of Pontiac, reduce property values, threaten farming, and undermine hope for genuine economic development.
‘’You can’t be polite about it. You can’t keep quiet about it. You have got to shout and make some noise if you don’t want this to happen in Pontiac,’’ he said.
Connett believes the alternative for Pontiac is a good zero-waste program that will reduce residual waste to 1,000 tons per year.

He also said that, in contrast with the 50 jobs promised for the envisioned $450,000 facility, far more jobs would be created by having a good zero-waste strategy here in the Pontiac
“Our job today is not to find better ways to destroy material, but to stop making products and packaging using materials that must be destroyed,” he said.
The second speaker was Linda Gasser, who fought against the Durham York Energy Center (DYEC) incinerator project in Ontario and is with the group Zero Waste 4 Zero Burning. She shared that the cost of the project went up from the original estimate of $197 million to $295 million for the 140,000-ton capacity incinerator. She said the Durham York incinerator suffered two fires in its early days, as well as breakdowns requiring shutdowns of the facility for up to three months.
‘’No one should point to DYEC as an example to follow. It’s a failure in every respect,” said Gasser.

The next speaker was Wendy Bracken with the group Durham Environment Watch who was also involved in the environmental watch of the DYEC. She offered data that shows emissions of dioxin/furan more than 12 times above the legal limits. Bracken also brought forward weaknesses in the testing of the emissions coming from the incinerator, saying they were conducted too infrequently and for too short a period to provide an accurate indication of the level of toxins actually being emitted. According to Bracken, Canadian regulations and standards regarding incinerators are outdated when compared to those in Europe or the United States.

Next was Liz Benneian, a former newspaper editor with a degree in science, now working with the Ontario Zero Waste Coalition, who helped to run a successful campaign to stop an $800 million incinerator project in Ontario in 2005.
“We were able to prove that these plants never work as promised. We could prove their emissions were toxic,” said Benneian.
Benneian said that one of the characteristics of the incinerator experience is untransparent local government.

“In the Pontiac, why is public money being spent on business cases, and why is pre-agreement being sought to bring waste from Ontario while the public is kept in the dark?” asked Benneian. “What else is going on behind the scenes?”
According to Benneian, it should be obvious that the problem of waste generation cannot be solved by an incinerator that requires an ongoing production of waste.
“With only 5,000 tons of waste to manage, the incinerator is a solution we don’t need for a problem we don’t have,” concluded Benneian.
Benneian, Bracken and Gasser have helped more than 10 Ontario community groups in their battle to prove that an incinerator project was not a good solution for waste management. They succeeded in 100 per cent of the cases to have local and regional politicians change their mind and vote against an incinerator project.

After listening to the speakers at the meeting, Josey Bouchard, a Campbell’s Bay municipal councillor and spokesperson for the health advocacy group Pontiac Voice, declared that she will now support efforts to stop the construction of the incinerator.
“It is a dump, a glorified dump, and I don’t think our region should be anybody’s dump,” said Bouchard.
Video of the presentations will be available at www.citizensofthePontiac.ca over the coming days.

Concern over incinerator fills Campbell’s Bay Rec Centre Read More »

Scroll to Top