Lionel Carmant

Where is the help you offered? Resilience Montreal asks government

By Dan Laxer
The Suburban

Resilience Montreal put together a detailed budget into its services and its financial needs specifically because provincial Social Services Minister Lionel Carmant asked them to. Why, then, Executive Director David Chapman wants to know, are they now being ignored?

Resilience Montreal is planning a move to a larger, better facility – from its current location at the corner of Ste. Catherine and Atwater to 780 Atwater a few blocks further south. The move will come with extended hours, and will require new hires to respond to increased need in the community. And that requires funding.

Last November Carmant’s office reached out to the shelter, offering to help. Carmant, the CAQ MNA for Taillon, met with Chapman, and brought along Guillaume Cliche-Rivard, the opposition MNA for Saint-Henri-Sainte-Anne. They toured the site of the new facility, discussed the shelter’s mission and needs, and talked about funding.

Carmant acknowledged, at the time, that the money Resilience does get is nowhere near enough. Cliche-Rivard had also asked about the shelter’s budgetary shortfall. But since then there’s been no contact from Carmant’s office. So Chapman sent a letter to Carmant, co-signed by Nakuset, director of the Native Women’s Shelter of Montreal (and co-founder of Resilience).

In the letter, a copy of which was sent to The Suburban, Chapman writes, “we were surprised in January to learn that no funding would be allocated to address this shortfall and that our expansion proposal, designed with the neighbourhood’s well-being in mind, was not being supported.”

Carmant’s office says that Resilience Montreal already receives funding through the provincial government’s plan to alleviate homelessness and its Indigenous support. His office then suggested they ask the federal government for more funding.

Chapman explains that Carmant is referring to money that comes from the Secrétariat aux relations avec les Premières Nations et les Inuit (SRPNI). It’s something Chapman says Resilience gets every year to the tune of $100,000. Their budget, however, is $2.2 million. “$100,000 is two months’ of groceries.”

Resilience Montreal operates with an all-Indigenous board, a team of 50% Indigenous operating staff, and an 80% Indigenous intervention team. “And a lot of the clients we service,” Chapman tells The Suburban, “are second-generation residential school survivors.”

Chapman acknowledges that Resilience does get $500,000 a year from the CIUSSS. But combined with the funding that Carmant is referring to, they start off each year with less than half of their budget, having to scrounge to make up the balance via private donors.

So Chapman is wondering why, if the provincial government either can’t – or won’t – help, why did they approach Resilience Montreal in the first place?

“Our situation is dire,” Chapman’s letter warns, “and the future of Resilience Montreal is uncertain.”

He says they have enough money left in the bank to get them through the next three weeks. “After that we go below zero.” If no money is forthcoming after that, Chapman says, they may have to close “for a while.”

He says that Resilience Montreal remains committed to the partnership that Carmant proposed. “We believe that with your support,” he wrote to Carmant, “we can make a significant difference in the lives of the homeless population and the community at large.” n

Where is the help you offered? Resilience Montreal asks government Read More »

Robert-Baldwin MNA says “youth protection system protects itself, not children’s rights”

By Chelsey St-Pierre
The Suburban

Brigitte Garceau, Liberal MNA for Robert-Baldwin and official opposition critic for youth protection, says the sense of urgency to repair the broad array of youth protection system failures by Minister Lionel Carmant and Deputy Minister and National Director of Youth Protection Catherine Lemay is virtually non-existent.

Garceau’s view is shared by journalist and author of two books on youth protection, Nancy Audet, who recently additionally denounced the fact that 20% of the establishments that house children under youth protection in the province are dilapidated. “Nobody should be living in establishments like Mont St-Antoine which are totally uninhabitable, and it is also reprehensible that any establishment have isolation cells as was recently discovered at the Cartier facility in Laval,”Garceau said.

Garceau has hammered home the fundamental issue of mothers losing custody of their children to violent fathers due to inadequate training of social workers in conjugal violence cases where social workers mistakenly and unilaterally accuse mothers of parental alienation. She has asked Minister Lionel Carmant to launch an investigation. “There was a motion that the government did not support. It is obvious that this issue is not a priority to the Minister nor to the government.”

In 2016, nearly 52% of reports to the Department of Youth Protection concerned children exposed to conjugal violence. Following the Laurent Commission report, Regine Laurent stated to media that parental alienation findings by unqualified social workers and other matters related to conjugal violence was the subject, by far, that generated the greatest number of calls and emails to the Commission.

Garceau told The Suburban that,”I don’t understand the logic of maintaining a dysfunctional ‘status quo’. The efforts are placed on protecting the system instead of protecting the rights of the children. One of the main recommendation’s of The Laurent Commission was the creation of an independent Commissioner for the Welfare and Rights of Children. The government in its proposed Bill 37 has failed to integrate all of those powers and responsibilities recommended into the position of the Commissioner. This call for change is fundamental and necessary if we are to reform the system so that it is fully accountable. It is imperative that a commissioner has the ability to investigate and to intervene with watchdog powers. The DPJ must be under supervision and held accountable and exercise its duties with full transparency.”

Almost three years after she was appointed, Lemay was quoted defending youth protection and her mandate saying, “The attacks on youth protection certainly affect me. It is an essential sector for our society. When things are bad, I tell myself that I am in the right place to make changes.”

Garceau insists that it is high time to see some concrete action, investigation and reform. n

Robert-Baldwin MNA says “youth protection system protects itself, not children’s rights” Read More »

Robert-Baldwin MNA demands an investigation of DPJ cases

By Chelsey St-Pierre

Concerned by recent disturbing revelations about mothers who are victims of conjugal violence and who have lost custody of their children amid accusations of parental alienation, Brigitte Garceau, Liberal MNA for Robert-Baldwin and official opposition spokesperson for youth protection, presented a motion to the National Assembly, calling for an investigation into these cases. The motion was supported by the entire opposition including the Liberals, QS, the PQ and the independent MNA for Vaudreuil.

Garceau demanded that Lionel Carmant, the Minister responsible for Social Services, launch an investigation into reported cases where children were entrusted to violent fathers under the pretext that the mothers were initiating parental alienation, a concept poorly understood by stakeholders of the Director of Youth Protection (DPJ), due to lack of adequate training.

Studies have shown that a child’s risk of abuse increases after a perpetrator of intimate partner violence separates from a domestic partner, even when the perpetrator has not previously directly abused the child.

Garceau says that Minister Carmant’s inaction on ensuring adequate training on conjugal violence for those employed by the DPJ system, is causing disastrous situations for too many mothers who are victims of conjugal violence.

“Mothers are completely broken and torn by the current situation. The lack of training of DPJ workers on conjugal violence, which includes parental alienation and coercive control, is one of the significant problems at the heart of the issues. Despite this, Minister Carmant still refuses to impose a mandatory four-day training, which would allow them to better understand the issue and to make proper evaluations where conjugal violence is at play,” Garceau stated. n

Robert-Baldwin MNA demands an investigation of DPJ cases Read More »

Scroll to Top