Court

No financial strategy for Percé tourism sector

Nelson Sergerie, LJI Journalist

PERCÉ – Discussions between the Town of Percé and business owners who wanted to meet with the town council last winter to find a solution for financing tourism infrastructure have still not begun.
A tourist tax was introduced on May 1, 2022, and the court ruled it illegal in June 2023 because it did not comply with the enabling powers prescribed by the Cities and Towns Act relating to municipal taxes.

The court concluded that the framework allowed a municipality to enter into an agreement to make a third party the collector of the tax, but that this role of collector could not be imposed, which exceeded the powers granted.

The Town of Percé had initiated proceedings in the Court of Appeals, but the council backed down in June 2024.

“We did not receive any feedback from groups of merchants, hoteliers, and restaurateurs who wanted to propose alternatives to the fee as it was proposed,” says Mayor Daniel Leboeuf.
“It’s unfortunate because we could have made progress before the tourist season. We’ll wait for them. It’s their industry, so they need to find a way to promote it and come up with the means to do so,” adds the mayor.

Mr. Leboeuf believes that this issue could become part of the public debate during the upcoming municipal election campaign this fall.

“It’s not in my program. I’d rather wait for their suggestions,” says the mayor, who will be seeking re-election in November.

“Percé devotes a significant portion of its budget to hospitality and infrastructure that must be maintained by a small population. It’s considerable. The industry has to do its part,” the mayor continues.
The tourist tax originally proposed by former mayor Cathy Poirier added $1 to purchases of goods and services over $20, with some exceptions, and $1 per night to help maintain tourist infrastructure. The town estimates that infrastructure costs $800,000 per year to maintain.

In 2022, $155,000 was collected during the tax’s only year of application.

Financial statements presented in August.

On June 30, the town filed its 2024 financial statements, meeting the legal deadline, during a special council session.

The accounting firm’s documents were submitted to the town over the last week of June.
“We received them at the last minute. That didn’t give us time to review the results. A surplus has been identified, and we want to understand where it came from before presenting it to the citizens,” explains Mr. Leboeuf.

When asked to comment on the size of the surplus, the mayor remained vague.

“It is higher than last year’s. It’s not necessarily because we charged too much in taxes. There are many factors involved. We will demonstrate this on August 5,” is all the mayor would say.
The town of Percé recorded a surplus of $551,669 for the 2023 fiscal year, out of a total budget of $8,042,843

No financial strategy for Percé tourism sector Read More »

Chandler-Louisette Langlois Dispute: Hearing not set until spring of 2026

Nelson Sergerie, LJI Journalist

CHANDLER – The Town of Chandler’s motion seeking more than $300,000 from former Mayor Louisette Langlois, who challenged the sanction imposed against her by the Municipal Commission in 2020, will not be heard in court until the spring 2026. The delay is due to difficulties in finding a judge ready to hear the case.

Beforehand, a pre-trial conference will have to be held to determine how many days need to be scheduled for the hearing. The application filed in 2022 was amended from its original amount of $230,411.

Since January, $5,248 in legal fees have been added, for a total of $410,034 to date.

The Percé Courthouse clerk issued the certificate of completeness on January 7.

In January 2021, the municipal council adopted a resolution leading to the filing of the claim by the town, emphasizing in particular that the allegations against Louisette Langlois resulted from gross or intentional misconduct, by giving precedence to her personal interest, by having committed actions intentionally and premeditatedly, all to achieve her ends.

This argument was repeated in the motion for an originating application for reimbursement of defence costs filed in January 2022.

The invoice claimed at that time was $230,411. Chandler’s attorneys noted in particular that “The decision rendered (…) on December 21, 2020 is damning of the defendant and establishes that the defendant’s acts or omissions constitute serious misconduct and/or intentional misconduct and/or separable from the performance of her duties.”

They added that the former elected official “has multiplied proceedings, some of which are unnecessary, unfounded, and truncated in light of the evidence presented before the CMQ (Commission municipale du Québec).”

In December 2019, Louisette Langlois was cited for 21 violations of the Chandler Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct for Elected Officials. Following hearings in July 2020, the commission concluded in December 2020 that the former elected official was guilty of 20 violations, including conflicts of interest. Before the sanction hearing, Ms. Langlois had attempted to obtain a stay of proceedings, contested the notice of sanction issued against her, and even requested that the investigation be reopened. These requests were rejected by administrative judge Sandra Bilodeau.

The former mayor made an appeal to the Superior Court, but it was dismissed in July 2021, and she suffered the same fate in October 2021 before the Court of Appeal.

Furthermore, the motion accused her of subsequently escalating the number of proceedings

Chandler-Louisette Langlois Dispute: Hearing not set until spring of 2026 Read More »

Scroll to Top